TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98)
-
You could put a case for best available 6.
I want to disagree with this but in reality it's up in the air right now. I would have have S Barrett or Hemopo, and possibly Jacobson and Papali'i over Frizzell but Barett is injured (minor injury though - should be ready for the RWC), Hemopo hasn't played enough 6 to determine that and Jacobson and Papali'i are too green.
-
Hansen's cutting it fine though with only 3-4 games before RWC kicks off.
Bad scenario looms if SBW makes it thru this Test and/or Bledisloe 1 and then injures himself in Bledisloe 2.
-
@Victor-Meldrew said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Hansen's cutting it fine though with only 3-4 games before RWC kicks off.
Bad scenario looms if SBW makes it thru this Test and/or Bledisloe 1 and then injures himself in Bledisloe 2.
How bad is it really? We have four other midfielders with a relatively decent amount of experience (especially so if Crotty doesn't break his ankle while walking over to see if SBW is ok).
-
@Nepia said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
How bad is it really? We have four other midfielders with a relatively decent amount of experience
It's the experience in the combination which is missing. IMHO a settled 12/13 where both players don't require a season ticket to the casualty department would be helpful.
(especially so if Crotty doesn't break his ankle while walking over to see if SBW is ok).
Class.
-
Question I am thinking is who does bridge replace in 2nd half? Barrett to 10? What if RM is on fire? Replace best left winger in world? Replace VC and experience in Bender? Or does he not play? Interested to see if it is close what happens.
-
@98blueandgold Fifita? Oh he's on the bench too...
-
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
fresh Boks who are lying in wait for an ambush
How can it be an ambush if we expect it?
-
@Snowy dont forget the fresh Crusaders who are lying in wait for an ambush from the fresh Boks who are doing the same
-
@taniwharugby All very Monty Python - " nobody expects the Spanish inquisition" and yet the religious nutjob torturers used to give three months warning apparently (so that you could shit yourself waiting for them to come).
-
@Snowy said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
fresh Boks who are lying in wait for an ambush
How can it be an ambush if we expect it?
Yeah. And ambushing someone in a friendly match is pretty uncool....
-
@Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
To be honest - I'd be happy enough if they lined all five of them up for a hundred metre sprint and left the guy who comes last at home! I'd be a bit pissed if it was Goodhue, though!
What odds on either SBW or Crotty (or both) breaking down before the finish line?
-
@Snowy Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and rush defence...rush defence and surprise.... Our two weapons are rush defence and surprise...and flukey interceptions.... Our three weapons are rush defence, and surprise, and flukey interceptions...and an almost fanatical devotion to the drop goal.... Our four...no... Amongst our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as rush defence, surprise.... I'll come in again. (Exit and exeunt)
-
@Smuts at least you dont have a pact, I was getting worried!
-
@Bovidae said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Chris-B said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
To be honest - I'd be happy enough if they lined all five of them up for a hundred metre sprint and left the guy who comes last at home! I'd be a bit pissed if it was Goodhue, though!
What odds on either SBW or Crotty (or both) breaking down before the start line?
FIFY
-
@taniwharugby pacts are no laughing matter.
-
@Smuts said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
@Snowy Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and rush defence...rush defence and surprise.... Our two weapons are rush defence and surprise...and flukey interceptions.... Our three weapons are rush defence, and surprise, and flukey interceptions...and an almost fanatical devotion to the drop goal.... Our four...no... Amongst our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as rush defence, surprise.... I'll come in again. (Exit and exeunt)
They greatest surprise will be not knowing any of the Bok players, even after a thousand years of Super rugby.....
-
Very selective eh....
How many times have Scots beaten AUS or NZ in last 20 years?
How many times have Italians beaten AUS NZ ARG in last 20 years?
How many times have French beaten NZ AUS or ARG in last 20 years?
-
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Very selective eh....
How many times have Scots beaten AUS or NZ in last 20 years?
How many times have Italians beaten AUS NZ ARG in last 20 years?
How many times have French beaten NZ AUS or ARG in last 20 years?
As is usual with the claptrap you write none of this is actually relevant to whatever bizarre point you were trying to make. You implied the Scots are easy beats and I called you out on the fact they’ve actually beaten Argentina the last five times they played them.
That’s not being ‘selective’ that’s stating facts.
-
@Jaguares4real said in TRC: The All Blacks against the Springboks (version 98):
Very selective eh....
How many times have Scots beaten AUS or NZ in last 20 years?
How many times have Italians beaten AUS NZ ARG in last 20 years?
How many times have French beaten NZ AUS or ARG in last 20 years?
4 times
Twice
17 times.
Your point?
