SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)

[Crucial]

BB has gone back to the slow soft nothing passes to players in a bad position like he was earlier in the season. Just playing with no mojo or positivity

[Machpants]

@Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns

Yeah he's doing well out there, but at what cost

[antipodean]

Gardner's refereeing of the ruck is a lottery.

[Machpants]

@Crucial said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

BB has gone back to the slow soft nothing passes to players in a bad position like he was earlier in the season. Just playing with no mojo or positivity

At least he is not kicking every ball

[Bones]

Christie (F) is shithouse. No eyes up footy again and comes back towards the defence instead of using the space they'd created on the open. Just plays connect the dots.

[Crucial]

@Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns

Paps and Akira. Neither are anywhere near the break down

[MN5]

@chimoaus said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Ofa and Nepo getting turned inside out tonight.

You speak like this is a new occurrence

[Gunner]

The difference in the way the Crusaders and Blues use the ball is immense.

Crusaders all running onto the ball, passes out in front.

Blues shovel it backwards at a huge amount of knots, to someone flat footed, and you’re lucky if the pass is out in front of the man maybe 1/2 the time.

[Donsteppa]

@Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns

Feels like the Blues might do more damage with a much narrower (initial) attack around the ruck.

[mariner4life]

That's a terrible penalty

No release, and he didn't even have hands on the ball

[Victor Meldrew]

@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Just plays connect the dots.

Not even doing that well, either.

[Tim]

Blues forwards made good go forward with pick and goes, then backs turned it into static sideways ball.

[Bones]

@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Gardner's refereeing of the ruck is a lottery.

At least the crusaders look to have focused on that.

[mariner4life]

@Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns

Feels like the Blues might do more damage with a much narrower (initial) attack around the ruck.

For the last month when thenpunch either side of the rick before hitting the fringes with their pace, they look amazing

They do it for like 5 minutes a game. It's immensely frustrating

[Machpants]

Blues knackered, slowing it already

[Tim]

Blues plan was to throw it wide quickly rather than kicking wide? Great.

[ACT Crusader]

@Donsteppa said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Stockcar86 said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns

Feels like the Blues might do more damage with a much narrower (initial) attack around the ruck.

Christie has gone into his shell in the last few weeks. He needs to snipe off the ruck. We are fanning out and it’s easy cover.

[Bones]

@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

@Bones said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):

Just plays connect the dots.

Not even doing that well, either.

I mean just plays the training patterns and won't break it - he's doing that very well!

[Mattasaurus]

Classy

[Machpants]

Beautiful move