• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby News

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
5.2k Posts 139 Posters 1.4m Views
Super Rugby News
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #4582

    @Machpants so it's almost better for us to drop back to 7th and then aim to beat the team in 2nd spot away, so we then get a home semi. What a crock of s#$t.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #4583

    @Canes4life Really we'd still have to beat the Saders in Chch, so it's just in the semi's not finals!

    Canes4lifeC sparkyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Canes4life
    #4584

    @Machpants that isn't the point. Based on our domination of every team other than the Crusaders for the last few seasons, we again miss out on the financial benefits of hosting a semi-final based on some flawed rule around logistical expenses. Plus wouldn't you rather see two teams that deserve to be in the final, actually play in the final. Super Rugby finals is a joke and I'm afraid the reputation of this competition may never recover based on the decisions made by those tw%ts at SANZAAR.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #4585

    @Machpants Unless someone beats the Sanders in Christchurch in the Quarter Final.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #4586

    @sparky still won't change anything. That will mean the Jaguares go into the Semis as top dogs based on the fact they won Q1.

    M sparkyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #4587

    @Canes4life considering the crusaders lost money hosting the finals last year, I'm not so sure! It's not ideal but the conference system is such a fuck up, is moot. Bring on the full round robin

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by Machpants
    #4588

    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby News:

    @sparky still won't change anything. That will mean the Jaguares go into the Semis as top dogs based on the fact they won Q1.

    No it won't, they'd play winner of canes or Highlanders winner in NZ

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by sparky
    #4589

    @Canes4life It would mean that the Canes won't have to beat the Crusaders because the Crusaders would be out of the competition.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by Machpants
    #4590

    Example
    Quarters

    Crusaders vs 8. Jaguares
    Brumbies vs 7. Bulls
    Sharks vs 6. Rebels
    Hurricanes vs 5. Highlanders
    Semis:

    Hurricanes Vs jaguars - winner qf1 Vs qf4 at highest ladders ground
    Brumbies Vs sharks - winner qf2 Vs qf3 at highest ladders ground

    Previous to last year it would've been

    Brumbies Vs jaguars - highest ladder Vs lowest ladder
    Sharks Vs canes - 2nd highest ladders Vs 3rd highest ladder

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Canes4life
    #4591

    @Machpants no they would host the semi-final in Argie wouldn't they?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #4592

    @Canes4life no winner of qf1 plays winner of qf4 at highest ladders home ground

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #4593

    @Machpants right, so the only chance of us hosting a Semi is if the Saders lose?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #4594

    @sparky obviously, won't happen though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #4595

    You can see the reasoning with the jags, in the new system they book tickets for both canes and Highlanders. Previous system they'd have to book tickets to Those placed 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th quarter finalist, cos if they won that's where they could possibly play next

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #4596

    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby News:

    @Machpants right, so the only chance of us hosting a Semi is if the Saders lose?

    Yes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #4597

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby News:

    You can see the reasoning with the jags, in the new system they book tickets for both canes and Highlanders. Previous system they'd have to book tickets to Those placed 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th quarter finalist, cos if they won that's where they could possibly play next

    Yeah they changed that a couple of years back and all the teams agreed because of the logistical ease.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #4598

    The result (who play who in the QF and SF, and where) is the same, but this is the correct format of the finals:

    16bce2a1-2acc-4960-b30b-ec5ec0b4765b-image.png

    Canes4lifeC M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #4599
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #4600

    The question is with the movement overseas is there enough talent in NZ coming through to fill the holes we seem to have not a lot coming through at
    Tight Head Prop
    Tall locks
    No.6s
    First Five behind Barrett, Mounga maybe Ioane
    Looking at the u /20s not a lot there
    M10 is going to be very interesting as a recruiting tool for SR

    DiceD Canes4lifeC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #4601

    @Chris 6 doesn't look too bad with Jacobson and Papali'i looking like real prospects there. Robinson is another one.

    Frizell also looked pretty good when he was starting for the Highlanders, but he's now getting little game time again.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Super Rugby News
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.