• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
823 Posts 48 Posters 66.5k Views
Black Caps v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #712

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    MN5M boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #713

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Don't do it is generally a good rule of thumb in all sports.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #714

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Don't do it is generally a good rule of thumb in all sports.

    Well yeah that's what I thought - Cricket is pretty harsh on dissent too isn't it? Mitchell sticking around on the field and gasping at the ump seemed bad to me.

    MN5M rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #715

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Don't do it is generally a good rule of thumb in all sports.

    Well yeah that's what I thought - Cricket is pretty harsh on dissent too isn't it? Mitchell sticking around on the field and gasping at the ump seemed bad to me.

    Yep. He could be in danger of losing some of his match fee.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #716

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Different issue.

    He was given out by the process and had to go.

    I expect him and Kane to be fined.

    But those unethical Indian fluffybunnies knew he wasn't out.

    If they had any thread of decency they would have called him back.

    What got me was Sharma obviously said something to Mitchell, who then said "tell the umpires". Gutless prick bailed and then Dhoni pulled him away.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #717

    @booboo said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Different issue.

    He was given out by the process and had to go.

    I expect him and Kane to be fined.

    But those unethical Indian fluffybunnies knew he wasn't out.

    If they had any thread of decency they would have called him back.

    What got me was Sharma obviously said something to Mitchell, who then said "tell the umpires". Gutless prick bailed and then Dhoni pulled him away.

    What the? How did you see/hear all this? I certainly couldn't on my coverage.

    It strikes me as a bit disingenuous to moan about the ethics of the Indian team when you don't know who knew/heard/saw/said what and Mitchell won't even leave the field when he's been given out.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #718

    @booboo said in Black Caps v India:

    I'm having a retrospective whinge about the Daryl Mitchell LBW decision.

    I turned tele on milliseconds after he was given out on field, and he had said to Kane that he hit and asked if he should refer.

    Cool.

    Very first replay it was sooooo obvious he hit it I thought "oh good, not out".

    Then I hear hear dufus in the box saying " no bat".

    Say the fuck what? You fucking idiot.

    Then the rock and roll in very slomo was indecisive, but if they replayed the full replay he'd have seen the nick.

    Second, hot spot confirmed on both the bat and the ball.

    I will admit that there may have been a hotspot on the bat prior to the ball passing, possibly from brushing the pad . However hotspot was pretty definitive on both bat and ball from both sides.

    Sure snicko showed nothing. But the case for snicko being any sort of evidence is negated by Nigel "it could have come from anywhere, but I'm a complete moron" Llllllong.

    Upshot is the DRS failed miserably due to human error. Mitchell and NZ was fucked over by incompetence.

    Which brings me to my point.

    It was pretty obvious everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY, on the field knew Mitchell was not out.

    And it certainly appeared that Sharma said as much to Mitchell who then asked Sharma to speak to the umpires, which he started to do. At which point Dhoni intervened and seemed to persuade him not to.

    At this point I have lost any potential respect for Sharma who if he had any, ANY, integrity whatsoever he'd have called Mitchell back because he knew he was not out, but obviously has no mana or authority given he could be so overidden by his granddad MS.

    And as for Dhoni? Despite his demi-god status in India is obviously an unethical underhanded selfish twunt. Hope you make the final of the world cup and get given out to a shocker with 2 runs left on the last ball with no reviews left.

    I wish there were more guys playing like Adam Gilchrist.

    Possibly my all time favourite Aussie cricketer overall, fucken legend and I do remember admiring his stance on walking. Some fucken good humour in this vid too.

    What Australian Cricket did to deserve going from him to Brad Haddin is anyone's guess.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #719

    Drunken match report: the beer and food was great, and fucking awesome atmosphere watching India play at home, the crowd was mental.

    Umpire fucked the DRS decision. Snicko is not accurate enough - that only didn't show up because of a missing frame. Hotspot was obvious, as was the live replay. Idiot.

    CdG and Rosco got us back in the game, and then back out of it in the final 5 overs when they couldn't find the boundary. Amazing death bowling so credit to India, that was the winning of the game right there.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #720

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Don't do it is generally a good rule of thumb in all sports.

    Well yeah that's what I thought - Cricket is pretty harsh on dissent too isn't it? Mitchell sticking around on the field and gasping at the ump seemed bad to me.

    It looked bad, but put in their situation with no idea what was happening outside of what they saw on the big screen I think the initial response was pretty reasonable. Once the umpires started conferring he is well within his rights to hang around IMO.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #721

    @No-Quarter said in Black Caps v India:

    Drunken match report: the beer and food was great, and fucking awesome atmosphere watching India play at home, the crowd was mental.

    Umpire fucked the DRS decision. Snicko is not accurate enough - that only didn't show up because of a missing frame. Hotspot was obvious, as was the live replay. Idiot.

    CdG and Rosco got us back in the game, and then back out of it in the final 5 overs when they couldn't find the boundary. Amazing death bowling so credit to India, that was the winning of the game right there.

    That's my match report right there.

    On the DRS issue -- the Indians saw the hot spot and took up playing positions assuming it was not out. They knew it was not out - but personally I've no issue with not recalilng him. Pro sports people are ruthless ... remember we ran out Murali a few years ago when he wandered down the pitch to congratulate his partner.

    Really good night out, great crowd both ways - Indians outnumbered, but very vocal

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Bones on last edited by booboo
    #722

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo said in Black Caps v India:

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo how do you know it was obvious to everybody on the field? What's the protocol around disobeying the umpire?

    Different issue.

    He was given out by the process and had to go.

    I expect him and Kane to be fined.

    But those unethical Indian fluffybunnies knew he wasn't out.

    If they had any thread of decency they would have called him back.

    What got me was Sharma obviously said something to Mitchell, who then said "tell the umpires". Gutless prick bailed and then Dhoni pulled him away.

    What the? How did you see/hear all this? I certainly couldn't on my coverage.

    It strikes me as a bit disingenuous to moan about the ethics of the Indian team when you don't know who knew/heard/saw/said what and Mitchell won't even leave the field when he's been given out.

    It was pretty obvious that after Sharma and Mitchell shared a word together Mitchell gestured toward the umpires, Sharma moved in that direction, then Dhoni intervened.

    Sure 2 plus 2 may not equal 5 ... and we all know the effect of bias on perception, but 2 plus 2 is most of 5 (that made sense in my head ...).

    As for Mitchell, he was being supported by his Captain who was also protesting. I suspect he'll be fined, but it really was a miscarriage of justice.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #723

    @booboo so Sharma tells Mitchell he's out and should leave the pitch, Mitchell says let's let the umpires decide. Thanks for explaining.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #724

    https://stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/110474758/colin-munros-world-cup-spot-in-jeopardy-after-missing-cut-against-bangladesh

    Seems like Colin will be given limited chances to pad his stats and his CWC chances vs the bangles

    SneakdefreakS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #725

    I don't think India should have recalled him - they couldn't know why the 3rd umpire had decided he was out. And I'm not sure what the umpires were conferring about - unless they were also talking to the 3rd umpire to clarify his decision.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #726

    @Bones said in Black Caps v India:

    @booboo so Sharma tells Mitchell he's out and should leave the pitch, Mitchell says let's let the umpires decide. Thanks for explaining.

    So he was showing respect for the umpires? 🙂

    I still prefer my version.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by Cyclops
    #727

    Third umprie was Shaun Haig who played a reasonable number of seasons batting in the top order for Otago so I'm extra curious about the rationale he worked through, since as a batsman he'd be aware of how much more a poor decision given hurts than a poor not given decision.

    SmudgeS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmudgeS Do not disturb
    SmudgeS Do not disturb
    Smudge
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #728

    @Cyclops said in Black Caps v India:

    Third umprie was Shaun Haig who played a reasonable number of seasons batting in the top order for Otago so I'm extra curious about the rationale he worked through, since as a batsman he'd be aware of how much more a poor decision given hurts than a poor not given decision.

    Completely useless Fern link to fame - I played against Haig in his first senior game in Dunedin - he was only 15-16 or so and was appearing for Taieri having only played for The Taieri High School prior to that (which was not a cricketing school at all). I was a wise old 17-year-old at the time.

    It's fair to say he went a bit further than I did...

    BonesB MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Smudge on last edited by Bones
    #729

    @Smudge kudos to him for making it out of Taieri. That's a whole other world.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Smudge on last edited by
    #730

    @Smudge said in Black Caps v India:

    @Cyclops said in Black Caps v India:

    Third umprie was Shaun Haig who played a reasonable number of seasons batting in the top order for Otago so I'm extra curious about the rationale he worked through, since as a batsman he'd be aware of how much more a poor decision given hurts than a poor not given decision.

    Completely useless Fern link to fame - I played against Haig in his first senior game in Dunedin - he was only 15-16 or so and was appearing for Taieri having only played for The Taieri High School prior to that (which was not a cricketing school at all). I was a wise old 17-year-old at the time.

    It's fair to say he went a bit further than I did...

    When you have breakfast with Jerome Kaino, Liam Squire, Joe Moody and Damian McKenzie let us know. Otherwise keep your anecdotes to yourself.

    SmudgeS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #731

    @canefan said in Black Caps v India:

    https://stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/110474758/colin-munros-world-cup-spot-in-jeopardy-after-missing-cut-against-bangladesh

    Seems like Colin will be given limited chances to pad his stats and his CWC chances vs the bangles

    So it seems the players locked in for the CWC are:

    1. Kane Williamson
    2. Todd Astle
    3. Trent Boult
    4. Colin de Grandhomme
    5. Lockie Ferguson
    6. Martin Guptill
    7. Matt Henry
    8. Tom Latham
    9. Jimmy Neesham
    10. Henry Nicholls
    11. Ross Taylor
    12. Mitchell Santner
    13. Tim Southee

    Means two spots left and you have to think Sodhi will be one of the two. So Colin Munro, Tim Seifert, Will Young and possibly Corey Anderson to fight it out for the last spot.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.