SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil)
-
Sullivan's the only Blue back who looks competent ATM
-
@antipodean said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Why is the Blues pattern of play to use the least imposing tight forwards to carry the ball up? Nepo and Ricci are useless at it. A three legged donkey would be more effective.
It's always been the same under Leon
Sick attack coach.
-
Beady's having a shocker.
-
@Nepia said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
The Blues look so disorganised that they're actually going to need to rely on individual brilliance to make a game of this.
So like every other time they've played the crusaders in the last decade?
-
@Victor-Meldrew when did he last dominate a game?
-
Better D from the Blues there.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Beady's having a shocker.
No, this is better than average this year
-
This post is deleted!
-
This plan to have Dalton hanging out on the wing is screwing Blues at breakdowns
-
@chimoaus said in SF: Crusaders (Good) v Blues (Evil):
Fuck Ofa having a shocker.
Carter-esque compared to Beauden B