• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies vs France 1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiafrance
392 Posts 39 Posters 15.4k Views
Wallabies vs France 1
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #362

    I don't really know what to make of that game, but it was certainly nice to somehow eke out a win in the end.

    When we controlled possession I thought we looked pretty good, but as usual we were let down by a handful of brainsnap errors. Soft dropped balls, terrible kicking, defensive misreads.

    I'll give them a pass for the first game of the season though. We really should have won by 10+ given our dominance of territory, and the amount of clear-cut chances we totally blew.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #363

    @barbarian ruck work still not nearly up to this level. Yes it is game 1, but FFS if you're the nearest 2 guys at EVERY level of rugby one of you cleans and one of you bridges.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #364

    I don't get the "what a gamble" part of that tweet. Lock trying to win lineout ball in the attacking zone after the buzzer has sounded is a gamble? That's his fucking job.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #365

    If Dupont and Dulin were the last two players to touch the ball instead of those muppets, the Wallabies would've rightly lost.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #366

    @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

    antipodeanA NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by antipodean
    #367

    @kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

    What part of that is a gamble? France were hardly going to try going the length of the field.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #368

    Was McDermott allowed to wave his arm like that? Don’t have an issue with it, just didn’t know it was allowed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #369

    @kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

    Ah right, I muddled up the names while watching the vid - I thought the giant lock was McDermott and the halfback had some bogan name like Marshall or Cowan. 😉

    But, I agree with @antipodean that still, what part of it is a gamble?

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Derpus
    #370

    @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

    Can only play what's there.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #371

    @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

    Can only play what's there.

    My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #372

    The initial error from the French was to not go for a much further kick for touch after they got the penalty at the end. Far less pressure trying to close out a game in your opposition half than in your own. Dumb play.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #373

    @akan004 said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    The initial error from the French was to not go for a much further kick to touch after they got the penalty at the end. Far less pressure trying to close out a game in your opposition half than in your own. Dumb play.

    Yep, that was an atrocious kick for touch. Worse than most penalty kicks for touch in League, and that's saying something...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #374

    @antipodean said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

    Can only play what's there.

    My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

    Just nice that another team decided to self-sabotage against us, rather than the flipside which happens far more frequently.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #375

    Typical first game of the season feel to this game. Thought the Wallabies were surprised by the physical nature of the French but also liked the way the Wallabies attempted to chug it up the middle to try and create space out wide (hope Foster was watching). Is this part of Rennie's plan?
    Slipper is my favourite Wob. One of the best props who never takes a step backwards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #376

    @nepia said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.

    Ah right, I muddled up the names while watching the vid - I thought the giant lock was McDermott and the halfback had some bogan name like Marshall or Cowan. 😉

    But, I agree with @antipodean that still, what part of it is a gamble?

    I did too! I thought he said McDermott was 6 foot nine! Maybe he said 5 foot 9 (that would be closer).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to mikey07 on last edited by
    #377

    @mikey07 said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    I went to bed at halftime how did France butcher that winning position.

    i think they really did tire, weren't so good defensively out wide and the collective Wallabies bench did good for once (how often does that happen?)
    Strange game in the end though. The practical, determined, dominant France that started was not the France that ended.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #378

    @barbarian said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @antipodean said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:

    @antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.

    Can only play what's there.

    My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.

    Just nice that another team decided to self-sabotage against us, rather than the flipside which happens far more frequently.

    I think the real positives are the backrow combination looks willing and balanced. And ample evidence that Test rugby really is beyond Banks and Gordon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #379

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #380

    @kiwimurph I don't get the "Main Channel" argument - GEM is serving HD content into basically everywhere and SD if you live in the sticks.

    Maybe because I just watch streaming via Stan 🤷♂

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #381

    @nta I know some Foxtel set ups you can't get Gem directly and you have to watch through app - it's certainly more difficult to watch Gem than 9 - even if only slightly.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Wallabies vs France 1
Rugby Matches
australiafrance
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.