NH International Rugby
-
@Catogrande said in NH International Rugby:
@MiketheSnow Was it RA's take or was this the popular vote? I know he was doing a vote.
Think that was his first selection before the vote
-
@MiketheSnow said in NH International Rugby:
@Catogrande said in NH International Rugby:
@MiketheSnow Was it RA's take or was this the popular vote? I know he was doing a vote.
Think that was his first selection before the vote
In which case, imo, he’s no fucking analyst. Ludlum over Curry or Underhill = loss at openside. Curry over Billy V = loss at 8. Platt the guys where their strengths lie. Ludlum is o good 6 and and ok 7. Not our best 6 and nowhere near our best 7. Curry is a great 7, a bloody good 6 and not a no8’s arsehole. Why would you pick that combo?
Aus play a high tempo game and we’ve seen god knows his many times that simply trying to tie them down to a slower tempo doesn’t work unless you have both the players and the game plan.
We’d be fucked with that selection. Mind you, I think we’re fucked anyway. I’d just like to see us in play some rugby whilst being fucked.
-
@Catogrande said in NH International Rugby:
@MiketheSnow said in NH International Rugby:
@Catogrande said in NH International Rugby:
@MiketheSnow Was it RA's take or was this the popular vote? I know he was doing a vote.
Think that was his first selection before the vote
In which case, imo, he’s no fucking analyst. Ludlum over Curry or Underhill = loss at openside. Curry over Billy V = loss at 8. Platt the guys where their strengths lie. Ludlum is o good 6 and and ok 7. Not our best 6 and nowhere near our best 7. Curry is a great 7, a bloody good 6 and not a no8’s arsehole. Why would you pick that combo?
Aus play a high tempo game and we’ve seen god knows his many times that simply trying to tie them down to a slower tempo doesn’t work unless you have both the players and the game plan.
We’d be fucked with that selection. Mind you, I think we’re fucked anyway. I’d just like to see us in play some rugby whilst being fucked.
I did it by the numbers
6 Lawes
7 Curry
8 Ludlum -
Ah. Ok. Still not good though. Ludlum=6. Never an 8. And fuck those that say all the back row positions are interchangeable.
-
-
@Daffy-Jaffy A slightly longer highlights video was posted in the June - July Internationals 2022 thread.
-
@Daffy-Jaffy First rugby post given I just watched the England-Barbarian game in full:
- I think 11 of the starters were French plus all of the replacements, French coaching team too. So they're playing for their boss
- France really have huge depth and the Barbarians weren't just playing festival rugby ... they were hitting those rucks, and you can see Sean Edwards influence in that defence
- Can't tell anything from that about England from that except the defense was so bad that I wonder if Eddie and his two new no-name sidekicks have gelled yet (my bad - I can't name either of them off the top of my head).
- I just have a sneaky feeling they'll get home 2-1 in a tight series with Eddie reverting to experience and a lot of tactical kicking. Hope I'm wrong though as I like Dave Rennie and the rugby world need Australia to be strong again
- Nice fairwell for George Kruis. England used to have four top class locks including Kruis. Now really down to one or two depending if Lawes plays at 6 or lock
- Marcus Smith plays a lot like a kiwi 10 - no higher compliment I can think of!
-
The big takeaway was England got thrashed by 14 men
-
Hate to think what this South African and England teams would do to the NZ under 20 team
-
SA 10 looks the real deal
Size, poise, and great decision making
Great final try from England though
-
No wooden spoon for us this tournament
-
Both teams to finish ahead of Wales and Scotland
-
-
@Steven-Harris said in NH International Rugby:
Hate to think what this South African and England teams would do to the NZ under 20 team
That sounds very familiar...
-
Second round
-
-
@MiketheSnow said in NH International Rugby:
@Bovidae said in NH International Rugby:
Are the English 9 and 10 the sons of?
Yes
Grayson and..?