All Blacks 2021
-
@booboo said in All Blacks 2021:
Do they only pick players in one position?
Yes, that's what they've done
Otherwise Jacobson might appear in 3 positions, ALB might be the best 12 & 13 etc etc
With all the versatility the table wouldn't really shows depth anymore. There'd be ~20(?) players on the list multiple times
As an approximation of the selectors rankings it's not bad
-
-
@bovidae said in All Blacks 2021:
I think you could argue with some of the selections in the 4th and 5th XVs, and whether they are in the right order, or should be there at all.
Of course
It'd be impossible to get it perfect. If the selectors made their own charts they wouldn't agree with each other
-
The table should really only show those expected to be capable of playing test rugby either right now or with short in camp development eg QT if he was listed on this at the start of the year.
There are plenty in that table that are far away from being ready.
-
-
They look to have used previous AB selection (irrespective if you played or not) as an indicator, which is fair enough.
So then PUJ should be in the 3rd team in place of Nankivell, and you would have Cameron ahead of Love, as two examples. Personally I would have Harmon ahead of Christie too.
Ross was called into the ABs this year but Hodgman was an AB last year. A toss up.
-
It's an interesting table, but there are a few strange ones (e.g., Nankivell ahead of PUJ and not listed as a 12, where he is significantly better). Similarly, TUJ is a 12 too. Beyond that, Flanders should be there ahead of MMT and Hodgman is completely missing.
Having said that, as @Duluth said, exactly where different players would get placed depends on the selector, so it's to be expected that I won't agree with much of it.
To show how the table serves its purpose, we could probably add another column and in some positions still have quality players who could become international class.
-
@duluth said in All Blacks 2021:
@crucial said in All Blacks 2021:
There are plenty in that table that are far away from being ready.
I agree. Those are the positions that lack depth.
It's an easy way of glancing across the rows and seeing where the problems are
1,2,3 OK but hardly a strong fight.
4,5 weak depth
6 pretty good
7 only strong to 3rd pick if AS is moved there
8 only good by shuffling some 6s in
9 OK if Fakatava is available but quality drops quickly
10 weak
11 weak
12 some options but nothing cemented
13 first choice good, then like 12
14 depth disappears quickly
15 with no DMac very weak although breakout seasons from Sullivan and/or CGB could change that picture. -
listing a bunch of names is not depth!
Some of the guys in the left column aren't playing well, some of the guys in the 2nd column have been proven to not be to standard
that's not depth, that's just people who play the position
this looks like another "NZ rugby players are all amazing, so it can't be their fault results aren't there"
-
-
@duluth said in All Blacks 2021:
@crucial said in All Blacks 2021:
11 weak
14 depth disappears quicklyI can't think of time when the wing depth has been worse
Which is saying a lot when we had Ralph on the wing
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks 2021:
listing a bunch of names is not depth!
Some of the guys in the left column aren't playing well, some of the guys in the 2nd column have been proven to not be to standard
that's not depth, that's just people who play the position
this looks like another "NZ rugby players are all amazing, so it can't be their fault results aren't there"
I'm just disappointed they stopped naming people after five. I wanted to everyone to know that I'm 1847834th in line to be first five-eighth for the All Blacks.
To actually show the relative depth in positions, they should have coloured the cells with the standard of the player.
-
Good analysis I thought. The enlarged squad needed this year for such a tough program has built depth through international test opportunities.
Shows how weak we are depth wise in some spots and how some super teams will be threadbare in areas.
Only quibbles for me were Rayasi T Christie and Love rated that high.
We have a lot of 'not quites' at 6 currently. Hoping someone pushes forward there and that we get others progress at prop 10 and back 3.
Thought Harry Plummer and Selby Rickett deserved inclusion and maybe Sami Finau and Sam Gilbert. But only at 5th choice level. -
There'll be a few surprises that come through, always does.
-
Depth in mediocrity perhaps.
There's only 2-3 people on that list I'd argue are currently amongst the top in the world in their position (and the second one and third one are arguable). -
Odd to see Rayasi ranked as 3rd best right wing. I have never seen him play in that position. Christie included in the best opensides is also weird as he did not play in 2021 and hardly set the world on fire in 2020. Nankivell named as outside centre is also questionable as he is mainly a second five. I don't know how to think about Ruben Love's inclusion in this list too. McClutchie was far better in this year's NPC and I am not from Napier !
-
@kirwan said in All Blacks 2021:
@duluth said in All Blacks 2021:
@crucial said in All Blacks 2021:
11 weak
14 depth disappears quicklyI can't think of time when the wing depth has been worse
Which is saying a lot when we had Ralph on the wing
Stole lots of caps from Rundle, Reihana and James Kerr.
-
@billy-tell said in All Blacks 2021:
It’s funny. Savea is highly rated outside of this forum, whether that’s journalists or rugby fans from our opponents, but here he seems to be regarded as borderline useless. Someone is wrong.
I see world rugby have named him at number 8 in their dream team. Along with Barrett at 10 and Jordan at 14.
