SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs
-
@nepia said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
You have to go past it
That's not correct. The law doesn't say that.
-
@canes4life He has to be at 10. We look awful in the backs.
A very average performance in the first half from us (have been saying that a lot recently). Our defence around the fringes has been non existant and we've been losing contacts even against this 2nd string Chiefs side.
Upset is definitely on here.
-
@steven-harris I really like Choat.
-
-
-
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@nepia said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
You have to go past it
That's not correct. The law doesn't say that.
You can only be off side if the ball goes forward the TMO ruled it went backwards so he is not offside.
-
@tim said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
What turnip field did they pluck that woman from?
Someone should have a quiet word in her ear about slowing down - that she can breathe between sentences.
-
@chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@nepia said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
You have to go past it
That's not correct. The law doesn't say that.
You can only be off side if the ball goes forward the TMO ruled it went backwards so he is not offside.
Wrong. I've already quoted the law.
-
@stargazer said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@tim Are you talking about the Women's World Player of the Year, and the best recent Black Fern by far, Kendra Cocksedge?
Just because you are a good player doesn't make you a good broadcaster/commentator.
-
@kiwimurph Did I say that?
-
@chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@nepia said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
You have to go past it
That's not correct. The law doesn't say that.
You can only be off side if the ball goes forward the TMO ruled it went backwards so he is not offside.
And also hope the Blues have lost their challenge now as they appealed for a knock on and it wrong.
I hate these challenges, along with all these experimental rules. -
-
@chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@nepia said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
You have to go past it
That's not correct. The law doesn't say that.
You can only be off side if the ball goes forward the TMO ruled it went backwards so he is not offside.
Do you have a law reference for that?
-
@kev I tried to get him up to Northland the year Auckland won the Mitre 10 cup , out of loyalty he stayed with Auckland although he thought about it ..spoke to him last Saturday.., he said it’s now definitely an option , got another a year on his contract ..🤔
-
@kiwimurph And I shouldn't have to. I asked a question.
-
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@nepia said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
You have to go past it
That's not correct. The law doesn't say that.
You can only be off side if the ball goes forward the TMO ruled it went backwards so he is not offside.
Wrong. I've already quoted the law.
So you can be offside picking up a ball that went backwards.
Is that an Australian Law -
@chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@antipodean said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@nepia said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
You have to go past it
That's not correct. The law doesn't say that.
You can only be off side if the ball goes forward the TMO ruled it went backwards so he is not offside.
Wrong. I've already quoted the law.
So you can be offside picking up a ball that went backwards.
Is that an Australian LawWorld Rugby https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/law/10
Let me make this perfectly clear - you have to be put onside in that circumstance. Running past an imaginary line where the ball was is not being put onside.
