SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Turnovers at key moments as well.
Maybe not great, but not utter shite like many other Blues AB's.
I don't think Paps has been any better than the much maligned Ioane bros. Granted, better than Barrett, Christie and the two fatties in the front row though.
-
Best kick all night by the Blues, by Eklund
-
@Tim said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Crusaders find gaps at will in Blues backline. The defence has been completely out smarted
Crusaders have just been running simple dummy lines and the blues have bought it every time, often several players in one movement.
Really bizarre.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Best kick all night by the Blues, by Eklund
Could be a good combo if Barrett can start throwing to the lineout...
-
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Only Blues who haven't damaged their AB chances are Sullivan & Paps
And Plummer...
Oh shut up
-
How does the TMO not know that should be a penalty instead of gifting the lineout throw to the Crusaders? You can't go pushing players.
-
We all know Foster wont select on form... so maybe everyone has already got their tickets booked?
-
-
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Only Blues who haven't damaged their AB chances are Sullivan & Paps
And Plummer...
Oh shut up
My feed is slightly delayed, I thought you were running multis, until my feed caught up.
-
@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
How does the TMO not know that should be a penalty instead of gifting the lineout throw to the Crusaders? You can't go pushing players.
Or the commentators.
Or the on-field ref. -
@Mattasaurus said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
We all know Foster wont select on form... so maybe everyone has already got their tickets booked?
Well team won't be getting picked on tonight's game I wouldn't think, the names will all be in by now.
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Canes4life said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Who was the Blues fan questioning Ardie’s work rate against the Brumbies last week?
Well I wouldn’t even have Ioane and Sotutu anywhere near the All Blacks. They’ve been absolutely hopeless when it’s mattered (two years running).
R Ioane and Telea have potentially played themselves out of starting roles tonight. They’ve been aweful.
It was me. I stand by it.
Hoskins should be dropped by the ABs.
Akira I don't think has been awful but yeah he's had his shot at test level - if he gets dropped so be it.
I personally think Ardie should be a specialist AB bench player where I think he could be so influential 2nd half and have a traditional 8 like Jacobson or Grace starting.
No way. Ardie is our best loose forward bu some distance. He has the engine to play 80 minutes. He needs to play 80.
-
@Dan54 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Mattasaurus said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
We all know Foster wont select on form... so maybe everyone has already got their tickets booked?
Well team won't be getting picked on tonight's game I wouldn't think, the names will all be in by now.
Everything wrong with the current system if Ofa and Laulala get picked. Alongside other Blues forwards.
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
The counter argument to 'you shouldn't select based on one game' is how many Super games these days are useful for test selection?
This tells me a lot more about Blues ABs than smashing Rebels, Tahs etc
This!!
You don’t flush the dunny on a smashing when it matters.
-
Leessssgoooooo Brumbies 😁
