TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
-
@Frank said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Donsteppa said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@taniwharugby said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Kirwan no one really deserved to win tbf.
Boy, Fozzie got some work to do if he expects to have a job next year...
He should never even have got this job on his Chiefs form. He’s a teflon coated lock-in for 2020 unfortunately.
If we don't win the World Cup??? Fat fuckin' chance.
That's what I'd have said after his Chiefs efforts too... will be very happy to be wrong though!
-
Reckon they'll keep it tighter in the RWC. I can't see them playing this loose and unstructured. Hope not at least.
I'm willing to give the RM-BB combo another go. This is because we need RM to kick and BB is freaking farking awesome as a fullback. I just hope that first half from RM was an anomaly. He was dreadful.
-
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
No-one was as bad as everyone made out. Mass hysteria!
Some seriously ordinary performances though. Hardly hysteria but I'll watch it again and see if if our captain is still worthy? Maybe the short ass to 8? Definitely Cane at 7. I have no clue at 6?
Hansen's not keen on small backrows - he had that with Richie, Jerry and Rodders - and I'm sure he noticed how much easier his job was when he got Richie, Jerome and Reado.
Definitely a few guys who are just hanging on for RWC, but we had that in 2015 and it worked out OK - we've just got to hope that those guys have three more big games in them.
-
@Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Hansen's not keen on small backrows - he had that with Richie, Jerry and Rodders - and I'm sure he noticed how much easier his job was when he got Richie, Jerome and Reado.
That doesn't explain why he doesn't want to play Savea, Cane, Read though, cause Savea is huge.
-
@kev said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@gt12 agree. And replacements were weak at scrum time.
No they weren't. The replacements were much better, until BBBR went of and they had a floppy fajita behind them.
Franks is a slow poke who's only strength is the scrum. Watch him in a match , he does literally FA. No rucks, sod all tackles, no metres, nothing in the line out. So unless he is dominating the scrum, time to go. And for him it is, he's also a bit of a grub and gives away pointless penalites.
-
@Anonymous said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Hansen's not keen on small backrows - he had that with Richie, Jerry and Rodders - and I'm sure he noticed how much easier his job was when he got Richie, Jerome and Reado.
That doesn't explain why he doesn't want to play Savea, Cane, Read though, cause Savea is huge.
At least a 5-metre giant by now.
-
@Stargazer said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Anonymous said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Hansen's not keen on small backrows - he had that with Richie, Jerry and Rodders - and I'm sure he noticed how much easier his job was when he got Richie, Jerome and Reado.
That doesn't explain why he doesn't want to play Savea, Cane, Read though, cause Savea is huge.
At least a 5-metre giant by now.
He has played like it , this season
-
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Chris-B Who's your 6?
Right now, Frizell - with the possibility that they'll use Scott Barrett there in the big games if Shannon is found wanting (and assuming BBBR is OK).
Unfortunately, we're pretty much stuck with rookies.
-
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@mofitzy_ I'm going to defend Bender. I saw very little wrong today when he is playing out of position.
He is still the world's best fullback, even at 33, maybe not at wing.
He played 14, which in ABs is second FB. He was hesitant and shown up for speed. Being easily burne dout by a loose forward is not a good look. I hope hope hope he is just rusty, but this was his worst game in black ever. He made no significant contribution
-
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@mofitzy_ I'm going to defend Bender. I saw very little wrong today when he is playing out of position.
He is still the world's best fullback, even at 33, maybe not at wing.
He is not playing out of position on the wing. It's where he started his rugby career and he's played an awful lot of games there.
He got ragdolled a couple of times, missed two of four tackle attempts, threw a few bad passes, and has become considerably slower. I still like Bender a lot, and he also adds valuable experience, but he's far from his old self.
-
@Stargazer said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
He is not playing out of position on the wing. It's where he started his rugby career and he's played an awful lot of games there.
Nah. He is an AB fullback to me. He has been shifted to wing when it suits, but he is a full back.
-
@mofitzy_ said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Bender looking every bit of his 33 years, although his experience will be valuable in a world cup.
I remember thinking that Howlett and Mauger were spent forces in 2007 , their experience would have been an asset in the 2007 shambles though.