NH International Rugby
-
@sparky said in NH International Rugby:
BBC are talking about points differential. That is what it's been in the past.
Yeah, weird, your think who won the game would be the best first tie breaker. They all play each other, but point differential it is
If two or more Unions finish the Championship with the same number of Match Points, they will be placed according to the difference between the total points scored and the total points conceded on the fields of play in all Matches.
If any such Unions also have the same points difference, they will be placed according to the number of tries (including penalty tries) scored by each Union in all Matches.
If any such Unions have also scored the same number of tries (including penalty tries), they will be placed equally..
-
@mikethesnow said in NH International Rugby:
@act-crusader said in NH International Rugby:
A lot of cards this round. Was it 3 red cards and 5 yellows across the 3 matches?
Good
Get the shit out of the game
Agreed when it’s malicious. But this game is sanitized past any recognition of me coming home with my back raked red from studs...Let’s all just think back...It was very very different NOT that long ago.... and slow motion replays completely betray the speed these guys play at. How can we ever hope to definitively prove the difference between malice and reaction speed??Sorry for Wales and I thought the ref was good overall. Just such fine margins and such a tough job these days especially...🤷🏻♂️
-
Dunno how act crusader came into that last reply...it’s all mine😂
-
Biggest choke since The Boston Strangler
-
@sparky said in NH International Rugby:
Welsh discipline went to absolute shit in the last 15 minutes. 14 penalties were the killer.
Ollivon immense for France.
I was not expecting that. I was quite prepared for the idea that we might lose because France just outplayed us, but not this way. Discipline has been such a strong point for Wales for a long time, so to see it unravelling was quite a shock.
Hard to take as a fan. Can only imagine the mood in the team right now.
But credit to France, epic game, and they kept on coming and asking the questions.
-
So....just me that's worried what tech the TMOs are being given to watch replays on?
Barnes calls the Rees-Zammit try attempt as grounded against the base of the corner flag, when it appears clear it's grounded on the dead ball line past the flag. I also thought it was clear that France held up the Welsh player for the other call too.
-
-
@bones said in NH International Rugby:
So....just me that's worried what tech the TMOs are being given to watch replays on?
Barnes calls the Rees-Zammit try attempt as grounded against the base of the corner flag, when it appears clear it's grounded on the dead ball line past the flag. I also thought it was clear that France held up the Welsh player for the other call too.
I think with the second one you're referring to, the on field call was try, so they needed conclusive proof that it never touched the ground.
To me it wasn't clear - I couldn't see a grounding, but couldn't be sure it wasn't grounded. So TMO has to stick with on field call either way.
Then again, my tech is pretty low quality and is sometimes prone to a severe welsh bias, so your may be better
-
@bones said in NH International Rugby:
@gibbonrib yeah, however isn't never seeing it grounded, a reason for no try? France hand under it.
Ref called try. TMOhad to see that it clearly wasn’t not probably wasn’t.
Opposite to the one where the ref choked on a probable try and the TMO couldn’t see clear evidence due to legs in the way.
Evened out in the end. -
This post is deleted!
-
@bones said in NH International Rugby:
@crucial again, I thought it was clear. Clearly never saw it on the ground. France held it up.
You seem to misunderstand. Clearly not seeing something is not clearly seeing something.
The TMO has to clearly see that the ball never grazed the grass because the ref called a try.
If the ref calls no try the TMO has to clearly see the ball graze the grass.
You would have had two different decisions depending on what the ref initially called -
@machpants said in NH International Rugby:
Def yellow though, shoulder to chin, but degree of danger low. O'Aki should have gone lower. Same as rucks, just cos you can't roll away doesn't make it not a penalty, don't put yourself there
I agree it was a card under the current framework, but difficult to see what a tackler is supposed to do when an attacking player leads head first basically at horizontal like Billy did - how do you not make contact with the head there (saying nothing about force, though)?