• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
505 Posts 64 Posters 21.6k Views
SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #451

    @Steve said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    @ACT-Crusader said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    Taylor, Barrett, Mo’unga, Fainga’anuku, Jordan and even Ennor all played well.

    Ennor gets unfair flack in my opinion. He's a decent player.

    I think Ennor has been much better this season than seasons prior

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #452

    @Steve said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    The people saying Jordan was a marginal call for the Allblacks squad need to delete their accounts.

    A batshit mental opinion.

    The boy is a freak.

    It's only the blues.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Steve on last edited by
    #453

    @Steve said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    Ennor

    Easier to look good in a team that's winning so easily.

    StargazerS ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by
    #454

    https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/football/crusaders-player-ratings-leicester-fainga-anuku-leads-the-way-as-champions-thrash-blues/ar-AA1cDuLW?ocid=hpmsn&pc=ACTE&cvid=1db8b24a6a11471c8f40c47efac9e292&ei=17

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by
    #455

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/300907721/crusaders-leicester-faingaanuku-runs-rampant-as-blues-nosedive-in-christchurch

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #456

    @Winger That's such a cliché.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #457

    @Stargazer said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    @Winger That's such a cliché.

    Unless you're Jordie against Italy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    wrote on last edited by
    #458

    Beyond embarrassing. Can only imagine what a full strength Saders outfit would have done to that shower. Good time for Rangi to move on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #459

    @Winger said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    @Steve said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    Ennor

    Easier to look good in a team that's winning so easily.

    Contributing to that winning is all that matters

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by
    #460

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #461

    @Bovidae said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    You have to accept that the breakdown is a mess with Gardner. Best to try to be dominant/physical and take your chances.

    AG was pants, but you play to the whistle. Blues ought to have just abandoned the rule book, grasped AG's indulgent style and let chaos prevail.

    Mind you one has to take one's hat off to the Saders's ability to lurk offside a whole match without being penalised out of the game.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #462

    @pakman it was pretty smart, saders were excellently prepared, obviously did what little homework on Gardner and Christie they needed and the blues doubled down and capitulated.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by
    #463

    Who are we likely to see come into the squad for the final? Really excited about this one, pretty confident we can win.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to SBW1 on last edited by
    #464

    @SBW1 I don't think any of the injured Crusaders are expected back for the Final. And it looks like they may need a replacement for Brodie McAlister, so that will be Quentin MacDonald or Ioane Moananu.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #465

    Finals are about applying pressure and Blues don't play a style that applies pressure.

    Their kicking game doesn't apply pressure and their attacking shape doesn't apply pressure.

    Their attacking shape if anything invites pressure by involving a lot of standing still, passing behind the gain line and slow developing plays. Anything but direct.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by SBW1
    #466

    The Chiefs v Brumbies game will be interesting, expecting a nail biter of a game. Saders would probably prefer facing the Brumbies at home. Macmillan said he was hoping tonight's game would see each team bash each other up. It was a statement by the Saders to towel up such a starstudded side.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    SBW1
    wrote on last edited by
    #467
    Stuff
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by Old Samurai Jack
    #468

    Wow.. didn't expect that. Pretty much contradicted what anyone said on the forum.
    Can I repeat what I have said previously a number of times? Blues loose forwards as a unit are not the sum of their parts (although Papalii was a soldier). And I will repeat once again, Clarke should not be anywhere near the All Blacks.
    OK, these Super finals have always been interesting because every game has different tactics depending on the game and opponents. Tonight the Crusaders attacked the breakdown, brought in the defenders, and exposed defensive holes on the wide channels. Next week, if it is the Chiefs, it won't be so easy. McMillian has proved to be Razor's equal and the bounce of the ball has decided things.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #469

    Notice there was no fucking around in the Crusaders 22 this week. The exits were excellent. Made a grumpy old man smile.

    1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #470

    What a hiding!

    The Crusaders played with fire in their bellies and ice in their veins. Most impressive.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.