SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Just plays connect the dots.
Not even doing that well, either.
-
@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Gardner's refereeing of the ruck is a lottery.
At least the crusaders look to have focused on that.
-
@Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns
Feels like the Blues might do more damage with a much narrower (initial) attack around the ruck.
For the last month when thenpunch either side of the rick before hitting the fringes with their pace, they look amazing
They do it for like 5 minutes a game. It's immensely frustrating
-
@Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns
Feels like the Blues might do more damage with a much narrower (initial) attack around the ruck.
Christie has gone into his shell in the last few weeks. He needs to snipe off the ruck. We are fanning out and itโs easy cover.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Just plays connect the dots.
Not even doing that well, either.
I mean just plays the training patterns and won't break it - he's doing that very well!
-
Classy
-
Note to Jordie: That's how you do it five metres out.
-
That was nice, and the pop wasn't easy
-
@Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Tonight is yet another reason why it's easiest just to assume the Crusaders are always tournament favourites...
Evening we win tomorrow they'll win next week