NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship)
-
For the current round. Some teams aren't posted yet. Like NZ. But France is including a link to player stats
As is Australia. They have one Blackwell height lock at 1.90 but the other is 1.99
But maybe as Stargazer said the stats might not be reliable. But it's a good guide
There is also lots of great stats as I went down the page
Like pack weight France v NZ. NB. Backs are called Backwards (I guess a forward set this up)
France U20s VS New Zealand U20s
904 kg (113.00 kg) Pack weight
(average) 0 kg (nan kg)
19 ans Forwards average age nan ans
19 ans Backwards average age nan ans
200 cm Tallest player cm
France : 93% (14/15)
Samoa : 7% (1/15) Differents nationalities for starters
France : 96% (22/23)
Samoa : 4% (1/23) Differents nationalities for all the teamNZ pack Weight V Wales = 874kg
-
This is also very useful
All player stats from all countries including NZ. By country and competition (U20s is at the bottom)
Two examples
and also.
The equal heaviest NZ player
The youngest player. Born 24/9/2014. Second youngest is Tom Allen
-
@Winger said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
The youngest player. Born 24/9/2014. Second youngest is Tom Allen
There are four players in the U20 squad who are in their first year out of school. Vai and Bason are the others.
-
@Winger said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
This is also very useful
All player stats from all countries including NZ. By country and competition (U20s is at the bottom)
Two examples
and also.
The equal heaviest NZ player
The youngest player. Born 24/9/2014. Second youngest is Tom Allen
Not sure about some of the translations used for that website
-
@Stockcar86 Fords and Backwards
-
@Tordah Yeah. Unless Laidlaw is Harry Potter and can wave a magic wand, his tight five aren't going to be much better than those who got beaten by the Aussie kids a month ago. And the expectation seems to be France will be better.
Without having paid much too attention, I'd guess France by plenty.
-
@Chris-B said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@Tordah Yeah. Unless Laidlaw is Harry Potter and can wave a magic wand, his tight five aren't going to be much better than those who got beaten by the Aussie kids a month ago. And the expectation seems to be France will be better.
Without having paid much too attention, I'd guess France by plenty.
Some different players. Unsure how much diff this will make though
-
@Chris-B said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@Tordah Yeah. Unless Laidlaw is Harry Potter and can wave a magic wand, his tight five aren't going to be much better than those who got beaten by the Aussie kids a month ago. And the expectation seems to be France will be better.
Without having paid much too attention, I'd guess France by plenty.
What's our problem? Are our players relatively younger and those of the opposition relatively older? Obviously the future is uncharted, but some of these guys will be tomorrow's test players and I'd prefer not to see us getting pumped as a arbinger of our AB future
-
@canefan said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
What's our problem? Are our players relatively younger and those of the opposition relatively older?
Not according to this. NZ is older
France U20s VS New Zealand U20s
904 kg (113.00 kg) Pack weight
(average) 885 kg (110.63 kg)
19 ans Forwards average age 20 ans
19 ans Backwards average age 20 ans
200 cm Tallest player 198 cm
France : 93% (14/15)
Samoa : 7% (1/15) Differents nationalities for starters New Zealand : 100% (15/15)
France : 96% (22/23)
Samoa : 4% (1/23) Differents nationalities for all the team New Zealand : 100% (23/2 -
@canefan said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@Chris-B said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@Tordah Yeah. Unless Laidlaw is Harry Potter and can wave a magic wand, his tight five aren't going to be much better than those who got beaten by the Aussie kids a month ago. And the expectation seems to be France will be better.
Without having paid much too attention, I'd guess France by plenty.
What's our problem? Are our players relatively younger and those of the opposition relatively older? Obviously the future is uncharted, but some of these guys will be tomorrow's test players and I'd prefer not to see us getting pumped as a arbinger of our AB future
I have no idea.
Some people suggested that NZ de-prioritizes scrummaging at age group levels - but, I don't see how that would work in practice. There would be a massive advantage to props who bucked that directive.
Somehow, we seem to have plenty of decent props a few years later though.
-
@Chris-B said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
Some people suggested that NZ de-prioritizes scrummaging at age group levels
There is a restriction at 1st XV/U19 level for pushing in the scrums for safety reasons. A pack can push no more than 1.5 m so you won't see the same domination as you can at senior level. I don't know if a similar rule is in place in other countries. As I've mentioned previously there are quite a few converted schoolboy loose forwards who transition to the front row before the U20s.
-
@Bovidae said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@Chris-B said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
Some people suggested that NZ de-prioritizes scrummaging at age group levels
There is a restriction at 1st XV/U19 level for pushing in the scrums for safety reasons. A pack can push no more than 1.5 m so you won't see the same domination as you can at senior level. I don't know if a similar rule is in place in other countries. As I've mentioned previously there are quite a few converted schoolboy loose forwards who transition to the front row before the U20s.
That would be a reasonable explanation.
-
@Chris-B said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@canefan said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@Chris-B said in NZ U20 v France U20 (World Rugby U20 Championship):
@Tordah Yeah. Unless Laidlaw is Harry Potter and can wave a magic wand, his tight five aren't going to be much better than those who got beaten by the Aussie kids a month ago. And the expectation seems to be France will be better.
Without having paid much too attention, I'd guess France by plenty.
What's our problem? Are our players relatively younger and those of the opposition relatively older? Obviously the future is uncharted, but some of these guys will be tomorrow's test players and I'd prefer not to see us getting pumped as a arbinger of our AB future
I have no idea.
Some people suggested that NZ de-prioritizes scrummaging at age group levels - but, I don't see how that would work in practice. There would be a massive advantage to props who bucked that directive.
Somehow, we seem to have plenty of decent props a few years later though.
I know someone who's son moved to the UK as an 18 year old, he's in an English Prem club youth team. His experience was that they trained much harder there. Of course that doesn't necessarily translate into world domination at senior level