• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcspringboksscotland
153 Posts 37 Posters 7.9k Views
RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SidBarret
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    That was a very dumb performance by the the boks.

    We have issues with goal kicking, but a monster maul, so what do we do? Take two very ambitious shots when we could go to the corner to turn the screw.

    The frontrow took until half time to set up properly. In the first they were caught with their feet too far back, but didn't fix it themselves.

    Twice holding balls in messy mauls leading to turnovers.

    Kicking three grubbers while in the Scottish 22.

    Cheslin twice getting caught out of position for 50 22s (recovered the first one).

    Not good enough.

    Billy WebbB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by MN5
    #125

    @Bovidae said in RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland:

    Sometimes having a short front row can be an advantage in the scrums as you get underneath taller opponents.

    While Scotland did make handling errors, the scrum and lineout woes in the 2nd half were their biggest problem. van der Merwe wasn't in the game until the last 20 mins.

    I've always thought that Scotland is a better chance to beat Ireland than SA.

    Yeah, although recent history favours the Irish. Scotland haven’t had a win since 2017.

    I think the world ranking of fifth is pretty generous because ( maybe this is history speaking ) even if they did knock over Ireland I still reckon there’s a snowballs chance in hell of them beating the ABs in a quarter final.

    But then…..

    Foster.

    So exciting times coming up !!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #126

    I hope Ireland will knock over SA and top their group. I give us no chance at all against SA and while I think Ireland will beat us, it will be a lot closer. With a bit of luck who knows we may even just scrape through.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to akan004 on last edited by taniwharugby
    #127

    @akan004 SA have never beaten us in a quarter/semi have they?

    That can be another '1st' if it happens for that list someone is making....but I think we are more than capable of beating them, we just need to play more than 30 odd minutes.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to SidBarret on last edited by
    #128

    @SidBarret said in RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland:

    That was a very dumb performance by the the boks.

    We have issues with goal kicking, but a monster maul, so what do we do? Take two very ambitious shots when we could go to the corner to turn the screw.

    The frontrow took until half time to set up properly. In the first they were caught with their feet too far back, but didn't fix it themselves.

    Twice holding balls in messy mauls leading to turnovers.

    Kicking three grubbers while in the Scottish 22.

    Cheslin twice getting caught out of position for 50 22s (recovered the first one).

    Not good enough.

    Agree with everything here.
    I felt the Boks struggled to get out of second gear. Driving mauls - the few they tried - were sloppy. In fairness, credit must go to Scotland for blunting this weapon, although I felt that if we persisted, we would have come right.
    And some of the decisions to go for posts from penalties were just dumb. The one from +50m rates as idiotic. We were winning our lineouts pretty well, and eventually the rolling maul would have clicked...

    But I will take the win and we can move on. I thought Scotland could be a real banana peel for us, glad we negotiated our way through this.

    And as a footnote: Jesse Kriel was jolly lucky to avoid any sanction for the headclash tackle. Certainly if the same ruling that affected Tom Curry was made. Which, in my opinion is a yellow only for what it's worth. Thought the upgrade to red for Curry was stupid.

    OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #129

    @taniwharugby Don't think we have the pack to match them. We may hold our own with our starting pack, but as they start to tire and when their bomb squad comes on we will struggle imo. Our forward reserves aren't in the same league as theirs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SidBarret
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    Re the head clash - yeah both the big calls were wrong this weekend - both should have been yellow cards.

    The whole point of the "over punishment" of high tackles is aimed at getting players to change behaviour, but if smashing your own head and getting a yellow isn't going change behaviour then nothing will.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    replied to SidBarret on last edited by
    #131

    @SidBarret nah mate. Once you’ve given Gussy T a 3 week ban for the hit on Ringrose last year, you’ve set the standard. Curry and Kriel need to do some porridge.

    taniwharugbyT S 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to game_film on last edited by
    #132

    @game_film said in RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland:

    set the standard

    problem is, the standard seems to change week to week

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SidBarret
    replied to game_film on last edited by SidBarret
    #133

    @game_film and Telea and Frizell got nothing for their high shots at Mt Smart.

    The issue is that the current framework puts way too much pressure on referees to make game deciding calls in every game, but it is premised on the idea that it will make the game safer which I don't think is the case.

    taniwharugbyT G 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to SidBarret on last edited by
    #134

    @SidBarret but they have removed that decision from the ref, but as we have already seen, TMO with the benefit of time and multiple angles can still get it wrong.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    replied to SidBarret on last edited by
    #135

    @SidBarret agree with that. You can excuse the ref, even the TMO sometimes when there’s loads going on. Might agree or disagree with what they’ve decided to do with regards to a solution.

    What you can’t excuse is a retrospective process failing to act once you’ve told us where you stand on an issue. Hence, Tom and Jesse got some laundry to iron.

    S MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #136

    Traffic light signals from box are to signal support staff?

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #137

    @pakman Red: Loose head fake injury. Amber: Hooker fake injury. Green: Tighthead fake injury.

    1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SidBarret
    replied to game_film on last edited by
    #138

    @game_film

    I agree with your last point about citings.

    We've seen way too many cases where something is missed during the game which is plain for anyone to see on TV, but they fail to cite. I think a lot of that has to do with covering for referees. WR seem to take the view that if the referee misses something then it never happened.

    But that also goes to the pressure refereeing teams are under in the game. Something like the Curry and Kriel incidents are things that ruin games because it is such tight calls and with outsized influence on the game.

    I think we all agree we want the game to be as safe as reasonably possible.

    My view is the best way to achieve that is by ensuring consistent and appropriate punishment for all foul play. I just dont think red cards and multi week bans achieve the goal we want with these types of head on head collisions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to game_film on last edited by
    #139

    @game_film said in RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland:

    @SidBarret agree with that. You can excuse the ref, even the TMO sometimes when there’s loads going on. Might agree or disagree with what they’ve decided to do with regards to a solution.

    What you can’t excuse is a retrospective process failing to act once you’ve told us where you stand on an issue. Hence, Tom and Jesse got some laundry to iron.

    Haven’t actually seen the Kriel incident but from what I’ve heard it was pretty much identical to the Curry one ?

    So should be a card for the sake of consistency ? ( but Curry didn’t even deserve one so lets not go there )

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #140

    @Stargazer said in RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland:

    is this legal? Using portable sunbeds on the Bok players to deal with the lower EU UV levels? He should be tanned and hide.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • OomPBO Offline
    OomPBO Offline
    OomPB
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #141

    @Billy-Webb Thats the negatives I suppose. Beforehand I would take a 1 point win anyday. The Bok defense and player depth is unbelievable , the best in WR at the moment.

    Libbok changed our rugby from dull and bored into something else. We need AE and Moodie in midfield against Ireland. We need to knock them over.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #142

    @Stargazer said in RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland:

    This is really weird. We have every amazing form of modern tech yet he is using something the HMS Hood probably used to communicate with the fůcking Ark Royal when hunting the Bismark during WW2. Seriously wtf?

    OomPBO mariner4lifeM W 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • OomPBO Offline
    OomPBO Offline
    OomPB
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by OomPB
    #143

    @Rancid-Schnitzel They probably havent allowed it from the disco lights from the roof. Rassie did this at the start of his coaching career with the Cheetahs.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0

RWC Week 1: Springboks v Scotland
Rugby Matches
rwcspringboksscotland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.