• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
96 Posts 29 Posters 3.8k Views
The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #73

    @nzzp said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @mariner4life said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    the Fern is built on hyperbole.

    THAT should be in the banner.

    'we're built on hyperbole'
    'we've got no farking clue'

    It used to be something like that. One of the old heads will remember what the slogan was back in 2007 when I started. Basically that we talk shit and have no idea

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to canefan on last edited by Snowy
    #74

    @canefan said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @nzzp said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @mariner4life said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    the Fern is built on hyperbole.

    THAT should be in the banner.

    'we're built on hyperbole'
    'we've got no farking clue'

    It used to be something like that. One of the old heads will remember what the slogan was back in 2007 when I started. Basically that we talk shit and have no idea

    Inaccurate analysis, poor opinions, no research, etc. est 1999.

    Whatever it was, should be back.

    @Kirwan @Duluth ?I tried to find it the other day to quote.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #75

    @Snowy

    You almost had it

    "Awful analysis, incorrect conclusions, zero insight. Wrong about pretty much everything"

    SnowyS canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #76

    @Duluth Could you put it back?

    It is the most astute comment ever made on here.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Snowy on last edited by Duluth
    #77

    @Snowy said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @Duluth Could you put it back?

    It is the most astute comment ever made on here.

    Yup, it was already on the the list of changes I wanted to make.

    I think it was @Bartman quoting @Kirwan

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #78

    @Duluth said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @Snowy

    You almost had it

    "Awful analysis, incorrect conclusions, zero insight. Wrong about pretty much everything"

    Just as relevant today as it was back then 👍

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    Timeless.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Cantab79C Offline
    Cantab79C Offline
    Cantab79
    wrote on last edited by Cantab79
    #80

    Just a thought, but if both Mo'unga and Barrett were injured the game before a QF, but both were deemed to be likely to be fit for a semi final if we qualified, what would stop the selectors from replacing an outside back for Josh Ioane, so he could play 10 in the QF but the other two would still be eligible for games after that?

    nzzpN canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Cantab79 on last edited by
    #81

    @Cantab79 said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Just a thought, but if both Mo'unga and Barrett were injured the game before a QF, but both were deemed to be likely to be fit for a semi final if we qualified, what would stop the selectors from replacing an outside back for Josh Ioane, so he could play 10 in the QF but the other two would still be eligible for games after that?

    Was trying to find the tournament rules, but bloody world rugby don't make it easy. However, I did stumble across this on team naming, whcih seems to be ignored

    https://www.world.rugby/handbook/regulations/reg-9/reg-9?lang=en

    9.16 Prior to an International Match, the following shall apply:

    (a) Unions shall reduce their Squad size to 26 no later than 96 hours prior to the kick off of an International Match;

    (b) 72 hours before the kick off of an International Match Unions shall announce and exchange a list of the 15 Players who will start the Match and up to 8 replacements/substitutes.

    72 hours = 3 days. For a saturday night kickoff, isn't that Wednesday night (rather than the Thursday something we get). Also, what the hell does Cheika do with his bracketed players if you're limited to 23?

    The Great Team Naming Timing Controversy Of The Fern Rolls On...

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Cantab79 on last edited by
    #82

    @Cantab79 said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Just a thought, but if both Mo'unga and Barrett were injured the game before a QF, but both were deemed to be likely to be fit for a semi final if we qualified, what would stop the selectors from replacing an outside back for Josh Ioane, so he could play 10 in the QF but the other two would still be eligible for games after that?

    I would have thought you can only replace due to injury

    boobooB Cantab79C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #83

    @canefan said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @Cantab79 said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Just a thought, but if both Mo'unga and Barrett were injured the game before a QF, but both were deemed to be likely to be fit for a semi final if we qualified, what would stop the selectors from replacing an outside back for Josh Ioane, so he could play 10 in the QF but the other two would still be eligible for games after that?

    I would have thought you can only replace due to injury

    Prove the injury. Or otherwise.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #84

    @nzzp said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @Cantab79 said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Just a thought, but if both Mo'unga and Barrett were injured the game before a QF, but both were deemed to be likely to be fit for a semi final if we qualified, what would stop the selectors from replacing an outside back for Josh Ioane, so he could play 10 in the QF but the other two would still be eligible for games after that?

    Was trying to find the tournament rules, but bloody world rugby don't make it easy. However, I did stumble across this on team naming, whcih seems to be ignored

    https://www.world.rugby/handbook/regulations/reg-9/reg-9?lang=en

    9.16 Prior to an International Match, the following shall apply:

    (a) Unions shall reduce their Squad size to 26 no later than 96 hours prior to the kick off of an International Match;

    (b) 72 hours before the kick off of an International Match Unions shall announce and exchange a list of the 15 Players who will start the Match and up to 8 replacements/substitutes.

    72 hours = 3 days. For a saturday night kickoff, isn't that Wednesday night (rather than the Thursday something we get). Also, what the hell does Cheika do with his bracketed players if you're limited to 23?

    The Great Team Naming Timing Controversy Of The Fern Rolls On...

    I suspect that webpage just had it's first ever hit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    Not that hard to pick up an injury or employ a dodgy Japanese chef and come down with a debilitating illness

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #86

    @ACT-Crusader said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Not that hard to pick up an injury or employ a dodgy Japanese chef and come down with a debilitating illness

    Just ask Crotty and SBW to walk down a small flight of stairs, 100% chance you’ll need to replace one afterwards. Only worry is it’s likely an 85% chance you’ll need to replace two.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Cantab79C Offline
    Cantab79C Offline
    Cantab79
    replied to canefan on last edited by Cantab79
    #87

    @canefan said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @Cantab79 said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Just a thought, but if both Mo'unga and Barrett were injured the game before a QF, but both were deemed to be likely to be fit for a semi final if we qualified, what would stop the selectors from replacing an outside back for Josh Ioane, so he could play 10 in the QF but the other two would still be eligible for games after that?

    I would have thought you can only replace due to injury

    Injuries don't need to be independently verified though. Moreover, what's stopping a player saying they are having mental health issues or family problems so they can be replaced? As far as I can see the AB's could bring in Josh Ioane in an emergency without necessarily having to replace Mo'unga or BB.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Cantab79 on last edited by
    #88

    @Cantab79 said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @canefan said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    @Cantab79 said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Just a thought, but if both Mo'unga and Barrett were injured the game before a QF, but both were deemed to be likely to be fit for a semi final if we qualified, what would stop the selectors from replacing an outside back for Josh Ioane, so he could play 10 in the QF but the other two would still be eligible for games after that?

    I would have thought you can only replace due to injury

    Injuries don't need to be independently verified though. Moreover, what's stopping a player saying they are having mental health issues or family problems so they can be replaced? As far as I can see the AB's could bring in Josh Ioane in an emergency without necessarily having to replace Mo'unga or BB.

    Agreed. That's why finding those tournament regulations woudl be nice. @Damo can you help?

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Other than hooker and prop you can bring in a replacement player of any position you want.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    Here's a summary of the rules as explained in 2015

    Calling up injury replacements
    Once teams have named their final 31 man squad players can only be replaced for medical or compassionate reasons. Teams must complete the relevant paperwork and send it to World Rugby along with a medical certificate where appropriate. Once signed off the replacement is not allowed to play for 48 hours. The replacement is permanent.

    How many hookers and props does one team need?
    Each team must name a 23 man match day squad. World Rugby Law 3.5 requires each team to name a minimum of six players who are “suitably trained and experienced” to play in the front row. The necessary number of reserve front row players must be included in the 31 man squad to cover last minute injuries to the front row players in the match day squad due to the 48 hour limit on injury replacements from outside the tournament squad.*

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #91

    @ACT-Crusader said in The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission:

    Other than hooker and prop you can bring in a replacement player of any position you want.

    There was discussion about this last time if you remember. Wales went to the tournament with only 2 hookers meaning that injury to either would have to be decided on in time to get a replacement for the game or potentially forfeit the points.
    If either had picked up a card and match ban then another player would have to find an injury and get it cleared then be replaced by a front rower

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    Faking an injury to get Ioane called up would be going down the Warner/Smith route.

    The UK media would have an absolute field day.

    Not going to happen.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

The Mystery of Josh Ioane’s Omission
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.