Wallabies v Argentina
-
@mariner4life said in Wallabies v Argentina:
Fuck you @Bones but what constitutes "foul play" these days is fuuuuucking soft
Huh?
Was interesting to see what happens to Argentina when the ref holds both teams to the same standard in terms of niggle and foul play though. Argies really unable to get a roll on.
Hooper really dislikes Williams eh.
-
Bashed up Hodge played pretty well actually. The Argies are a tough team, never going to be an easy night.
-
@NTA said in Wallabies v Argentina:
@Anonymous he dived over the line. Therefore it isn't placing it. Easy.
If the first contact in touch is the ball, you're technically placing it in touch. But yeah, it's grasping at straws to expect a penalty
-
@Anonymous said in Wallabies v Argentina:
@NTA said in Wallabies v Argentina:
@Anonymous he dived over the line. Therefore it isn't placing it. Easy.
If the first contact in touch is the ball, you're technically placing it in touch. But yeah, it's grasping at straws to expect a penalty
If we are getting technical then I think his arms touched the ground first so what happens after that doesn’t matter.
-
@Anonymous said in Wallabies v Argentina:
If the first contact in touch is the ball, you're technically placing it in touch
I've not seen it refereed like that, tbh. I think unless it is pretty blatant pass into touch or place from a player on the ground, it's straws like you say
-
-
@NTA said in Wallabies v Argentina:
@Anonymous said in Wallabies v Argentina:
If the first contact in touch is the ball, you're technically placing it in touch
I've not seen it refereed like that, tbh. I think unless it is pretty blatant pass into touch or place from a player on the ground, it's straws like you say
To be fair, I'm just waiting for a professional ref to have to call a 8.2.e. (Who is in touch or touch-in-goal, grounds the ball in the opponents’ in-goal provided the player is not holding the ball. ) and get it correct.
-
@Anonymous said in Wallabies v Argentina:
@NTA said in Wallabies v Argentina:
@Anonymous said in Wallabies v Argentina:
If the first contact in touch is the ball, you're technically placing it in touch
I've not seen it refereed like that, tbh. I think unless it is pretty blatant pass into touch or place from a player on the ground, it's straws like you say
To be fair, I'm just waiting for a professional ref to have to call a 8.2.e. (Who is in touch or touch-in-goal, grounds the ball in the opponents’ in-goal provided the player is not holding the ball. ) and get it correct.
Think I saw that once years ago in Super Rugby. The commentators blew up but the ref was right