RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C)
-
Game ruined
-
-
@MajorRage said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
Game over. First match ruined. How many more?
They are professional athletes.
The shortest player on the pitch is most probably 5' 8"
That's 68 inches of height to tackle.
He chose to target the top 12-18 inches.
Evolove or die.
Correct decision.
-
@No-Quarter said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
Game ruined
Yeah it’s a shame from a spectator point of view
-
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
@MajorRage said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
Game over. First match ruined. How many more?
They are professional athletes.
The shortest player on the pitch is most probably 5' 8"
That's 68 inches of height to tackle.
He chose to target the top 12-18 inches.
Evolove or die.
Correct decision.
Japanese got it right didn't they, get them low, behind the gain line.
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
Imagine paying money to watch that. Ruined the entire game. Stupid system. Dud product. People will stop watching rugby if they’re going to be this precious.
Quite right, targeting the head should be encouraged.
-
Lavanini with a high shot.
Never seen that from him before.
Tool.
-
@MrDenmore Are you serious?
-
@MiketheSnow Really correct decision. Farrell fucking ducked right before impact. Wtf must the tackler do, let him fall over the advantage line
-
@westcoastie said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
@MajorRage said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):
Game over. First match ruined. How many more?
They are professional athletes.
The shortest player on the pitch is most probably 5' 8"
That's 68 inches of height to tackle.
He chose to target the top 12-18 inches.
Evolove or die.
Correct decision.
Japanese got it right didn't they, get them low, behind the gain line.
Uruguayans too. Excellent technique.