• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Cancelled) (Pool B)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksrwcitaly
260 Posts 51 Posters 12.6k Views
RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Cancelled) (Pool B)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #62

    @pukunui said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    I think the selectors have screwed it up a bit to be honest. The way to get Rieko (our best back other than BB for the last 2 years) back up to top form and confidence wasnโ€™t to drop him then play him in midfield from the bench. They also did similar with Ben Smith, dropping him then claiming he had lost his self belief. Which he later said wasnโ€™t true.

    Who knows what level Ioane and Smith would have been at if they had been retained starting for the Bled 2 cake walk.

    I think they would have been average and slow.

    Blaming the selectors for selecting two in-form players, who have played in-form over two players that were given a few tests and didn't really do anything makes no sense to me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    So....if Italy beats us with a bonus point, we are out of the tournament.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #64

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    So....if Italy beats us with a bonus point, we are out of the tournament.

    For Italy to go through they not only need that but also need to allow us to get a losing or 4 try bonus point.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #65

    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    So....if Italy beats us with a bonus point, we are out of the tournament.

    For Italy to go through they not only need that but also need to allow us to get a losing or 4 try bonus point.

    Really?
    Boks on 15
    NZ 14
    Italy 10.

    If we get no points from the game, and they get win + bonus they go to 15.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #66

    @Frank sorry it should read

    โ€œFor Italy to go through they not only need that but also need to avoid us getting a losing or 4 try bonus point.โ€

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #67

    @ACT-Crusader
    Agreed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #68

    I think if everyone ends up on 15 points we would miss out.

    I read the rules as the Jaapies would qualify by having the best points differential and then the tiebreak reverts to who won the game between NZ and Italy.

    For clarification, in the case of a tie between three or more Teams at the end of the pool phase, once the highest ranked Team has been determined following the above criteria, to determine the next higher ranked Team the process would repeat, starting at criterion 1.

    https://www.rugbyworldcup.com/tournament-rules

    TeWaioT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #69

    @Chris-B said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    I think if everyone ends up on 15 points we would miss out.

    I read the rules as the Jaapies would qualify by having the best points differential and then the tiebreak reverts to who won the game between NZ and Italy.

    For clarification, in the case of a tie between three or more Teams at the end of the pool phase, once the highest ranked Team has been determined following the above criteria, to determine the next higher ranked Team the process would repeat, starting at criterion 1.

    https://www.rugbyworldcup.com/tournament-rules

    Who's turn is it to make the boundaries joke?

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #70

    Just what we need, ABs fucking about with real world sports mega stars

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/rugby-world-cup/rwc-2019-japan/116453183/all-blacks-hang-out-with-nba-stars-james-harden-russell-westbrook-in-japan

    Just like before another team we had never lost to

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #71

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    Not getting this bizarre loyalty to Rieko.

    Bridge and Reece have made every post a winner.
    Reece made the decisive break which led to the try in the Bok game which broke the game open and Bridge finished it. Bridge tore it up in the 2nd Bledisloe and both have been on fire for the Saders all year.

    Rieko hasn't done squat.

    He hasn't been allowed to. I think what some are confused about is why Crotty/SBW/Squire are given opportunity after opportunity yet others like Reiko/Smith were just punished.

    Contrast the dozen chances Julian Savea got after 2015 (the year, not his weight in pounds) with Reiko or Smith's dropping.

    ACT CrusaderA KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #72

    @rotated said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    Not getting this bizarre loyalty to Rieko.

    Bridge and Reece have made every post a winner.
    Reece made the decisive break which led to the try in the Bok game which broke the game open and Bridge finished it. Bridge tore it up in the 2nd Bledisloe and both have been on fire for the Saders all year.

    Rieko hasn't done squat.

    He hasn't been allowed to. I think what some are confused about is why Crotty/SBW/Squire are given opportunity after opportunity yet others like Reiko/Smith were just punished

    Contrast the dozen chances Julian Savea got after 2015 (the year, not his weight in pounds) with Reiko or Smith's dropping.

    Is that what weโ€™re calling it these days?

    Theyโ€™re still in the squad and getting game time but like many players before them they have missed selection in some big tests.

    Crotty for some time has been a key player since in the post Nonu-Snakey era. But he hasnโ€™t played every test even when he has been fit. Heโ€™s played most and unsurprising given heโ€™s played well.

    SBWโ€™s form has been up and down but more often than not for the ABs heโ€™s been pretty good. But again heโ€™s missed plenty of tests.

    Squire probably came down to lack of options.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #73

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    Is this game indoors?

    Things I would never have picked at the beginning of this year.

    1. BFA not in test 15, and perhaps not in test 23.
    2. Rieko Ioane on the outer.
    3. Reece and Bridge being our top two wingers.
    4. Ardie Savea playing at blindside.
    5. Jack Goodhue not being first choice 13.
    6. Scott Barrett and Patty T improving.
    7. Owen Franks not going to the World Cup.

    JB starting a world cup test at 10, with TJ on the bench as reserve 10.
    SBW and Crotty not injured yet.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #74

    @rotated said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    Not getting this bizarre loyalty to Rieko.

    Bridge and Reece have made every post a winner.
    Reece made the decisive break which led to the try in the Bok game which broke the game open and Bridge finished it. Bridge tore it up in the 2nd Bledisloe and both have been on fire for the Saders all year.

    Rieko hasn't done squat.

    He hasn't been allowed to. I think what some are confused about is why Crotty/SBW/Squire are given opportunity after opportunity yet others like Reiko/Smith were just punished.

    Contrast the dozen chances Julian Savea got after 2015 (the year, not his weight in pounds) with Reiko or Smith's dropping.

    Perhaps they've learned from their mistake. All those chances Savea got after 2015 certainly didn't pay off.

    I'm as big of a fan of Rieko as there is but his current form is not compelling and his game has completely stalled and hasn't developed at all. His ball security is poor, his high ball work is behind Bridge, his work rate is behind Bridge, his kicking game is behind Bridge. His first instinct is to tuck and run which is fine but he's become rather one dimensional at this point. Reece on the other hand has shown footwork and acceleration far ahead of Rieko in recent times.

    I thought there were some positive signs for Rieko in the second half against Namibia but feels like too little too late at this stage.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Darren on last edited by
    #75

    @Darren said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    Is this game indoors?

    Things I would never have picked at the beginning of this year.

    1. BFA not in test 15, and perhaps not in test 23.
    2. Rieko Ioane on the outer.
    3. Reece and Bridge being our top two wingers.
    4. Ardie Savea playing at blindside.
    5. Jack Goodhue not being first choice 13.
    6. Scott Barrett and Patty T improving.
    7. Owen Franks not going to the World Cup.

    JB starting a world cup test at 10, with TJ on the bench as reserve 10.
    SBW and Crotty not injured yet

    That almost made my Top 5 Stocktake...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #76

    @KiwiMurph yeah, Ioane's stock carry now is a look at the touchline, then a slight cut back in straight into a tackle - if he catches it! I think at least he doesn't lose the ball in the tackle, would be a positive.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #77

    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @rotated said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @Frank said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    Not getting this bizarre loyalty to Rieko.

    Bridge and Reece have made every post a winner.
    Reece made the decisive break which led to the try in the Bok game which broke the game open and Bridge finished it. Bridge tore it up in the 2nd Bledisloe and both have been on fire for the Saders all year.

    Rieko hasn't done squat.

    He hasn't been allowed to. I think what some are confused about is why Crotty/SBW/Squire are given opportunity after opportunity yet others like Reiko/Smith were just punished

    Contrast the dozen chances Julian Savea got after 2015 (the year, not his weight in pounds) with Reiko or Smith's dropping.

    Is that what weโ€™re calling it these days?

    Theyโ€™re still in the squad and getting game time but like many players before them they have missed selection in some big tests.

    Crotty for some time has been a key player since in the post Nonu-Snakey era. But he hasnโ€™t played every test even when he has been fit. Heโ€™s played most and unsurprising given heโ€™s played well.

    SBWโ€™s form has been up and down but more often than not for the ABs heโ€™s been pretty good. But again heโ€™s missed plenty of tests.

    Squire probably came down to lack of options.

    Squire is obviously a unique case but with SBW/Crotty, Ioane and Ben Smith were playing quality test rugby more recently than those two prior to his dropping and Reece's form is nowhere near as irresistible as Laumape's has been.

    The "he has always been good in black" argument is good for Crotty/SBW, but what crap games have Smith and Ioane had? I'd like to see them given a chance to play some shockers before confining them to the dustbin.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #78

    @rotated I think when you're looking at the wing as opposed to midfield it's two vastly different sets of metrics. Wings can easily come in and shine with no experience. Midfield not so much.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #79

    @Crucial said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @No-Quarter said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @Crucial said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    @voodoo said in RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Pool ๐Ÿ˜Ž:

    I've given up trying to pick the teams, but I really hope Rieko gets some time, even if just off the bench. I think he still has something to offer in this tourney, I would not be at all surprised to see him picked and deliver in the knockout stages

    Bridge may have opened the door just a crack after his last performance.

    I don't think Bridge has been nearly as good as people are making out. He's had a pretty good run, especially being involved in games where our forwards bitch slapped the opposition, but he's been far from error free and has butchered a few tries with poor option taking.

    Surprisingly he had game high metres run against Namibia but I donโ€™t recall him being anywhere near as assertive as would be expected against them.
    I guess the coaches will have a better idea from training but if Rieko is showing any signs of exploding back into form then it wouldnโ€™t surprise me if Bridge is swapped out.

    I'd think the TWM would rather have a fully-firing Reiko in the knock-out stages than George Bridge any day, so I'd expect more game time for him against Italy.

    That's no reflection on GB - he's a natural successor to Ben Smith

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    I'm assuming the team naming is at 3:30pm NZT?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by kiwiinmelb
    #81

    I think we can all agree reikos best puts him ahead of bridges best , based on past games,

    Just seems to have lost that attacking ability that made him so dangerous, but have noticed an effort to lift his work rate, maybe that was something he had to work on ?

    The coaches will know more than us , who is in the better mental state etc

    Iโ€™m tipping bridge to continue getting selected over him at this point in time, just havenโ€™t seen enough to make them change it.

    HoorooH StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    0

RWC: All Blacks v Italy (Cancelled) (Pool B)
Rugby Matches
allblacksrwcitaly
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.