• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
505 Posts 64 Posters 21.6k Views
SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #174

    @Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    Just plays connect the dots.

    Not even doing that well, either.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    Blues forwards made good go forward with pick and goes, then backs turned it into static sideways ball. ๐Ÿ˜•

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #176

    @antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    Gardner's refereeing of the ruck is a lottery.

    At least the crusaders look to have focused on that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #177

    @Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    @Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns

    Feels like the Blues might do more damage with a much narrower (initial) attack around the ruck.

    For the last month when thenpunch either side of the rick before hitting the fringes with their pace, they look amazing

    They do it for like 5 minutes a game. It's immensely frustrating

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #178

    Blues knackered, slowing it already

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    Blues plan was to throw it wide quickly rather than kicking wide? Great.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #180

    @Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    @Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns

    Feels like the Blues might do more damage with a much narrower (initial) attack around the ruck.

    Christie has gone into his shell in the last few weeks. He needs to snipe off the ruck. We are fanning out and itโ€™s easy cover.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #181

    @Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    @Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    Just plays connect the dots.

    Not even doing that well, either.

    I mean just plays the training patterns and won't break it - he's doing that very well!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    Classy

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #183

    Beautiful move

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #184

    Class vs arse

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #185

    Tonight is yet another reason why it's easiest just to assume the Crusaders are always tournament favourites...

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #186

    Note to Jordie: That's how you do it five metres out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #187

    Out coached. Backline plays are completely different.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #188

    Hook Barrett and Christie at half time.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    That was nice, and the pop wasn't easy

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    Looks like the Crusaders home record is going to continue. Lucky for the Chiefs they don't have to play there is they win.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #191

    @Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

    Tonight is yet another reason why it's easiest just to assume the Crusaders are always tournament favourites...

    Evening we win tomorrow they'll win next week

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #192

    That was soooo poor from those Blues cleaners. Two of them there and they both took out no one

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #193

    Jesus. Riccitelli right there, but just stands and watches then pats Leicester on the back.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.