• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

New Zealand v West Indies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
634 Posts 50 Posters 44.9k Views
New Zealand v West Indies
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #114

    Windies in a pretty strong position going into this over and now it’s almost a run a ball for Blackcaps.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #115

    4 free hits that over and we struggled to hit it outside the 30m circle, what’s going on lads?

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by LABCAT
    #116

    Satner can hit well sometimes, but not consistently.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #117

    @Gunner Paul is pretty unorthodox and you can’t blame them for not connecting on some of those

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StagS Offline
    StagS Offline
    Stag Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #118

    Santner taking to much strike. Nesham will have gone cold

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to LABCAT on last edited by
    #119

    @LABCAT said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    Satner can hit well sometimes, but not consistently.

    Even with that 6 he’s not going great in this situation

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #120

    ‘Takes all the pressure out of the chase now’

    Did she not watch us choke 3 times last summer?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    Needham playing for the not out now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #122

    Doesn't want a 50?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #123

    @Damo said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    NZ's target is less than WI scored.

    I am afraid that makes no sense to me.

    If WI knew they were only batting for 16 overs they would have gone harder earlier - not that this necessarily implies more runs. . I would have thought no change would have been about right.

    Possibly because WI got 6 overs in the power play, and the BCs only got 5?

    Dunno, just guessing...?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    Wow!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #125

    Santner was fine. But let’s face it, Paul pretty much lost that game for the Windies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #126

    Oh well done four eyes.....

    Just stick to this format and stay away from the test team and we’ll get on ok.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #127

    Thought Black Caps were toast when they lost both openers.

    Good stuff.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #128

    Well played in the end by Conway, Neesham and Santner.

    Another quick wicket after Rossco’s wicket could have seen us in deep poo.

    Lachie Fergusson easily MOTM.

    We’ll want to improve our bowling discipline, they won’t be happy with the amount of extras given away.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    Aussie game is heating up too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by Bovidae
    #130

    That good ND man (Santner) is such an important player for us in white ball cricket.

    @Canes4life I've never had any problems with Neesham the batsmen, but don't trust Neesham the bowler.

    Bennett is still useless. 😉

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #131

    Great effort from Conway first up, Santner and Neesham are batsmen, not all rounders, Taylor just looks old and that run out was laughable. Not sure how any commentator could say cramp for Phillips when it was so obvious something had happened with his knee. Ouch to kneecap popping out. Excellent bowling by Ferg. Bennett is shit, are we really that hard up for bowlers right now?

    Powell easily best of Windies. I'm unsure how that dude was allowed to finish his over after the second head high beamer let alone a third. He bowled terribly, yet no run punishment from our batsmen.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    Really good win against the odds, after they were 55 after 3 overs.

    How good was Fergusson's bowling. Serious pace, great to see it coming from us for a change.

    Eden Park is a bit of a dog for T20, ironically better suited for tests as the power hitting isn't so influential and wickets are worth more.

    Seifert did well behind teh stumps - pulled in some high deliveries that could easily have disappeared for more.

    Given what we were chasing, I wasn't optimistic. However, Neesh adn Conway looked very very good. I'm particularly imprssed with Conway, I suspect he'll be in all forms of NZ cricket for as long as he wants. Neesh made up for some average bowling with some outstanding batting, too.

    Overall Spark were OK. Quality of the stream pretty good. Funny to see the scorers struggling ... it's harder than it looks! THey'll only get better from here. Comms team went OK I reckon.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to nzzp on last edited by MN5
    #133

    @nzzp said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    Really good win against the odds, after they were 55 after 3 overs.

    How good was Fergusson's bowling. Serious pace, great to see it coming from us for a change.

    Eden Park is a bit of a dog for T20, ironically better suited for tests as the power hitting isn't so influential and wickets are worth more.

    Seifert did well behind teh stumps - pulled in some high deliveries that could easily have disappeared for more.

    Given what we were chasing, I wasn't optimistic. However, Neesh adn Conway looked very very good. I'm particularly imprssed with Conway, I suspect he'll be in all forms of NZ cricket for as long as he wants. Neesh made up for some average bowling with some outstanding batting, too.

    Overall Spark were OK. Quality of the stream pretty good. Funny to see the scorers struggling ... it's harder than it looks! THey'll only get better from here. Comms team went OK I reckon.

    Neeshes batting was as good as his bowling was bad. What a contrast.

    Can only echo the good chat about Conway, let’s see more of him before anointing him as the next KW though

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

New Zealand v West Indies
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.