Foster, Robertson etc
-
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew almost certainly, personally i dont think its out of line for the top job, an assistant doesn't get a say on who the head coach is....but a head coach gets a say on the assitant
Neither do I if that style and culture produces the desired results. Just commenting that NZR take personal characteristics into account.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Interestingly, this is what I hear what makes Razr such a good leader/manager, plus the people he surrounds himself with, he leaves no stone un turned in his quest...he might not even be a great coach per se, but its his preparation and ability to get the best of his team that sets him apart.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job. -
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.
And it is a mission statement not vision statement,
That is we’re you put you plans,values etc in to. -
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.
And it is a mission statement not vision statement,
That is we’re you put you plans,values etc in to.I hope you don't coach people how to respond to posts on forums?
-
@Nepia said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.
And it is a mission statement not vision statement,
That is we’re you put you plans,values etc in to.I hope you don't coach people how to respond to posts on forums?
No I don’t need too,
Just how to play and get to their eventual goals.
I am actually running a coaching session now believe it or not.
Using my coaching app coaches eye for video anlaysis. -
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Nepia said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.
And it is a mission statement not vision statement,
That is we’re you put you plans,values etc in to.I hope you don't coach people how to respond to posts on forums?
No I don’t need too,
Just how to play and get to their eventual goals.
I am actually running a coaching session now believe it or not.
Using my coaching app coaches eye for video anlaysis.Tsf had a rebrand?
-
@Bones said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Nepia said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.
And it is a mission statement not vision statement,
That is we’re you put you plans,values etc in to.I hope you don't coach people how to respond to posts on forums?
No I don’t need too,
Just how to play and get to their eventual goals.
I am actually running a coaching session now believe it or not.
Using my coaching app coaches eye for video anlaysis.Tsf had a rebrand?
I am not talking about your fantasies.
Coaches eye look it up American base app used by coaches here in Australia. -
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Bones said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Nepia said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.
And it is a mission statement not vision statement,
That is we’re you put you plans,values etc in to.I hope you don't coach people how to respond to posts on forums?
No I don’t need too,
Just how to play and get to their eventual goals.
I am actually running a coaching session now believe it or not.
Using my coaching app coaches eye for video anlaysis.Tsf had a rebrand?
I am not talking about your fantasies.
Coaches eye look it up American base app used by coaches here in Australia.Very cool man
-
@Bones said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Bones said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Nepia said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.
And it is a mission statement not vision statement,
That is we’re you put you plans,values etc in to.I hope you don't coach people how to respond to posts on forums?
No I don’t need too,
Just how to play and get to their eventual goals.
I am actually running a coaching session now believe it or not.
Using my coaching app coaches eye for video anlaysis.Tsf had a rebrand?
I am not talking about your fantasies.
Coaches eye look it up American base app used by coaches here in Australia.Very cool man
A smattering of sarcasm I feel.😀
-
@ploughboy said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@kiwi_expat said in Foster:
Was flicking between the Barbarians match and the All Blacks. Really showed who is the coaching guru out of the 2 games, the difference in cohesion and tactics. We certainly shouldn't be giving Robertson any credit whatsoever for taking a rag-tag group and turning them into a winning team in two coaching sessions.
Razor had 2, yes 2 training sessions with this team that beat a All Blacks B side, who had already been together for weeks and already had a win on tour. Took a group that haven't played together, from different countries and languages and beat a NZ XV team that had weeks of training together including another game. Then we flick to All Blacks with the Foster swapping players game after game with little clue of a game-plan. I certainly didn't waste much more time watching the aimless kicking and disorganized mess in Black.
Also McDonald has had more failures than successes, always outsmarted by Robertson in head to heads. Razor does it his way and doesn't have to call in the likes of Schmidt and other international or ex-international coaches to help him out. McDonald seems to lack the technical skills that Robertson displays in his game-planning, strategy & team selections. NZRU adore Leon though, despite his limited success and his inability to counter Razor's pragmatic tactical nous and astute calculated game-plans.
yeah what a legend 277 caps in baa team. only three havnt played internation rugby in the starting team against 116 in nz team.against 6 Abs that two had 83 caps combinded,.
if you carnt get that team organized you would be pretty poorHow many test caps do the ABs now have and Foster has had them all season?
-
@Joans-Town-Jones said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@ploughboy said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@kiwi_expat said in Foster:
Was flicking between the Barbarians match and the All Blacks. Really showed who is the coaching guru out of the 2 games, the difference in cohesion and tactics. We certainly shouldn't be giving Robertson any credit whatsoever for taking a rag-tag group and turning them into a winning team in two coaching sessions.
Razor had 2, yes 2 training sessions with this team that beat a All Blacks B side, who had already been together for weeks and already had a win on tour. Took a group that haven't played together, from different countries and languages and beat a NZ XV team that had weeks of training together including another game. Then we flick to All Blacks with the Foster swapping players game after game with little clue of a game-plan. I certainly didn't waste much more time watching the aimless kicking and disorganized mess in Black.
Also McDonald has had more failures than successes, always outsmarted by Robertson in head to heads. Razor does it his way and doesn't have to call in the likes of Schmidt and other international or ex-international coaches to help him out. McDonald seems to lack the technical skills that Robertson displays in his game-planning, strategy & team selections. NZRU adore Leon though, despite his limited success and his inability to counter Razor's pragmatic tactical nous and astute calculated game-plans.
yeah what a legend 277 caps in baa team. only three havnt played internation rugby in the starting team against 116 in nz team.against 6 Abs that two had 83 caps combinded,.
if you carnt get that team organized you would be pretty poorHow many test caps do the ABs now have and Foster has had them all season?
and just to add: "277 caps in baa team" across how many languages, how many countries, how many playing styles and strategies?
-
@Joans-Town-Jones said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@ploughboy said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@kiwi_expat said in Foster:
Was flicking between the Barbarians match and the All Blacks. Really showed who is the coaching guru out of the 2 games, the difference in cohesion and tactics. We certainly shouldn't be giving Robertson any credit whatsoever for taking a rag-tag group and turning them into a winning team in two coaching sessions.
Razor had 2, yes 2 training sessions with this team that beat a All Blacks B side, who had already been together for weeks and already had a win on tour. Took a group that haven't played together, from different countries and languages and beat a NZ XV team that had weeks of training together including another game. Then we flick to All Blacks with the Foster swapping players game after game with little clue of a game-plan. I certainly didn't waste much more time watching the aimless kicking and disorganized mess in Black.
Also McDonald has had more failures than successes, always outsmarted by Robertson in head to heads. Razor does it his way and doesn't have to call in the likes of Schmidt and other international or ex-international coaches to help him out. McDonald seems to lack the technical skills that Robertson displays in his game-planning, strategy & team selections. NZRU adore Leon though, despite his limited success and his inability to counter Razor's pragmatic tactical nous and astute calculated game-plans.
yeah what a legend 277 caps in baa team. only three havnt played internation rugby in the starting team against 116 in nz team.against 6 Abs that two had 83 caps combinded,.
if you carnt get that team organized you would be pretty poorHow many test caps do the ABs now have and Foster has had them all season?
i dont think you understood the post
-
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.I was replying to your comment on how you thought the best coaching set-up worked - which wasn't about how the coach was selected.
Fair enough to use a mission statement to see how a prospective coach thinks and it setting goal, but actually delivering results is a wee bit different than articulating a Mission statement.
-
@nostrildamus said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Joans-Town-Jones said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@ploughboy said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@kiwi_expat said in Foster:
Was flicking between the Barbarians match and the All Blacks. Really showed who is the coaching guru out of the 2 games, the difference in cohesion and tactics. We certainly shouldn't be giving Robertson any credit whatsoever for taking a rag-tag group and turning them into a winning team in two coaching sessions.
Razor had 2, yes 2 training sessions with this team that beat a All Blacks B side, who had already been together for weeks and already had a win on tour. Took a group that haven't played together, from different countries and languages and beat a NZ XV team that had weeks of training together including another game. Then we flick to All Blacks with the Foster swapping players game after game with little clue of a game-plan. I certainly didn't waste much more time watching the aimless kicking and disorganized mess in Black.
Also McDonald has had more failures than successes, always outsmarted by Robertson in head to heads. Razor does it his way and doesn't have to call in the likes of Schmidt and other international or ex-international coaches to help him out. McDonald seems to lack the technical skills that Robertson displays in his game-planning, strategy & team selections. NZRU adore Leon though, despite his limited success and his inability to counter Razor's pragmatic tactical nous and astute calculated game-plans.
yeah what a legend 277 caps in baa team. only three havnt played internation rugby in the starting team against 116 in nz team.against 6 Abs that two had 83 caps combinded,.
if you carnt get that team organized you would be pretty poorHow many test caps do the ABs now have and Foster has had them all season?
and just to add: "277 caps in baa team" across how many languages, how many countries, how many playing styles and strategies?
Actually the game where Baabaas were successful the majority of players came from La Rochelle, the team that Ronan O'Gara coaches. The coach who never gets mentioned? (I know I like O'Gara as a coach, and it annoys me he doesn't get any credit)
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
yeah - obviously the head coach isn't the driver of the team's culture and ultimately mindset...
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Victor-Meldrew said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Chris said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Crucial said in Foster, Robertson etc:
@Windows97 said in Foster, Robertson etc:
However simply speaking it is quite an interesting paradox.
"Give me the 23 best rugby players in New Zealand and I will give you the world cup!!"
"Very good Mr Roberston/Joseph, and of course we'll give you the best coach's in NZ to work with as well".
"Heavens No!! I only want to work with these specific people and couldn't care less about the skills, talents or ability of any other coach".
Whilst of course the above is facetious one mark of a "good coach" is that they can get the best players in the country and form them into the best team. It would seem a little bit odd that they wouldn't take a similar approach with the coaching team. Get the best coach's there are and make them into the best team.
There's no paradox. Coaches have different methods and philosophies. It stands to reason that they won't necessarily all work well together. Same does apply to players in some circumstances. eg the three best loose forwards in the country may not create the best loose combination.
Then you get coaches that are best at being head and those that can assist.
Last thing we want is another Hart/Wyllie scenario.To have a vision were you want to go and get results a mission statement driven by One HC works the best IMO.
Teamwork and working together is way, way more important than who's in charge. Ask Eddie Jones.
The coach of a national sports team will need a plan to get where he/she wants to go (i.e. get the best out of his players) but I find lot of vision statement stuff complete bollocks.
Well if you were in the coaching profession as I am
It is my paid job 7 days a week, The first thing you have to put together and deliver is a mission statement, or you will not even get an interview.
So you are way out of touch with how coaches are interviewed and selected.
No mission statement no job.I was replying to your comment on how you thought the best coaching set-up worked - which wasn't about how the coach was selected.
Fair enough to use a mission statement to see how a prospective coach thinks and it setting goal, but actually delivering results is a wee bit different than articulating a Mission statement.
It is where the coach sets out his plan,values ,KPIs,Results and how he thinks he gets to that end result.
My point is with one Hc coach and one plan the results are easier to get to than having a set up of 2 HCs was my point,like a Razor/Joseph scenario were both coaches will have had their own way of achieving results and they both are after the same results but are trying to get there 2 different ways .
That can cause confusion,a seperation in team goals and lack of unity.
Everyone has to buy into the way the HC is setting things out going forward or it will never will work.
