• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby News

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
5.2k Posts 139 Posters 1.4m Views
Super Rugby News
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #5090

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

    @Stargazer so better he leaves NZ all together than 'mess with the canes plans'' for the future?

    Did he say that?

    Better he just goes to the blues a year early, seeing as he’s planning on doing so anyway.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to SammyC on last edited by
    #5091

    @SammyC not what he said but has said that jordies plans (or lack thereof) affect the canes.

    Sure an extreme way if looking at it, but it is still valid.

    SammyCS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #5092

    @taniwharugby Did you just make that up, because I didn't say that! You said you didn't see downsides. I just summed up what I see as downsides.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #5093

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

    @SammyC not what he said but has said that jordies plans (or lack thereof) affect the canes.

    Sure an extreme way if looking at it, but it is still valid.

    It’s a stupid way of looking at it.

    You asked him for the downsides of the current arrangement and he gave them. You then suggested that the other option is that he goes overseas.

    Surely the more plausible other option is that he just signs for the blues for 3 seasons.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #5094

    @Stargazer

    IMO, one downside is that frachises want to build a team for the future, not just for one season.

    So you are saying it is bad...I am saying worse would be him leaving NZ all together...which was probably not gonna happen anyway given him wanting to play alongside his bros, but if he doesn't get flexibility he wants, maybe he looks off shore.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to SammyC on last edited by taniwharugby
    #5095

    @SammyC I never ASKED anything...I said I didn't see any downside, it was a statement.

    I honestly don't care what NZ side he plays for, I just like keeping our players in NZ.

    SammyCS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by Stargazer
    #5096

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

    @Stargazer

    IMO, one downside is that frachises want to build a team for the future, not just for one season.

    So you are saying it is bad...I am saying worse would be him leaving NZ all together...which was probably not gonna happen anyway given him wanting to play alongside his bros, but if he doesn't get flexibility he wants, maybe he looks off shore.

    Or maybe he would have committed to one franchise for three years (Canes, Blues or another one).

    I summed up some downsides. I didn't say there can't be upsides. You're making assumptions ("So you are saying it is bad") about what I think based on things I haven't said.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #5097

    @taniwharugby said in [Super Rugby News](/post/352283

    I honestly don't care what NZ side he plays for, I just like keeping our players in NZ.

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby News:

    I honestly don't care what NZ side he plays for, I just like keeping our players in NZ.

    Isn’t the whole reason for moving that he wants to play with his brothers?

    How would that happen if he moved overseas? I still don’t see your logic.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #5098

    Nobody forced the Canes to sign Jordie did they? Not sure why people are getting their knickers in a twist over this. Like TR said, I am just happy he hasn't buggered off overseas.

    SammyCS StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #5099

    @Crazy-Horse said in Super Rugby News:

    Nobody forced the Canes to sign Jordie did they?

    When did anyone on here imply that was the case?

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #5100

    @Crazy-Horse I'm sure the Canes rather have Jordie for one more season than that they have to start searching for a replacement straight away (relatively late in the year), but reading the reactions of the Hurricanes CEO in the media, he doesn't seem too happy with this arrangement.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to SammyC on last edited by
    #5101

    @SammyC maybe I am reading it wrong but I get the impression some people are thinking the Canes have somehow been shafted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to SammyC on last edited by
    #5102

    @SammyC um, I did mention that...?

    SammyCS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #5103
    This post is deleted!
    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to SammyC on last edited by taniwharugby
    #5104

    @SammyC where did I say that anyone was forced?

    SammyCS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #5105
    This post is deleted!
    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to SammyC on last edited by
    #5106

    @SammyC haha happens when replying to 2 people you answer one in same post...trying to save the environment by being economical with posting...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #5107

    While this decision obviously pisses me off as a Canes supporter, it makes perfect sense. 2020 will probably be a difficult year for the Canes and will be the first when he's not with his brother. If it all goes to shit then it's understandable he wants to keep his options open. This will be most important phase of his career and he doesn't want to be stuck at a team going nowhere. Alternatively, if the Canes do well in 2020 then he might stay. I don't think it's a given that he'll go somewhere else.

    pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #5108

    Im not sure this is worth continuing to debate because the deal is done and dusted but it is stupid to argue that this deal is any worse than someone signing a one year deal (eg. Crotty who liked one year deals to keep himself on top of his game. Not because he was planning to leave)

    As has been said, if the Canes weren’t happy with the deal or thought he wasn’t going to play with full commitment or it messed with their medium term plans or whatever other reason they didn’t need to offer him anything. Then he could have just gone elsewhere next season as some are suggesting he should.
    But they obviously see the value in having him even if it is for one year. So im not seeing the issue.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #5109

    @pukunui yep, of course something to bear in mind is he could well be unwanted by the Canes after next year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Super Rugby News
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.