Canes v Tahs (and drinks?)
-
If that's a try then fucking LOL
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="595472" data-time="1468059993"><p>Skelton has been leaving his feet a bit at the ruck. But as mentioned, you get that sort of stuff at most breakdowns. Just hurts a bit more when the bloke landing on you is 140 odd kegs.</p></blockquote>
<br>
To be fair to Pollock, Shields neck was was hit kind of awkwardly and it did sort of snap back. -
<p>That was given last week.....</p>
-
So Foley had possesion, then it was knocked out of his hands by TJP. Is that a knock on? What did we decide in that other thread?
-
That was a nice run by TJP but if he was smarter you grab the arm, but not play at the ball<br><br><br>
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="595485" data-time="1468060321"><p>So Foley had possesion, then it was knocked out of his hands by TJP. Is that a knock on? What did we decide in that other thread?</p></blockquote>
<br>
Nah this one was different <br><br><br>
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
This is what we ended the other thread with:<br><br><blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crucial" data-cid="594481" data-time="1467783504"><p>The relevant point (according to the refs directives) is who lost possession not how they lost it. <br>
West had possession, Eves never did. <br>
If West had let go of the ball in a pass before Eves made contact then Eve's knocked the ball forward. If West was still in contact (not control Mr Marshall), then just like scoring a try, he remains in possession. If he then loses the ball backward (even if it is touched by Eve's), it is play on.</p></blockquote>
<br>
So should have been a try based on that.