Players to build the team around?
-
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@Derpus I'd choose Farrell ahead of Pollard - and I'd certainly agree there's a case for him being the best - especially if you're playing a bit of 10 man rugby.
@gt12 I actually can't remember seeing Ntamack - but, he's just a kid. A 21 year old first five who's the best? Maybe..?
Sanchez isn't in the conversation IMO.
He has the same number of test starts as Mounga (14) and is 5 years younger.
-
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@gt12 Yeah - but Richie has probably outplayed him on every other occasion that they've met. He may even have been better on Saturday, but I don't think I can bring myself to check!
I'm not really arguing that Richie is an absolute gun first five, just that no-one else is either - except maybe Beauden and Richie is being preferred to him.
Don't take this the wrong way, as I think you are a good fluffybunny and I like your take on stuff alot, but this sort of post would be an example of why many would say that kiwis are arrogant fluffybunnies.
I think you're being very dismissive of some incredible players.
-
@KiwiMurph I honestly can't comment on Ntamack - except to say that if a 21 year old is the best then I'm definitely right about the pool being shallow.
Dan Carter was just getting his feet wet at 2nd five at that age.
-
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph I honestly can't comment on Ntamack - except to say that if a 21 year old is the best then I'm definitely right about the pool being shallow.
Dan Carter was just getting his feet wet at 2nd five at that age.
I think you are confusing there not being a standout 10 and the pool being shallow.
Those two aren't the same thing.
-
@gt12 Well, I'm not trying to be arrogant - but, that there is a suite of different names being thrown up kind of indicates I might be right.
Take Sexton - he's been great for Ireland and probably had some time at No. 1, but he's 35 years old and on the way out. Last year's RWC QF is pretty indicative of that.
Pollard - well, I reckon he had a better set of forwards in front of him than we had last year - but we won the head to head game in Japan because the AB backs were better.
Farrell - a case can certainly be made, but he was playing 2nd five at RWC.
Beauden is a two time World Rugby Player of the Year, so no-one would have blinked a couple of years ago if we'd said he was the best. He's not been stellar this year.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph I honestly can't comment on Ntamack - except to say that if a 21 year old is the best then I'm definitely right about the pool being shallow.
Dan Carter was just getting his feet wet at 2nd five at that age.
I think you are confusing there not being a standout 10 and the pool being shallow.
Those two aren't the same thing.
I think you need to give me a bit more credit than that!
-
-
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph I honestly can't comment on Ntamack - except to say that if a 21 year old is the best then I'm definitely right about the pool being shallow.
Dan Carter was just getting his feet wet at 2nd five at that age.
I think you are confusing there not being a standout 10 and the pool being shallow.
Those two aren't the same thing.
I think you need to give me a bit more credit than that!
It's hard when you suggest things such as that Mounga might have even been better than Sanchez on Saturday.
-
@mariner4life said in Players to build the team around?:
@nzzp said in Players to build the team around?:
@nostrildamus said in Players to build the team around?:
@Winger said in Players to build the team around?:
NZ haven't great player now. Clarke looked promising but only for one match
We were spoiled in the recent past. Starting with Carter and McCaw. But add in Brodie Allan Retallick and the likes of Nonu and Smith etc. Also Coles at his best. I'm sure they will come but not yet
Aaron Smith is a great player.
Greatest ever 9 for us? I think so looking at the list below:
Rugby Teams, Scores, Stats, News, Fixtures, Results, Tables
ESPN Scrum.com brings you all the latest rugby news and scores from the Rugby World Cup, all 2015 Internationals, Aviva Premiership, European Rugby Champions Cup, RFU Championship, Super Rugby, Six Nations and Top 14.
greatest for us?
i would go a step further and say i have seen very few who were better for ANYONE
A Smith is weirdly underrated in a way, in that he has probably been our best and most important player for about 5 years, and yet still doesn't get the respect he deserves. And it's not like his body of work before that was already top drawer.
Yep, arguably our most important player since 2012 in terms of our preferred style of play. We simply wouldn't have been able to move the ball as widely and quickly as we have during that period without him.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph I honestly can't comment on Ntamack - except to say that if a 21 year old is the best then I'm definitely right about the pool being shallow.
Dan Carter was just getting his feet wet at 2nd five at that age.
I think you are confusing there not being a standout 10 and the pool being shallow.
Those two aren't the same thing.
I think you need to give me a bit more credit than that!
It's hard when you suggest things such as that Mounga might have even been better than Sanchez on Saturday.
That's just another thing that I can't make an informed comment on, because I wasn't watching Sanchez - apart from wondering whether his sometimes nervy goal-kicking might cost them.
-
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph I honestly can't comment on Ntamack - except to say that if a 21 year old is the best then I'm definitely right about the pool being shallow.
Dan Carter was just getting his feet wet at 2nd five at that age.
I think you are confusing there not being a standout 10 and the pool being shallow.
Those two aren't the same thing.
I think you need to give me a bit more credit than that!
It's hard when you suggest things such as that Mounga might have even been better than Sanchez on Saturday.
That's just another thing that I can't make an informed comment on, because I wasn't watching Sanchez - apart from wondering whether his sometimes nervy goal-kicking might cost them.
Well he kicked 7/8 and scored all 25 of Argentina's points and didn't make glaring errors such as kicking it dead when going for touch.
-
@mariner4life said in Players to build the team around?:
@nzzp Joost is my guy
Smith is better than both the Australians IMO, and Murray as well. They all played different game styles though.
As far as "modern" halfbacks go, Joost best all around and then Fourie du Preez, IMO. FDP gets extra marks for playing an expanded role as his team's chief playmaker too.
Of the rest, it's Smith for me - Gregan had good chat, but once his running game disappeared we all realised how laboured his pass could be. Genia never quite maintained his excellent start, despite having all the tools. Murray is a bit like Marshall - a great rugby player first and foremost, but not a technically "pure" halfback (albeit a perfect fit for the team he plays in). None of the Welsh halfbacks (all of whom were very decent rugby players) really held the spot long enough (except for Howley), probably due to there being lots of competition. England, surprisingly, hasn't produced a lot of decent 9s - Ben Youngs (the English TJ) playing 100 tests says a lot.
DuPont looks like he might be able to surpass them all, but he is French so would not be surprised if he becomes highly erratic or falls out with a coach at some point, both of which might impact his final standing in the game.
-
@mariner4life said in Players to build the team around?:
@ACT-Crusader said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@nzzp said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph said in Players to build the team around?:
@nzzp said in Players to build the team around?:
@mariner4life said in Players to build the team around?:
i would go a step further and say i have seen very few who were better for ANYONE
Rugby Teams, Scores, Stats, News, Fixtures, Results, Tables
ESPN Scrum.com brings you all the latest rugby news and scores from the Rugby World Cup, all 2015 Internationals, Aviva Premiership, European Rugby Champions Cup, RFU Championship, Super Rugby, Six Nations and Top 14.
Interesting- Gregan at the top; Genia next. Both outstanding halfbacks.
Hard to compare, though, because of the differnet styles. Arguably Smith enables the AB style - his passing shifts the point of attack so far from the ruck it opens up space. You see it for the Highlanders - so hard to play against.
Aren't those stats just sorted by test matches played?
Yep, as good a place to start as anywhere when discussing the GOAT in a position. Being awesome for part of a game, a game, or even a season or two isn't as influential as dominating a position for a decade or more (McCaw - looking at you).
That's true. On the flipside though dominating selection for a long period of time in your own test team doesn't automatically translate to being world class over that period of time.
Massive fan of Gregan and he was a dominant player but the cupboard beyond him had moths in it. Whitaker probably had 1-2 seasons where he was okay but Henjak and others were simply provincial level.
yep, wasn't his fault he had to keep playing, there was nothing behind him
i have huge respect for Gregan.
Gregan's greatest strength as he aged was his ability to impose his personality on a match. Oftentimes it seemed like he was directing not just how own team, but also the opposition and the referee.
-
@KiwiMurph Ah - I hadn't commented on the thing about kicking it dead for touch, but that's not something that bothers me unduly.
It's annoying when it happens, but it is risk and reward - for every yard extra you have to maul the chances that you don't score increases exponentially (Eddie Jones can probably tell you the value of the exponent). But, people don't much try to drive for a try from 25 metres out.
I saw the suggestions that with the state of the game Richie should have buttoned off and played safe and I thought they were bollocks. We needed to give ourselves the best possible chance to score from the maul and that required that Richie back himself to execute.
That he didn't is annoying and expensive - but, in the same situation I'd want him to back himself again.
-
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@nzzp It's actually a question I've been wondering about, because I've been wondering whether Mo'unga has quietly become the best first five in the world.
Some would have Beauden ahead of him.
Farrell is a better kicker, but probably not a better player.
Ford?
Sexton is probably cooked.
There's no compelling choice for me.
Pollard and then Ntamack.
-
@mariner4life said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
Mo'unga has quietly become the best first five in the world
that simply cannot be true.
Exactly.
How has he become the best in the world? Based on what body of work?
-
@Derpus said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B Faf certainly slowed the ball down and controlled the pace with his Box kicks, but any playmaking that did happen came off Pollard. He also defends well in his own channel and kicks well out of hand and from the T.
Farrell is also better, he's just not as flashy. He's absolutely core to what England do though. In your face rush defence starts with him.
And most importantly, he actually leads his team around the park (something that RM is so far proving quite incapable of doing).
-
@junior said in Players to build the team around?:
@mariner4life said in Players to build the team around?:
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
Mo'unga has quietly become the best first five in the world
that simply cannot be true.
Exactly.
How has he become the best in the world? Based on what body of work?
Well, you're saying Pollard.
Based on what? Winning the RWC?
The Richie-helmed team beat the Pollard-helmed team at the RWC and I'm going to say Pollard had a better pack of forwards in front of him.
But, basically, I think the Bok game plan was centred around Faf not Handre.
-
@Chris-B said in Players to build the team around?:
@KiwiMurph Ah - I hadn't commented on the thing about kicking it dead for touch, but that's not something that bothers me unduly.
It's annoying when it happens, but it is risk and reward - for every yard extra you have to maul the chances that you don't score increases exponentially (Eddie Jones can probably tell you the value of the exponent). But, people don't much try to drive for a try from 25 metres out.
I saw the suggestions that with the state of the game Richie should have buttoned off and played safe and I thought they were bollocks. We needed to give ourselves the best possible chance to score from the maul and that required that Richie back himself to execute.
That he didn't is annoying and expensive - but, in the same situation I'd want him to back himself again.
In theory I agree with you.
However when you look at the specifics of the incident in question - it becomes a bad error.
ABs are down 16-3 basically right on halftime.
From where Richie Mounga kicks it from he actually has a huge angle to work with.
Any Mitre 10 Cup first five would back themselves to get it within 10 metres with that kick.
He actually didn't even get close to making the touch line despite kicking it with his right foot - it missed by a hell of a long way in the end.
