Blues v Highlanders
-
@trodthesod best game of SRA so far.
-
I’m watching the replay now, and I can’t understand how the landers try was disallowed? It was clearly kicked out of his hands by Ioane but it turns out that’s not what he was carded for (offside apparently)
Why the fuck have video refs if they can’t step up and make the right calls?
It should be another penalty advantage and the try should stand and Ioane should get ten.
Edit: I see it wasn' game changing at least, as they scored pretty much straight away, which is good.
-
@mofitzy_ said in Blues v Highlanders:
The most beautiful pickup of a ball at speed from Beauden Barrett,just class.
Beaudy is just so skillful in the way he can do little things when space is at a premium. Makes things look so easy.
-
@pakman said in Blues v Highlanders:
@mofitzy_ said in Blues v Highlanders:
The most beautiful pickup of a ball at speed from Beauden Barrett,just class.
Beaudy is just so skillful in the way he can do little things when space is at a premium. Makes things look so easy.
BB is some player as I've been saying for some time.
Sam Cane, Sam Whitelock, Aaron Smith and Beauden Barrett. All going to be picked for the ABs (if injury free) for a little while more yet.
-
@gt12 Worked out better for the Highlanders funnily enough haha. Ioane gets binned and they end up scoring closer to the posts.
-
@African-Monkey said in Blues v Highlanders:
@gt12 Worked out better for the Highlanders funnily enough haha. Ioane gets binned and they end up scoring closer to the posts.
100%
If it was a yellow card before scoring, it was a YC after scoring. But you have to be clear and consistent on what gets you a YC
-
-
@Dice said in Blues v Highlanders:
Really impressed with our prop depth - might be as good as I've ever seen it. We now have 6 solid props to work with.
Who knew Renata could scrum so well at loosehead? Small sample, but he's looked real dominate there.
Afeaki has done a really nice job since taking over.
He's brought the Blues scrum a long way since the dark days of Sam Prattley!
-
Now the dust has settled on that great battle last Saturday,and watching a replay of that maul where the Blues held the ball up.,the question I have is this.Given that Sotutu was legal,are the backs coming in from the side ok? If they are not the reaction of Tom Coventry in the box is understandable.Phew!
-
@trodthesod said in Blues v Highlanders:
Now the dust has settled on that great battle last Saturday,and watching a replay of that maul where the Blues held the ball up.,the question I have is this.Given that Sotutu was legal,are the backs coming in from the side ok? If they are not the reaction of Tom Coventry in the box is understandable.Phew!
Nope! Got away with a little there
-
@trodthesod said in Blues v Highlanders:
Now the dust has settled on that great battle last Saturday,and watching a replay of that maul where the Blues held the ball up.,the question I have is this.Given that Sotutu was legal,are the backs coming in from the side ok? If they are not the reaction of Tom Coventry in the box is understandable.Phew!
i didn't think they were legal, looked like Clarke, christie and black all just flew in the side once they saw the ball was being held up.
I've heard people say that once the ball is held up its a free for all, maybe if it was still a tackle but my understanding is he had called Maul and until he blows up the maul they should have come from the back
I'me bias thought so who knows
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Blues v Highlanders:
I've heard people say that once the ball is held up its a free for all
Those people don't know what the fuck they're talking about. There's always an offside line for a maul in the field of play.
OFFSIDE AT A MAUL
Each team has an offside line that runs parallel to the goal line through the maul participants’ hindmost foot that is nearest to that team’s goal line. If that foot is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.
- A player must either join a maul from an onside position or retire behind their offside line immediately. Sanction: Penalty.
JOINING A MAUL
Players joining a maul must:
- Do so from an onside position.
- Bind on to the hindmost player in the maul.
-
Thank you for clearing that up.
The Blues obviously dodged one there.You win some and you lose some! Perhaps the ref had already called held up. -
@antipodean said in Blues v Highlanders:
@Kiwiwomble said in Blues v Highlanders:
I've heard people say that once the ball is held up its a free for all
Those people don't know what the fuck they're talking about. There's always an offside line for a maul in the field of play.
OFFSIDE AT A MAUL
Each team has an offside line that runs parallel to the goal line through the maul participants’ hindmost foot that is nearest to that team’s goal line. If that foot is on or behind the goal line, the offside line for that team is the goal line.
- A player must either join a maul from an onside position or retire behind their offside line immediately. Sanction: Penalty.
JOINING A MAUL
Players joining a maul must:
- Do so from an onside position.
- Bind on to the hindmost player in the maul.
I see that stipulation being ignored a lot in all games, particularly when the backs join an attacking maul
-
@trodthesod said in Blues v Highlanders:
Thank you for clearing that up.
The Blues obviously dodged one there.You win some and you lose some! Perhaps the ref had already called held up.That’s what I’m going with, was up for a while.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Blues v Highlanders:
@trodthesod said in Blues v Highlanders:
Now the dust has settled on that great battle last Saturday,and watching a replay of that maul where the Blues held the ball up.,the question I have is this.Given that Sotutu was legal,are the backs coming in from the side ok? If they are not the reaction of Tom Coventry in the box is understandable.Phew!
i didn't think they were legal, looked like Clarke, christie and black all just flew in the side once they saw the ball was being held up.
I've heard people say that once the ball is held up its a free for all, maybe if it was still a tackle but my understanding is he had called Maul and until he blows up the maul they should have come from the back
I'me bias thought so who knows
Yeah, I'm not sure what the deal is there, because you often see that when a player is held up in general play even if the ref calls "maul".
-
Yeah it’s one of the many inconsistencies you see with reffing of the maul. Similarly you rarely see a penalty for collapsing when the attacking side pulls down the maul to try and free up a “held up” player or the defence collapses that same maul to get the turnover.
-
