• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Other Cricket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.6k Posts 77 Posters 71.3k Views
Other Cricket
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    wrote on last edited by
    #651

    Postponed 2nd ODI is on now. Oz batting were 45 - 6 at one stage, now 97 - 7 after 27 overs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #652

    Anyone watched the Hundred? The cricket is sort of exciting ‘cos it’s all balls out from the word go but I just can’t watch it. The fucking comms are just level 3 cheerleaders for “the product”, so much so that it makes my blood twist.

    Just ugh.

    boobooB sparkyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #653

    @catogrande I've heard of it but not taken much interest.

    What are the rules?

    KruseK sparkyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #654

    @booboo said in Other Cricket:

    @catogrande I've heard of it but not taken much interest.

    What are the rules?

    Isn't that the ten overs of ten balls?
    But - with different names for everything, so that the tweeter generation can understand it.
    So - 10 ovrz ov 10 bllz?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by sparky
    #655

    @catogrande said in Other Cricket:

    Anyone watched the Hundred? The cricket is sort of exciting ‘cos it’s all balls out from the word go but I just can’t watch it. The fucking comms are just level 3 cheerleaders for “the product”, so much so that it makes my blood twist.

    Just ugh.

    Enjoying it a bit when I had expected to hate it, although I've been muting the "commentary". There have been some decent, entertaining, close games. Despite the jigling around in format, it is still the familiar battle of bat against ball and fielders. A run chase is still a run chase. The shortened format will reward most teams with a set of very tight, disciplined bowlers.

    I don't have a team yet, leaning a bit towards Birmingham Phoenix but that sound like a run down cinema in Selly Oak.

    It's been getting biggish TV ratings, but I suspect that is because there always was a good section of the UK who liked Cricket and wanted it back live on free-to-air TV rather this being a wonderful new format.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to booboo on last edited by sparky
    #656

    @booboo said in Other Cricket:

    @catogrande I've heard of it but not taken much interest.

    What are the rules?

    Each team faces a hundred balls. Hence the name.

    Bowlers can ball five or ten ball spells. Most are five.

    Change of ends every ten balls.

    Bowlers can bowl a maximum of 20 balls.

    First 25 balls are a power play with only two fielders allowed outside 30 metre circle.

    After a catch, the non-striker remains at the bowlers' end.

    No balls worth two runs.

    Each side gets one tactical timeout.

    Apart from that, it is Cricket as normal. Some of the more radical suggested changes such a scrapping LBW or doubling scores for boundaries at the end of an innings, never materialised.


    Three problems from the first round. The games are meant to be done and dusted inside two and half hours, but are taking a bit longer than that. Not obvious what penalties there are for slow bowling. The white card that umpires produce every five balls is just bizarre, has been widely ridiculed and should be ditched. Too much of the TV coverage has basically been propaganda saying how wonderful every aspect of The Hundred is.

    That said, the organisers will be delighted so far. Lots of close games. A lot of media coverage despite it clashing with the start of the Olympics. Very respectable TV audience figures. More kids than normal in attendance, especially at the womens games.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #657

    @sparky so it's 84% of a T20 with some wanky variation on over lengths?

    Whats the fucking point?

    84% of the most objectionable form of the great game?

    SnowyS sparkyS MN5M 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #658

    @dogmeat said in Other Cricket:

    Whats the fucking point?

    They've changed a few words and some numbers so that dim people (sorry, children) understand.
    Base 6 is too complicated for starters. I've said this before but decimalisation of cricket, in a country that still uses statute miles? I mean really? The whole thing is bloody idiotic.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #659

    @snowy surely under Brexit we will go back to calling a cricket pitch a chain in length and the Hundred will be renamed the perch, barleycorn or peck?

    In fact I rather like the idea of the comp being played across the League League.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #660

    They've simplified it by making more synonyms, jargon, and slight rules variations because it was too complicated for youths and minorities coz of the jargon and rules.

    TBH. A franchise cricket T20ish league was going to be a success of sorts, regardless. Just need to be on FTA TV and for the clubs/counties/franchises whatever to be a bit less racist more welcoming to Asians.

    I do like the experimentation with bowling 2 consecutive overs/set/fives (whatever the jargon is) from one end. Could help other cricket forms (in terms of over rates).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by Snowy
    #661

    @dogmeat Yep. I assume the the ball is weighed in a standard number of hobbits?

    The pitch length must also be in measured in short faggots. I believe that would actually be very close to what we use now (22).

    Wonder why they changed the name?

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #662
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by sparky
    #663

    @dogmeat This is an excellent long read from last June on the origins of The Hundred.

    https://wisden.com/stories/county-cricket/the-hundred/the-birth-of-the-hundred-bitterness-bullying-accusations-betrayal-almanack

    Whilst the launch of The Hundred has been a relatively success within England. A flaw in the ECB's thinking is that the new format is never going to usurp T20 as the established brand of shortened Cricket internationally.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #664

    @dogmeat said in Other Cricket:

    @sparky so it's 84% of a T20 with some wanky variation on over lengths?

    Whats the fucking point?

    84% of the most objectionable form of the great game?

    Outstanding GOM post which I agree with word for word

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    wrote on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
    #665

    FYI - there is ball by ball commentary of the Engand v India test series on SENZ, for the insomniacs and night shift workers.

    RapidoR nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Daffy Jaffy on last edited by
    #666

    @daffy-jaffy said in Other Cricket:

    FYI - there is ball by ball commentary of the Engand v India test series on SENZ, for the insomniacs and night shift workers.

    Nice. You know it never even occurred to me anymore to even think was likely and scan the dial.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Daffy Jaffy on last edited by
    #667

    @daffy-jaffy said in Other Cricket:

    FYI - there is ball by ball commentary of the Engand v India test series on SENZ, for the insomniacs and night shift workers.

    it's great - listened to the first half hour the other night. A pleasant surprise. I love cricket on the wireless... feels timeless

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    wrote on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
    #668

    Bangladesh has just beaten Australia 4-1 in a T20 series. In the last game Bangladesh scored 122-8 then bowled Oz out for 62 in 13.4 overs!
    6ada8a43-9bb3-4f6e-b239-3590edc98f52-image.png

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Daffy Jaffy on last edited by
    #669

    @daffy-jaffy they've been dominant all series. But man, it's been hard batting - 6 an over is good going over there. Ball turning heaps I presume - I saw a bit of one last weekend.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #670

    We are touring there next month with an understrength team so best not celebrate Aussie's demise too soon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Other Cricket
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.