2022 Black Ferns
-
The findings of the review were released in Auckland on Monday. It spanned more than 30 pages and offered 26 recommendations.
The reviewers said the on-tour situation was “not well managed or monitored and should have been escalated.”
The report identified key themes centring on the high performance environment, management and leadership structures, communication, health, wellbeing and culture. -
Yeah this is the article I read. Fucking what? Reads to me like the findings, recommendations, and plans are just a random selection of words.
New Zealand Herald: Live: Black Ferns cultural and environmental review findings revealed.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12517118&ref=rss -
I like this one best
Create an environment that is safe and inclusive with regard to culture, gender and
sexuality (and address any gaps in these capabilities). This capability should be assessed
by credible experts;
Basically every review has this in, despite this being for a team of one specific biological gender. AFAIK a trans woman can't play for the Black Ferns.
Unless I'm getting the terminology mixed up?
-
@machpants I would imagine it covers not just players but support staff too (i.e. male coaches, physios etc)
-
@kiwimurph Yeah I heard reports author on radio saying more women in and around the team would improve culture but at the end of the day they had to be the most qualified people too.
It does seem a little strange that it is a playing group of young, mostly Polynesian women and the support staff are almost all old, white men.
Haven't read the report (coz Fern) but it does seem like the two groups would have practically nothing in common apart from the core footy.
-
Mentioned not very often in the articles is the recommendation that players need to be able to take criticism as pro/high performance athletes. You wonder how much of it is a disconnect between the harshness of pro vs the niceness of women’s rugby. All my female rugby playing mates just love the touchy feely-ness of their teams. They’re nothing like a high performance arena, from my experience in high performance military
-
@machpants said in 2022 Black Ferns:
Mentioned not very often in the articles is the recommendation that players need to be able to take criticism as pro/high performance athletes. You wonder how much of it is a disconnect between the harshness of pro vs the niceness of women’s rugby. All my female rugby playing mates just love the touchy feely-ness of their teams. They’re nothing like a high performance arena, from my experience in high performance military
In my experience there's a near complete lack of piss taking in women's rugby - they're unbelievably supportive. I've also had to explain to some men who have obviously never been in high performance/ stress environments that someone giving you shit isn't a fluffybunny. If they're not teasing you they don't care.
-
@antipodean said in 2022 Black Ferns:
@machpants said in 2022 Black Ferns:
Mentioned not very often in the articles is the recommendation that players need to be able to take criticism as pro/high performance athletes. You wonder how much of it is a disconnect between the harshness of pro vs the niceness of women’s rugby. All my female rugby playing mates just love the touchy feely-ness of their teams. They’re nothing like a high performance arena, from my experience in high performance military
In my experience there's a near complete lack of piss taking in women's rugby - they're unbelievably supportive. I've also had to explain to some men who have obviously never been in high performance/ stress environments that someone giving you shit isn't a fluffybunny. If they're not teasing you they don't care.
Exactly, it’s like Munster in the good old days deciding to play ‘A good heart these days is hard to find’ to the player who just got diagnosed with a heart defect, it’s craic!
-
@machpants said in 2022 Black Ferns:
Mentioned not very often in the articles is the recommendation that players need to be able to take criticism as pro/high performance athletes. You wonder how much of it is a disconnect between the harshness of pro vs the niceness of women’s rugby. All my female rugby playing mates just love the touchy feely-ness of their teams. They’re nothing like a high performance arena, from my experience in high performance military
Well, that's a bit of a no brainer then. Women's rugby has only just started on the path to pro/hp rugby and still isn't full-time pro.
@antipodean said in 2022 Black Ferns:In my experience there's a near complete lack of piss taking in women's rugby - they're unbelievably supportive. I've also had to explain to some men who have obviously never been in high performance/ stress environments that someone giving you shit isn't a fluffybunny. If they're not teasing you they don't care.
That's a male perspective. Why would it be the same for women's rugby? Women are wired differently. Also depends on what your definition of "piss taking" and "teasing" is, I guess. And who is doing the "piss taking" towards whom.
-
@stargazer said in 2022 Black Ferns:
@machpants said in 2022 Black Ferns:
Mentioned not very often in the articles is the recommendation that players need to be able to take criticism as pro/high performance athletes. You wonder how much of it is a disconnect between the harshness of pro vs the niceness of women’s rugby. All my female rugby playing mates just love the touchy feely-ness of their teams. They’re nothing like a high performance arena, from my experience in high performance military
Well, that's a bit of a no brainer then. Women's rugby has only just started on the path to pro/hp rugby and still isn't full-time pro.
Chicken or the egg?
@antipodean said in 2022 Black Ferns:
In my experience there's a near complete lack of piss taking in women's rugby - they're unbelievably supportive. I've also had to explain to some men who have obviously never been in high performance/ stress environments that someone giving you shit isn't a fluffybunny. If they're not teasing you they don't care.
That's a male perspective. Why would it be the same for women's rugby? Women are wired differently. Also depends on what your definition of "piss taking" and "teasing" is, I guess. And who is doing the "piss taking" towards whom.
Friends/ mates ribbing each other use truth and humour, otherwise the statement wouldn't land and it wouldn't be taken in good nature. It would be a baseless or intensely personal attack intended to hurt. Doing it in this manner is a good way to bond and to critique/ criticise in a supportive environment.
-
-
@bovidae Isn't this a repeat of what happened before one of the previous (maybe even the last) Women's RWC? I recall the head coach stepping up in the year of the WRWC; wasn't that how Moore got the gig?
Edit: yep, found it. He replaced Greg Smith who was banned for referee abuse.
Greg Smith quits Black Ferns
The head coach of the New Zealand women's rugby team Greg Smith has resigned after serving a ban for abusing match officials.
-
@stargazer Yeah, Greg Smith was originally named as the coach. His issues were outside of the Black Ferns environment (verbal abuse of a ref in Waikato club rugby IIRC).
I see Bunting has been mentioned as a possible candidate. Whoever gets the position will have some challenges.
-
-
I haven't read the report, just this article. What a mess to clean up, with a home world cup only months away
-
@stargazer said in 2022 Black Ferns:
@bovidae Yep, definitely difficult to take over this late, but Bunting has a great track record. And he's got the assistance of Smith and maybe Henry.
After his work rebuilding the 7s team he is an excellent choice. The article suggests that Moore still had support from some of the players. It sounds much like the way that the women's Black sticks coach got pushed out
New Zealand Rugby accepts Black Ferns Cultural and Environmental review findings
