• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks v All Blacks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.5k Posts 101 Posters 111.9k Views
Springboks v All Blacks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #341

    Good to see they've given Akira a shot at redemption vs the Boks. Shat himself in both games last year and seemed to put a downer on the rest of his season after a magic start vs OZ.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #342

    @mariner4life said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    So I guess the Ireland debacle was all Taylor and Reece's fault aye?

    It is ok, Shannon is back. He'll be a dynamo off the bench. I suppose.
    I'll guess we'll never see Tom Robinson in the ABs at this rate. Is there a ginger cap?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #343

    @Duluth said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Well if Ardie gets injured we will see Akira at number 8, where he played a while ago. Eek.

    I thought it had been ages.. looked it up and it wasn’t that long ago

    He had a couple of starts at 8 for the Blues last year. The year before that he played more at 8 than 6

    I read somewhere despite all his times at 6 for the blues over his career he played more 8.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #344

    Good to see our best hooker finally start a test

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to stodders on last edited by
    #345

    @stodders said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Duluth said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Larger image:

    alt text

    I'll not mention the back row combination apart from saying they have to fire in this game or the experiment needs to be scrapped.

    With Havili at 12 and Barrett at 15, I expect to see a territorial kicking game. Clarke and Jordan are good kick chasers too, so expect to see the Bok back 3 put under pressure.

    Back row under huge pressure.

    So is the backline. AS/BB’s kicking games haven’t been good enough. Neither has the chase. Havili has looked like a fullback playing 2nd against good defensive teams, RI needs to work on his passing game, JB needs to keep his error rate down.

    Hard to be confident.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #346

    A step in the right direction.

    Can't see us winning but hopefully a better effort than the rubbish served up at the Cake Tin

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #347

    Lomax on in the 2nd half. Yikes.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #348

    @kev said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @stodders said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Duluth said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Larger image:

    alt text

    I'll not mention the back row combination apart from saying they have to fire in this game or the experiment needs to be scrapped.

    With Havili at 12 and Barrett at 15, I expect to see a territorial kicking game. Clarke and Jordan are good kick chasers too, so expect to see the Bok back 3 put under pressure.

    Back row under huge pressure.

    So is the backline. AS/BB’s kicking games haven’t been good enough. Neither has the chase. Havili has looked like a fullback playing 2nd against good defensive teams, RI needs to work on his passing game, JB needs to keep his error rate down.

    Hard to be confident.

    There might be a few edits on the prediction page 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #349

    @akan004 said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Lomax on in the 2nd half. Yikes.

    The Boks have the bomb squad. Not sure what moniker you'd give the AB replacement front row.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #350

    @Duluth said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Larger image:

    alt text

    Happy with that except for bench loosie.

    boobooB TheMojomanT 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • GrooterG Online
    GrooterG Online
    Grooter
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #351

    @Bones funny thing is Frizell was in fact a goal keeper

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #352

    @nostrildamus said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @stodders I'm a bit surprised to see Reece gone. Thought he played well. Happy to see Clarke back of course. I guess they wanted a little more brawn.

    Sorry for Reece. He's dangerous. But like the bigger Clarke. Shame they could get him on the bench, but QT covers midfield I suppose.

    kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #353

    @booboo said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Duluth said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Larger image:

    alt text

    Happy with that except for bench loosie.

    Hang on. Would have preferred Fakatava over Ginge.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mackerzzzz
    wrote on last edited by
    #354
    Stuff

    A typically shocking team...

    Also I thought Angus was suspended?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Mackerzzzz on last edited by
    #355

    @Mackerzzzz said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Stuff

    A typically shocking team...

    Also I thought Angus was suspended?

    Got a week off for going to a how to tackle course

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CanerbryC Offline
    CanerbryC Offline
    Canerbry
    wrote on last edited by
    #356

    Can only imagine Reece is hurt. Huge confidence call in Clarke based on, um, what, Fozzie's off-the-wall genius?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #357

    Wish they would play Jordan at 15. The problem is BB is a crap goal kicker so his brother has to play.

    BB is on borrowed time if he keeps trotting out nothing but aimless midfield bombs.

    At least they improved the front row.

    TheMojomanT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TheMojomanT Offline
    TheMojomanT Offline
    TheMojoman
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #358

    @booboo said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @Duluth said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    Larger image:

    alt text

    Happy with that except for bench loosie.

    Bravo on starting Taukei’aho but surprised that Taylor isn’t on the bench? Also should’ve started Barrett at 6 with Vaa’i at lock with Akira fresh off the bench running against a tiring Bok pack. I’m not a Frizell fan at Test level & I’d be pleasantly surprised if he adds much off the bench.

    Clarke is a bold pick given he hasn’t played in what..2 months?

    S broughieB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    wrote on last edited by
    #359

    Let's hope it has been drummed into the team that they have to start well. It has been a while since they have.

    Boks and the crowd will feed on any momentum they can get. Need to starve them, starting from kick off. Win the toss and kick long. Then sit in Bok territory and force them to play. And when they overplay (which I think they will if they get frustrated and the crowd gets on their back), broken field opportunities will present themselves.

    No dumb penalties to relieve pressure and give Boks field position. No missed tackles to give Boks momentum. No messing about in the 22 (unless there's a clear overlap and space out wide to make easy metres).

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expatK Offline
    kiwi_expat
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #360

    @booboo said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @nostrildamus said in Springboks v All Blacks I:

    @stodders I'm a bit surprised to see Reece gone. Thought he played well. Happy to see Clarke back of course. I guess they wanted a little more brawn.

    Sorry for Reece. He's dangerous. But like the bigger Clarke. Shame they could get him on the bench, but QT covers midfield I suppose.

    Reece isn't small, he's literally a ball of muscle, only 178cm and weighs 99kg, which is heavier than Tupaea.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Springboks v All Blacks I
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.