• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Depth at 10

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
83 Posts 37 Posters 3.3k Views
Depth at 10
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to booboo on last edited by Duluth
    #45

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Bergus Furke (for the life of me I can't say it the right way around) was backup 10 for Saders last year.

    Is there any potential there? Did he play NPC (I saw f-all)?

    He struggled a bit. Doubt he'll have much impact on Super Rugby next year

    I suspect the Crusaders 10's will be ranked in this order:
    Richie Mo’unga, David Havili, Simon Hickey, Fergus Burke

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #46

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Bergus Furke (for the life of me I can't say it the right way around) was backup 10 for Saders last year.

    Is there any potential there? Did he play NPC (I saw f-all)?

    He struggled a bit. Doubt he'll have much impact on Super Rugby next year

    I suspect the Crusaders 10's will be ranked in this order:
    Richie Mo’unga, David Havili, Simon Hickey, Fergus Burke

    The fact that the Crusaders have Hickey in their squad tells you everything we need to know about the depth of ten in NZ. (All the best to him, seems like a good guy, but....)

    We are stuck with these two guys and now have a desperate need to develop a third now DMac (basically RM lite) is gone overseas. ABs need to pick a young guy they think has the game for Test rugby (ignore Super Rugby form, it just gives us more players like RM) and get him ready.

    Good luck <insert eye roll emoji>

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Kirwan
    #47

    Oh, and avoid putting massive expectations on him like with Toeava.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #48

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    I like him at fullback. Safe under the high ball, picks when to join the line well & he has a massive boot to punish poor kicks. He looks very comfortable there

    Also I see MacDonald mentioned three other players at 10 today (Barrett, Plummer, Perofeta)
    I think Sullivan will remain the starting fullback and they won't move him

    KirwanK CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #49

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    I like him at fullback. Safe under the high ball, picks when to join the line well & he has a massive boot to punish poor kicks. He looks very comfortable there

    Also I see MacDonald mentioned three other players at 10 today (Barrett, Plummer, Perofeta)
    I think Sullivan will remain the starting fullback and they won't move him

    Yep, he's like a mixture of Carter and Dagg at fullback (not saying he's as good as Carter, just is the player he reminds me of most). Has a huge boot.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #50

    @kirwan said in Depth at 10:

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    I like him at fullback. Safe under the high ball, picks when to join the line well & he has a massive boot to punish poor kicks. He looks very comfortable there

    Also I see MacDonald mentioned three other players at 10 today (Barrett, Plummer, Perofeta)
    I think Sullivan will remain the starting fullback and they won't move him

    Yep, he's like a mixture of Carter and Dagg at fullback (not saying he's as good as Carter, just is the player he reminds me of most). Has a huge boot.

    Didn't hurt Carter to start outside 10, either. Get a chance to see high quality 10 in action, but without the pressure of having to drive the team yourself.

    RM did teh same, and it's benefitted him.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #51

    @mariner4life said in Depth at 10:

    Our pack laid a platform today

    for 30/80 minutes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #52

    @nzzp said in Depth at 10:

    @kirwan said in Depth at 10:

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    I like him at fullback. Safe under the high ball, picks when to join the line well & he has a massive boot to punish poor kicks. He looks very comfortable there

    Also I see MacDonald mentioned three other players at 10 today (Barrett, Plummer, Perofeta)
    I think Sullivan will remain the starting fullback and they won't move him

    Yep, he's like a mixture of Carter and Dagg at fullback (not saying he's as good as Carter, just is the player he reminds me of most). Has a huge boot.

    Didn't hurt Carter to start outside 10, either. Get a chance to see high quality 10 in action, but without the pressure of having to drive the team yourself.

    RM did teh same, and it's benefitted him.

    i use to use that example and talked up Josh Ioane at 12 as a way to get him to the next level....and then we tried it and bit us in the arse

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #53

    @kiwiwomble said in Depth at 10:

    @nzzp said in Depth at 10:

    @kirwan said in Depth at 10:

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    I like him at fullback. Safe under the high ball, picks when to join the line well & he has a massive boot to punish poor kicks. He looks very comfortable there

    Also I see MacDonald mentioned three other players at 10 today (Barrett, Plummer, Perofeta)
    I think Sullivan will remain the starting fullback and they won't move him

    Yep, he's like a mixture of Carter and Dagg at fullback (not saying he's as good as Carter, just is the player he reminds me of most). Has a huge boot.

    Didn't hurt Carter to start outside 10, either. Get a chance to see high quality 10 in action, but without the pressure of having to drive the team yourself.

    RM did teh same, and it's benefitted him.

    i use to use that example and talked up Josh Ioane at 12 as a way to get him to the next level....and then we tried it and bit us in the arse

    yeah. Tough eh, but there is a track record of it succeeding.

    Also, if you can play 12 it's good learning to play defensively at 10. BB used to be an absolute turnstile at the top level; he's really picked up his game in that area. not even talked about any more.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #54

    @nzzp said in Depth at 10:

    @kiwiwomble said in Depth at 10:

    @nzzp said in Depth at 10:

    @kirwan said in Depth at 10:

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    I like him at fullback. Safe under the high ball, picks when to join the line well & he has a massive boot to punish poor kicks. He looks very comfortable there

    Also I see MacDonald mentioned three other players at 10 today (Barrett, Plummer, Perofeta)
    I think Sullivan will remain the starting fullback and they won't move him

    Yep, he's like a mixture of Carter and Dagg at fullback (not saying he's as good as Carter, just is the player he reminds me of most). Has a huge boot.

    Didn't hurt Carter to start outside 10, either. Get a chance to see high quality 10 in action, but without the pressure of having to drive the team yourself.

    RM did teh same, and it's benefitted him.

    i use to use that example and talked up Josh Ioane at 12 as a way to get him to the next level....and then we tried it and bit us in the arse

    yeah. Tough eh, but there is a track record of it succeeding.

    Also, if you can play 12 it's good learning to play defensively at 10. BB used to be an absolute turnstile at the top level; he's really picked up his game in that area. not even talked about any more.

    you're right, i thin it says more about Josh or at least where he was headspace wise last year, its one of the problems with these relatively short super seasons, you just dont have the time to try stuff out, lose 2 or 3 and your on the ropes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #55

    @duluth said in Depth at 10:

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    I like him at fullback. Safe under the high ball, picks when to join the line well & he has a massive boot to punish poor kicks. He looks very comfortable there

    Also I see MacDonald mentioned three other players at 10 today (Barrett, Plummer, Perofeta)
    I think Sullivan will remain the starting fullback and they won't move him

    I agree that they will use him where he fits best in their team but long term I would love to see what he could do at 10. His boot seems not only big (if that was a criteria Stevenson would be a star) but accurate AND he seemingly has that elusive quality of time with the ball to make the right decisions. All attributes needed at 10 and all things that our current 10s don't have.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    Richie Mo'unga would be OK if the AB forwards put him on the front foot. This was not the case against France, with the notable exception of a 20 min period.
    McClutchie was the standout 10 in the NPC. But his size could be a problem at the highest level.

    taniwharugbyT CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #57

    @cgrant but his team gave him a pretty good ride too, we need these guys to be able to do what they need to do on the back foot too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    god you just have to look at the names on the Super Rugby squads at 10 to see just what the issue is.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #59

    @booboo said in Depth at 10:

    Bergus Furke (for the life of me I can't say it the right way around) was backup 10 for Saders last year.

    Is there any potential there? Did he play NPC (I saw f-all)?

    Bit of talk around McClutchie. Anyone who isn't @Stargazer got an opinion on his future?

    Also previous age group hype around Rivez Reihana. What's the story with him?

    Like the idea of Sullivan what little I've seen.

    While I think he's been undeservedly left out of NZ Super teams for a few years now I don't think he's close to AB ceiling. If you want someone from the Bay as AB 10 then Sullivan is the guy.

    On McClutchie, the Crusaders were apparently keen on him but he'd already signed with MP, it would have been interesting to see him surrounded by those top calibre players, instead he's going to have to shoulder a lot of weight in a thrown together new team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bobily2
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #60

    @mariner4life said in Depth at 10:

    god you just have to look at the names on the Super Rugby squads at 10 to see just what the issue is.

    It's pretty sparse. The more talented U20 players often get shoved around to fullback, 12 etc. for half their career. I fully expect this to happen with Zarn Sullivan - it will be decided he isn't enough of an attacking threat to play fullback for the ABs, but he's not experienced enough at 10. And there will be no consistent plan to actually develop him there

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #61

    @cgrant said in Depth at 10:

    Richie Mo'unga would be OK if the AB forwards put him on the front foot. This was not the case against France, with the notable exception of a 20 min period.
    McClutchie was the standout 10 in the NPC. But his size could be a problem at the highest level.

    I don't think we can take that as a given. Opposition with forward based games see to that and their backs have learned skills to keep the ball away from our forwards without kicking it back to us.
    We need a 10 that can manipulate the opposition into providing opportunities even if or forwards aren't dominant because a lot of the time even good forwards will only get parity.
    Picking a 10 based on the work of 9 other players being good is crazy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    If only Grant Fox was involved.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #63

    @antipodean get Beaver in there!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    If we look at the U20s 1st 5s in recent years we have had:

    2021 - Aidan Morgan, Ruben Love, Harry Godfrey
    2020 - Zarn Sullivan, Stu Cruden, Rivez Reihana, Aidan Morgan, Ruben Love (training squad only)
    2019 - Fergus Burke, Rivez Reihana, (Kaleb Trask)

    The majority of these players aren't yet regular starters at SR level or playing at 1st 5 if they are.

    DuluthD KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
    1

Depth at 10
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.