Hurricanes vs Sharks
-
@Chris disappointing for the Canes, they actually had them on the ropes..
-
-
-
@Steven-Harris said in Hurricanes vs Sharks:
@Chris disappointing for the Canes, they actually had them on the ropes..
Yeah the set piece move was read very easily by the Sharks
-
Farkin Lomax! That's the third time he's shelled it cold
-
Perhaps they need some farkin glasses out there
-
Ok, he’s just given the Sharks a warning,they get penalised again, and nothing ..?
-
Was that the right call despite it being kicked out of the scrum by two Sharks? You can't be onside unless it's intentional?
-
@Steven-Harris said in Hurricanes vs Sharks:
Ok, he’s just given the Sharks a warning,they get penalised again, and nothing ..?
Not just a warning but he actually said anymore penalties will be a yellow card. What the fuck?
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes vs Sharks:
Was that the right call despite it being kicked out of the scrum by two Sharks? You can't be onside unless it's intentional?
Fifita was not bound though (even though no one mentioned that).
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes vs Sharks:
Was that the right call despite it being kicked out of the scrum by two Sharks? You can't be onside unless it's intentional?
The first kick was a Hurricane
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Hurricanes vs Sharks:
Was that the right call despite it being kicked out of the scrum by two Sharks? You can't be onside unless it's intentional?
General play the Sharks player didn’t intentionally play at the ball so general play, which puts Fifita offside
-
To me another penalty under advantage, so the Canes score, to me it should still be a YC regardless of the try
-
Scrafton has been like melted butter
What's happened to the D on the inside channels -
@Jailbreak7 damage done in the midfield, and the offloads created far too pressure
