• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.3k Posts 89 Posters 104.9k Views
TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #902

    @MN5 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    OK we're all wrong, not only was he not shit he was "Magic".

    How fucken deep are Khoders pockets ? is he paying Stuff reporters too ?

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/114557544/all-blacks-v-springboks-sonny-bill-williams-magic-saves-a-horror-show

    I didn't know Crucial wrote for Stuff.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #903

    @pukunui said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Todd and Read pretty forgettable. We really missed Cane and Ardie.

    Oh yes.

    A lot of questions answered I think. I have a nasty 1991 feeling about our selections, but still time to rectify which I hope this was about...

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by Kirwan
    #904

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @MN5 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    OK we're all wrong, not only was he not shit he was "Magic".

    How fucken deep are Khoders pockets ? is he paying Stuff reporters too ?

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/114557544/all-blacks-v-springboks-sonny-bill-williams-magic-saves-a-horror-show

    I didn't know Crucial wrote for Stuff.

    Got on the park. Didn't get injured or sent off. Ergo genius.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • WallyW Offline
    WallyW Offline
    Wally
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #905

    @pukunui

    “Losing BBBR is a big one. Probably one of the two guys i would pick as essential for our RWC chances.
    How long does a dislocated shoulder take to heal?”

    A full dislocated shoulder will rule him out until next year.

    However often the press refer to an AC injury as a “dislocated shoulder “.

    Looking at him as he left the field I suspect it’s the former.

    StargazerS A 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Wally on last edited by
    #906

    @Wally AC??

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    replied to Wally on last edited by
    #907

    @Wally Hansen said it was a dislocated shoulder, not the press.

    WallyW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WallyW Offline
    WallyW Offline
    Wally
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #908

    @akan004

    He’s not a doctor either.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #909

    @Nepia said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    Was SBW as bad as everyone made out? I watched first half on my phone coming back from the State House Rugby on the train but he didn't look as bad as the comments (obviously not saying he was good 😉 ) but will do i full screen rewatch tomorrow..

    No-one was as bad as everyone made out. Mass hysteria! 🙂

    First half a bunch of guys had butter-fingers and killed any chance of momentum. But, many of these guys probably haven't played a game of footy since their teams finished their Super campaigns. Second half, when we started holding onto the ball and develop some cohesion, we were actually pretty good.

    Boks were very physical, but a noticeable drop in intensity after 30 minutes. We should really have banked that game - we were the better team in the second half - but it finished a bit like the game in Dunedin a few years back when that Bok halfback scored a try at the death.

    I just looked at the tie-breaker fine-print in the rules and it says the team whose star lock goes to hospital with a dislocated shoulder is the loser - which seems quite accurate! By far the worst thing about this game.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • ToddyT Online
    ToddyT Online
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #910

    There should've been a count back to determine the winner. Most missed kicks at goal? Most metres ran? Draws suck.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    replied to Wally on last edited by akan004
    #911

    @Wally said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @akan004

    He’s not a doctor either.

    Obviously he's had a word with the team doctor

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #912

    @akan004 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Wally said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @akan004

    He’s not a doctor either.

    Obviously he's had a word with the team doctor

    The team doctor isn't a doctor either, duh!

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #913

    @Anonymous said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @akan004 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Wally said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @akan004

    He’s not a doctor either.

    Obviously he's had a word with the team doctor

    The team doctor isn't a doctor either, duh!

    ☺

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by gt12
    #914

    I'm shocked that there isn't more discussion about how absolutely pants our starting props were. Moody is still miles away and Franks - from what I can see of the stats, did nothing on attack. Nada. Plus of course he did throw in his two customary missed tackles. We are still one of the very few top teams who get almost nothing out of our props - it's a huge strength of Ireland - and we should face up to it. When the Chiefs beat the Crusaders and went deep, it was the running game of our props that helped get go forward. Where is that?

    It's the Franks non performance, and the non discussion about it that is the most puzzling thing to me.

    A K TimT BovidaeB 4 Replies Last reply
    12
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Anonymous
    #915

    @gt12 said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    I'm shocked that there isn't more discussion about how absolutely pants our starting props were. Moody is still miles away and Frnaks - from what I can see of the stats, did nothing on attack. Nada. Plus of course he did throw in his two customary missed tackles. We are still one of the very few top teams who get almost nothing out of our props - it's a huge strength of Ireland - and we should face up to it. When the Chiefs beat the Crusaders and went deep, it was the running game of our props that helped get go forward. Where is that?

    It's the Franks non performance, and the non discussion about it that is the most puzzling thing to me.

    We're all already used to that since he never has.

    Although, I guess there was a distinct lack of his zero metre carries

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #916

    yeah Franks is only there for the scrum, nothing else. But he was wank there today, so he should be gone. with fijita on, our replacement props sturggled, but they were better than the starters until then

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #917

    @Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    No-one was as bad as everyone made out. Mass hysteria!

    Some seriously ordinary performances though. Hardly hysteria but I'll watch it again and see if if our captain is still worthy? Maybe the short ass to 8? Definitely Cane at 7. I have no clue at 6?

    We were f'd in the loose, not convinced on the front row starters, mid field we have the players but don't use them in a combo, ever.

    Hoping that the selectors are thinking like I am (or I can just blame them when don't retain the cup).

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Online
    ToddyT Online
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #918

    Scott Robertson also needs to get his priorities straight. Blackadder always had the Crusader ABs humming by test time. No surprise the All Blacks have looked a bit ropey and not peaking at the right time since Robertson has convinced them to give actually care about super rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DonsteppaD Online
    DonsteppaD Online
    Donsteppa
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #919

    @Frank said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Donsteppa said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @taniwharugby said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):

    @Kirwan no one really deserved to win tbf.

    Boy, Fozzie got some work to do if he expects to have a job next year...

    He should never even have got this job on his Chiefs form. He’s a teflon coated lock-in for 2020 unfortunately.

    If we don't win the World Cup??? Fat fuckin' chance.

    That's what I'd have said after his Chiefs efforts too... will be very happy to be wrong though!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Online
    K Online
    kev
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #920

    @gt12 agree. And replacements were weak at scrum time.

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #921

    Reckon they'll keep it tighter in the RWC. I can't see them playing this loose and unstructured. Hope not at least.

    I'm willing to give the RM-BB combo another go. This is because we need RM to kick and BB is freaking farking awesome as a fullback. I just hope that first half from RM was an anomaly. He was dreadful.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.