MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II
-
@Machpants said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
@Siam said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
What's the Netherlands reference? Pregame something?
Like the previous welcome to country mentioning the great game of Rugby league coming up, this one had the Argies being called The Netherlands instead.
Oh God 🙄.
-
I thought Laulala, Akira and perhaps Moody in that order? I been a huge critic of Akira, but he stepped up last night, and hope he keeps to that standard. Thought Cane went well again, backs were generally ok without looking that flash. Jordan scored a couple of smart tries where his pace showed, but it bit hard to give him points when he only on a while and had 2 touches even if they were good.
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
Akira, Laulala and S Barrett.
The whole forward pack was bloody good and Jordan obviously superb from the bench.
Yep. Me too. Just couldn't go for Will, due to the forwards breaking it all down for so long before he came on and smashed the points.
-
@booboo said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
- Moody
I did not vote for Moody but he has been consistently good (like Cane) all the series IMO.
-
@Dan54 said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
I thought Laulala, Akira and perhaps Moody in that order? I been a huge critic of Akira, but he stepped up last night, and hope he keeps to that standard. Thought Cane went well again, backs were generally ok without looking that flash. Jordan scored a couple of smart tries where his pace showed, but it bit hard to give him points when he only on a while and had 2 touches even if they were good.
good? good? You must have been some player if that only counts as good.
-
Akira, Laulala and S Barrett. Wanted an extra vote for Moody as well.
-
Akira, Laulala and Whitelock for me.
-
@nostrildamus said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
@Dan54 said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
I thought Laulala, Akira and perhaps Moody in that order? I been a huge critic of Akira, but he stepped up last night, and hope he keeps to that standard. Thought Cane went well again, backs were generally ok without looking that flash. Jordan scored a couple of smart tries where his pace showed, but it bit hard to give him points when he only on a while and had 2 touches even if they were good.
good? good? You must have been some player if that only counts as good.
woah, you're really fanboying on WJ. Good player, but two intercepts and a linebreak doesn't make him Cullen. He's a really good player, but we haven't seen it yet at the top level
-
In my book there is quite a spectrum between good and Cullen. I never said WJ was Cullen.
-
Jordan's linebreak was followed by an awful pass
-
@nzzp said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
@nostrildamus said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
@Dan54 said in MOTM v Netherlands... err... Argentina II:
I thought Laulala, Akira and perhaps Moody in that order? I been a huge critic of Akira, but he stepped up last night, and hope he keeps to that standard. Thought Cane went well again, backs were generally ok without looking that flash. Jordan scored a couple of smart tries where his pace showed, but it bit hard to give him points when he only on a while and had 2 touches even if they were good.
good? good? You must have been some player if that only counts as good.
woah, you're really fanboying on WJ. Good player, but two intercepts and a linebreak doesn't make him Cullen. He's a really good player, but we haven't seen it yet at the top level
Oh I'm really an Akira fanboy (but others here have been doing the work for me!)
