Super Rugby - Who's it going to be?
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bovidae" data-cid="596106" data-time="1468360278"><p>The Lions are guaranteed a home QF but could miss out on a home SF and final if they don't win, as they could fall to 3rd (PD is good though). It's a calculated risk but it has opened the door for a NZ team to secure homefield advantage during the playoffs.<br><br><br>
I assume the NZ teams will play the AC1 teams (Stormers, Bulls etc) next season and the Lions only play the Aust teams from outside the African conferences. So their draw is tougher this year.</p></blockquote>
Does the conference makeup stay the same? So the Lions will still have the Kings and Jaguars in their conference?<br><br>
That's pretty shit that they get two completely new franchises who still have their training wheels on. Meanwhile the Hurricanes, for example, get four ex/current Champs! -
<p>An incredible final weekend of Rugby with so maby interesting match ups.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Amazing to think one of 4 NZ teams in the final round could top the conference.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Stoked I am going to miss the Chiefs game as going to a thing up in Auckland where I will be the odd one out as everyone else will be horsey types who don't really follow rugby! Good times</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Don Frye" data-cid="596112" data-time="1468361320">
<div>
<p>Does the conference makeup stay the same? So the Lions will still have the Kings and Jaguars in their conference?<br><br>
That's pretty shit that they get two completely new franchises who still have their training wheels on. Meanwhile the Hurricanes, for example, get four ex/current Champs!</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Who said life was fair! But doesn't that make it a better team and player, that you can compete against the best? Isn't that what we all have been arguing for in SR, more quality than quantity?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The fact that numbers have been dwindling at stadiums in the Republic and on TV suggest that SANZAR has some serious issues at hand. Unfortunately it is lead by a plonker.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>PS. Money talks and bullshit walks.</p> -
I've made my bet at the TAB. I have slapped down $25 on the chiefs to win. I was told if I wait until after this round the odds will go down. Part of my bet is based on Liam<br>Messam playing.<br><br>I realise that Liam had mixed results as an All Black especially when he first started as an AB. But he is a very fine Super Rugby player and he really buys into Chiefs Mana.<br><br>He will be worth his weight in gold in the dressing room. Heck, if Liam Messam looked me in the face and told me to play with pride for the Chiefs whanau it would mean something<br>to me. There was an awesome little snippet of him before a playoff match started a few years ago. I wish I had it on tape. He looked fired up and said a few key words in Te Reo<br>admist getting his general point across in everyday english. It worked well. He plays with pride and I think my $25 could pay if he plays. Which I concede is an if.<br><br>This may be a bit far fetched but he has been one of the more consistent Chiefs I have seen play out of any chiefs team.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bovidae" data-cid="596106" data-time="1468360278"><p>
The Lions are guaranteed a home QF but could miss out on a home SF and final if they don't win, as they<strong> could fall to 3rd</strong> (PD is good though). It's a calculated risk but it has opened the door for a NZ team to secure homefield advantage during the playoffs.<br><br></p></blockquote>
<br>
No they can't. They'd be at worst 2nd. Because Conferences. It's not points. Brumbies/Tahs and Stormers can't get past them. If they win their QF they host an SF. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="596583" data-time="1468531134">
<div>
<p>No they can't. They'd be at worst 2nd. Because Conferences. It's not points. Brumbies/Tahs and Stormers can't get past them. If they win their QF they host an SF.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yes, I realised my mistake yesterday and was meaning to correct it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Lions are either #1 or #2. The Stormers are set as #3 and the Brumbies or Tahs are #4. Any of the NZ teams can finish 1st, 2nd, 5th, 6th or 7th. The Sharks or Bulls will be #8.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/82168543/sixtry-sharks-book-playoff-place'>http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/82168543/sixtry-sharks-book-playoff-place</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Sharks will be seeded eighth for the quarterfinals, which means they will face the team that finishes top in the overall standings, either compatriots the Lions or the Chiefs. Their opponents will be decided on Saturday.</p>
<p> </p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Seriously, who are the dumb motherfuckers who write/check/publish this shit?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not only apparently a total lack of understanding of basic mathematics, but the permutations have been discussed ad nauseum for several weeks.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You simply have to be both incompetent and as thick as pigshit.</p> -
So Lions could get a BP and finish on same as canes, they will have same wins, so would that then go to the match the canes hammered them in? <br><br>
So the table topping brumbies(surely) and stormers both finish with less points than Chiefs, highlanders and crusaders.... -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="597313" data-time="1468661753">
<div>
<p>So Lions could get a BP and finish on same as canes, they will have same wins, so would that then go to the match the canes hammered them in?<br><br>
So the table topping brumbies(surely) and stormers both finish with less points than Chiefs, highlanders and crusaders....</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It goes to points difference I think and tthe Lions have a better PD than the 'canes.</p> -
<p>Lions/Canes vs Sharks</p>
<p>Lions/Canes vs Saders</p>
<p>Stormers vs Chiefs</p>
<p>Brumbies/Tahs vs Highlanders</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Lions just need a bonus point to go top and face the Sharks. Then the Canes and Saders will play again in the quarters.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Brumbies just need a bonus point and will face the Highlanders.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="597317" data-time="1468661916"><p>It goes to points difference I think and tthe Lions have a better PD than the 'canes.</p></blockquote>
<br>
Ah ok, another daft thing IMO, if tied go back to if they played one another, if not, then points diff. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Higgins" data-cid="595665" data-time="1468113342">
<div>
<p>Thanks Stargazer, so it looks like a Canes thrashing of the Crusaders and a close Highlanders victory over the Chiefs next weekend will see the Hurricanes top the Conference.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> :yes: :good1: :good: :yahoo: :drinks:</p> -
<p>If tied it goes to most wins, then points differential.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They can't go by who won in round-robin because some teams don't play each other and some teams play each other twice.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="michaelmac" data-cid="597335" data-time="1468662926">
<div>
<p>If tied it goes to most wins, then points differential.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They can't go by who won in round-robin because some teams don't play each other and some teams play each other twice.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I still don't see why that should prevent them from using head to head. If the teams split their games or didn't play you could just move on to points difference.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="597337" data-time="1468663839">
<div>
<p>I still don't see why that should prevent them from using head to head. If the teams split their games or didn't play you could just move on to points difference.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm happy enough with points differential. Home advantage, playing off the back of travel or a couple of hard games, can all confer significant advantage to one team for a one-off game.</p>
