Olympics Thread
-
What penance would you take for Olympic gold? Losing the Bledisloe? Losing the Rugby Championship? Being defending champions like England in 2004?
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="604559" data-time="1470786198"><p>
all of the 2nd paragraph supports my other contention that they're leftovers and shouldn't be called ABs. <br><br>
we are losing because we are not selecting our best players, and the game has progressed to the extent that to dominate we need to - whereas previously we could get away with it - the only way for us to do that is to either neglect the 15s (never going to happen) or allow players to come in late.<br><br>
no idea of how difficult the scheduling would be, but it would be great for the olympic 7s if a window could be created to get as many international superstars as possible on the park.</p></blockquote>Are the other top teams stacked with 15s ring ins too? I'd have thought 7s should be treated as a separate game and supported accordingly by the NZRFU -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="604564" data-time="1470786317">
<div>
<p>What penance would you take for Olympic gold? Losing the Bledisloe? Losing the Rugby Championship? Being defending champions like England in 2004?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>All Blacks > Olympics all day long.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="604561" data-time="1470786238">
<div>
<p>The Football Ferns are not going well either. Not that that is really a surprise against France, but still ... France leading 2-0 with 5 minutes to play.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Same old story, can't score against the better teams. I doubt a -4 GD will be good enough to advance as one of the best 3rd placed teams.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="KiwiMurph" data-cid="604555" data-time="1470785843">
<div>
<p>It's actually not quite knockout - a close loss SHOULD see the NZ 7s through the quarters thanks to their good for/against - the Aussies look in the most danger of missing out at this stage. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>True - but, we don't want to be grovelling through as lucky losers - though it would be quite amusing to play the Jaapies in the quarterfinals. :)</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Chris B." data-cid="604576" data-time="1470788057">
<div>
<p>True - but, we don't want to be grovelling through as lucky losers - <strong>though it would be quite amusing to play the Jaapies in the quarterfinals</strong>. :)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It'll only be amusing if we win</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="604580" data-time="1470788379">
<div>
<p>I completely lost track of hockey at the Olympics. Does anyone know how the men and women Black Sticks are going?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Not well I don't think</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="604580" data-time="1470788379">
<div>
<p>I completely lost track of hockey at the Olympics. Does anyone know how the men and women Black Sticks are going?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I think the women thumped South Korea, but lost to Germany (4-1 and 1-2 if my memory serves me correctly). The loss to the Germans was worse than the score suggested - Germans could easily have put another couple past us.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I think the Men have two losses and a draw, but I haven't followed them.</p> -
<p>Further to this - I think the top four from each group make the Quarterfinals, so the women really need to beat Spain in their next game and that should at least qualify them. After that we have the Netherlands who are usually bloody good and China, who are doing quite well, but I think we beat recently.</p>
-
<p>Still a long way to go in the 7s, I wouldn't be writing off NZ yet.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As for the debate on 15s players, I think the evidence of 2016 so far has been that 7s is very hard to adapt to, and you can't just bung blokes in with a few months training and expect them to thrive. It's highly specialised, and almost every attempted convert has been shown up - Habana, Cooper, Speight, de Jongh, Cummins, Hougaard, Messam etc. SBW is the only one who has committed a full year to the program, and he is far from NZ's best player.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sevens is quite a fickle game, which is why IMO it's a fraught exercise to make the Olympics a referrendum on the success or failure of a whole program. NZ have won multiple World Series titles this year, and are clearly one of the best sides in the world. An Olympics failure would obviously be disappointing, but doesn't totally invalidate everything Titch has done.</p> -
<p>And make that 20 golds for Phelps. Maybe 21 later today. </p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Chris B." data-cid="604632" data-time="1470796864"><p>
If our Sevens team happens to win a medal (not the brightest prospect right now) does SBW get one?</p></blockquote>
<br>
Is there any point? He'll just give it to some undersized, over-pampered kid who charges onto the field. -
<p>is there anyone that polarizes people more than SBW in NZ?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The guys on RS this morning were saying they were getting some nasty scathing texts about SBW following his injury this morning.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Gotta feel for him, was looking like getting a real shot at owning the 12 jersey (and lets be honest, we needed him to do just that too) and goes and gets injured, gone for rest of the year at least.</p> -
I love the idea here by some that 7s takes a lifetime to master, yet SBW who has played about 200 minutes of test rugby in the past 3.5 years was magically going to solve our midfield after reconverting to the XV man game after this. Test rugby must be pretty easy relative to 7s.
-
<p>not sure anyone was saying he would magically solve anything, but based on what we have seen this year in our mid-field, it was highly likely he was gong to be better than that!</p>
