• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

North and South divisions in the NPC?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
50 Posts 19 Posters 1.1k Views
North and South divisions in the NPC?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @Chris-B Travel and accommodation costs will be significant so if NZR can save money there, I am sure they will. That was a big reason the Heartland competition was suspended this year and contributed to NZR's budget savings.

    Based on the 14 teams, the North Zone would be all Blues and Chiefs provinces, and the South Zone would be Hurricanes, Crusaders and Highlanders provinces.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #6

    @Bovidae No doubt - but, I don't think it makes the competition better.

    I think it makes it significantly worse.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    hold on, if there are cross over games then will there really be huge savings? otagos only had three games out of the south island this year, are we only talking about two crossovers so you save ones games worth?

    where would the north south division be? i assume it cant actually be the straight as their would only be four teams in the south

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #8

    @Chris-B I'm not disagreeing with you, just saying NZR will be looking at their bottom line not whether every game is competitive.

    Buses not planes might be their new motto. 🙂

    Chris B.C Number 10N 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #9

    @Bovidae You've got to wonder how big those savings will be if - as Kiwiwomble points out - they're still playing four cross-over games.

    Pretty neglible for the Southern conference teams, I'd guess.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    like it in theory, but not sure how well it will work if it is purely about the $$$.

    Given the geographic layout of our teams, the Southern division would have to be Southland, Otago, Canterbury, Ta$man, Wellington, Manawatu & HB...which again highlights the issues of saving money on travel when the Southern teams would surely be same sort of costs?

    Northern teams, yeah I expect they could save a good wedge with Northland, NH, Auckland, Counties, Waikato, BOP & Naki!

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #11

    @taniwharugby said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    like it in theory, but not sure how well it will work if it is purely about the $$$.

    Given the geographic layout of our teams, the Southern division would have to be Southland, Otago, Canterbury, Ta$man, Wellington, Manawatu & HB ...which again highlights the issues of saving money on travel when the Southern teams would surely be same sort of costs?

    Northern teams, yeah I expect they could save a good wedge with Northland, NH, Auckland, Counties, Waikato, BOP & Naki!

    I thought @Bovidae said South would Highlanders, Crusaders and Hurricanes regions, so not sure where HB and Manawatu fit in 😉

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #12

    @ACT-Crusader said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    @taniwharugby said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    like it in theory, but not sure how well it will work if it is purely about the $$$.

    Given the geographic layout of our teams, the Southern division would have to be Southland, Otago, Canterbury, Ta$man, Wellington, Manawatu & HB ...which again highlights the issues of saving money on travel when the Southern teams would surely be same sort of costs?

    Northern teams, yeah I expect they could save a good wedge with Northland, NH, Auckland, Counties, Waikato, BOP & Naki!

    I thought @Bovidae said South would Highlanders, Crusaders and Hurricanes regions, so not sure where HB and Manawatu fit in 😉

    We'll just play each other ensuring the Shield will stay in Hawkes Bay forever.

    KiwiwombleK Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #13

    i know Canterbury have been a bit rough this year but that wont last...so im not looking forward to playing

    "Always up there" Canterbury
    "Reigning champs" Ta$man
    "Always tough (for us)" Southland

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    I like the current set up. It adds a lot of interest at the bottom of the top group. Like this year. What team will drop down. Also it gives two winners. Wellington will never win the Premiership title (just too incompetently run) but down one level they can win. as they did a few years back

    M StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #15

    @Nepia said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    @ACT-Crusader said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    @taniwharugby said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    like it in theory, but not sure how well it will work if it is purely about the $$$.

    Given the geographic layout of our teams, the Southern division would have to be Southland, Otago, Canterbury, Ta$man, Wellington, Manawatu & HB ...which again highlights the issues of saving money on travel when the Southern teams would surely be same sort of costs?

    Northern teams, yeah I expect they could save a good wedge with Northland, NH, Auckland, Counties, Waikato, BOP & Naki!

    I thought @Bovidae said South would Highlanders, Crusaders and Hurricanes regions, so not sure where HB and Manawatu fit in 😉

    We'll just play each other ensuring the Shield will stay in Hawkes Bay forever.

    So three Divisions now?

    North, South and...what shall we call yours?

    ea91c200-898c-4bcb-acd6-85d9fd2cc9b0-image.png

    Cully knows.... 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • Number 10N Offline
    Number 10N Offline
    Number 10
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #16

    @Bovidae said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    @Chris-B I'm not disagreeing with you, just saying NZR will be looking at their bottom line not whether every game is competitive.

    Buses not planes might be their new motto. 🙂

    For the game in Napier yesterday, Wellington took the bus home straight after the game, as they did not appear at the aftermatch.

    I presume they also took the bus up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mikey07
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #17

    @Winger said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    Wellington will never win the Premiership title (just too incompetently run) but down one level they can win. as they did a few years back

    Took the words right out of my mouth I shudder at the thought of Ta$man and Canterbury....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_M Offline
    mofitzy_
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    IMO this makes sense in more than just dollars and cents. Border rivalries are more intense usually, especially for the smaller provinces. Plus it underlines North v South if that is something they want to push.

    Though there is something to be said about the promotion/relegation battle, especially now that Canterbury are in the relegation zone.🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    This articles touches on most of the points we have discussed. The cross-over games are necessary to ensure all provinces can have Ranfurly Shield challenges, even Ta$man.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/300153812/new-zealand-rugby-considering-major-revamp-of-the-mitre-10-cup

    Number 10N 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    I am against anything that intensifies our season to a series of hard fought derby matches. The volume of injuries seems to be lifting as we move this way especially concussions. The media and the public might want this but do the players? I am all for bigger round robin style comps with a salary cap.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Number 10N Offline
    Number 10N Offline
    Number 10
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by Number 10
    #21

    @Bovidae said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    This articles touches on most of the points we have discussed. The cross-over games are necessary to ensure all provinces can have Ranfurly Shield challenges, even Ta$man.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/300153812/new-zealand-rugby-considering-major-revamp-of-the-mitre-10-cup

    There's no new information or new quotes in that Stuff article.

    Did they just read it on here and pad it out with previously known background info?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #22

    @ARHS Yeah there are definitely pros and cons with this proposed format.

    But if there isn't the money to fund the current 2 division format then better to have a North and South division than no meaningful NPC at all.

    @Number-10 I did wonder that myself. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    The travel factor is compounded by the changes to AirNZ domestic routes. No mention in that article if teams currently do bus/air combos to keep air costs down. eg Manawatu should be on land transport to Welly for flights. Southland should be heading up to Qtown or Dunedin based on the cheapest flight options etc.
    Far flung teams from the wops with little aerodromes (Hawke Bay) can be kicked out 😉

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #24

    @Crucial said in North and South divisions in the NPC?:

    The travel factor is compounded by the changes to AirNZ domestic routes.

    That's what makes the Heartland comp so expensive. Teams have to bus to regional airports and take multiple flights via the main centres to get to their destination.

    In the North division, only Whangarei to New Plymouth would fall outside the 6 hr bus ride limit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

North and South divisions in the NPC?
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.