• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
823 Posts 48 Posters 66.5k Views
Black Caps v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #223

    @Mokey I think both are a liability. Neesh has to be the number one all rounder now (as long as he is fit).

    Now we need to find a new opener or move Latham back to opening and find another keeper who can average 30 batting at 7.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #224

    That was an outrageous shot from Boult.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #225

    Nine batsmen made it to double figures, but only one score of note.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #226

    @No-Quarter said in Black Caps v India:

    @Damo said in Black Caps v India:

    Bracewell is the key now.

    So long as the remaining batsmen can support him we're still a chance.

    We are reliant on Guppy, Kane and Rosco going big against quality opposition. They've all failed two games in a row now.

    That's been the fundamental problem. Kane and Rossco got themselves out to a certain extent today - well, Rossco was a bit sloppy.

    Guptill looked almost like he was trying to get himself out - woefully out of form.

    Those three guys in particular have not done themselves close to justice, so far.

    @Mokey is right about trying to play both de Grandhomme and Munro. They're both sort of "gambit" batsmen. Sloggers who will come off occasionally and virtually win the game with strike rate - but, they'll both fail (together) more often than not.

    It's pretty questionable whether either should be in ODI eleven and Neesham and Bracewell look to me to be pushing CdG out - possibly out of the WC squad.

    BUT, I'd be somewhat inclined to send Guptill away to get an innings in domestic cricket for the next game and open with Latham and Munro.

    westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #227

    @Chris-B
    I think Rosco was more unlucky than sloppy. Guptill will come right as he always does, Munro has got to go though, his job is to get 40 off 30 and he can't he even do that successfully.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to LABCAT on last edited by
    #228

    @LABCAT Except Rossco missed that ball by a mile, so you've got to keep your foot down.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #229

    Bracewell is doing himself all sorts of favours by scoring consistently. Good on him for being an actual all rounder. I'm a lot more comfy with Latham behind the stumps rather than Seifert, he got shown up as not ready for the big time just yet. if they are going to keep rotating the strike bowlers, I hope Scott K gets another go. Ferguson has good pace, but he needs tidy up his line. A LOT. And should not be bowled at the death until he has sorted this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #230

    @Chris-B coming out of the Sri Lanka series, wasn't everyone "in-form"?
    after two games, we're out of form?
    we're getting exposed.

    Bowlers...at the moment only Fergusson and Boult should be locked in. We need wicket takers. The way ODIs have gone, wickets keep run rates down. Dibbly dobblies don't cut it.
    So Southee is out, CDG = no threat
    What ever happened to Mitch McClenaghan? he was a wicket taking monster for a season there.
    I'm glad we picked Sodhi, he feels like a wicket-taker - at least he wasn't expensive in the scheme of things.
    Bracewell I'd consider as a bowler who can bat, but then thats Neesham also.
    Santner is the same, doesn't ever seem like he'll take wickets.
    I wish we'd given Ajaz a go.
    Could Milne come back in?

    Batting? Guptill, Williamson, Taylor & Latham would be locked in. Maybe Nicholls too. Right now I'd try Devcich once more, at least he can bowl too. And spin in England is apparently important.
    Munro needs to score some Biiiiiiiiig 50's from here on to convince me.

    But geez hats off to India, they're looking strong eh?

    H Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #231

    @westcoastie said in Black Caps v India:

    @Chris-B coming out of the Sri Lanka series, wasn't everyone "in-form"?
    after two games, we're out of form?
    we're getting exposed.

    Bowlers...at the moment only Fergusson and Boult should be locked in. We need wicket takers. The way ODIs have gone, wickets keep run rates down. Dibbly dobblies don't cut it.
    So Southee is out, CDG = no threat
    What ever happened to Mitch McClenaghan? he was a wicket taking monster for a season there.
    I'm glad we picked Sodhi, he feels like a wicket-taker - at least he wasn't expensive in the scheme of things.
    Bracewell I'd consider as a bowler who can bat, but then thats Neesham also.
    Santner is the same, doesn't ever seem like he'll take wickets.
    I wish we'd given Ajaz a go.
    Could Milne come back in?

    Batting? Guptill, Williamson, Taylor & Latham would be locked in. Maybe Nicholls too. Right now I'd try Devcich once more, at least he can bowl too. And spin in England is apparently important.
    Munro needs to score some Biiiiiiiiig 50's from here on to convince me.

    But geez hats off to India, they're looking strong eh?

    McClenaghan basically turned his back on NZ to trundle around T20 comps. I think he was getting to be out of favour anyway. Don't think he would have made a difference today.

    westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #232

    @hydro11 nah probably not, but he seems to have disappeared from the scene completely. Cricinfo said he has an average in the mid-20s for bowling. We need that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #233

    [cut] Surely we’re keeping our powder dry for the World Cup later this year [/paste]

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    wrote on last edited by Sneakdefreak
    #234

    That's the series over, now it's about testing combinations and fringe players for the CWC.

    Like to see a Guptill/Latham opening pair for the next 2 games (see if Tommy can handle wicketkeeping and opening) and Guptill/Nicholls for the last one. Give Munro a chance in the lower order as well at 6/7 where he's better suited.

    Bracewell appears to have taken the bowling allrounder spot from CdG in the squad.

    Is George Worker injured? If not he should be given a chance, as should Scott K.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #235

    @westcoastie said in Black Caps v India:

    @Chris-B coming out of the Sri Lanka series, wasn't everyone "in-form"?
    after two games, we're out of form?
    we're getting exposed.

    Guptill is the only one who is not in form - he should have been after that 138, but he followed up with 13, 2 and 1 vs Sri Lanka. In his two brief innings vs India he could have been out seven or eight times.

    To be honest, I'm not that worried about most of the batsmen - Kane, Rossco, Latham, Nicholls - they can all bat and on another day might collectively have made enough runs to win that game - especially if they'd got decent help from the top order. Munro is what he is - Guptill is the one who concerns me for this series.

    The bowling is of much greater concern - Boult is our only genuinely good bowler and even he is not particularly good at the death by international standards. Ferguson is improving and developing variations, but he's not accurate enough and I suspect likely to become pretty wild if he gets taken to. Southee, Henry, Bracewell all pretty hittable. CdG is cannon-fodder unless it is nipping about.

    I think we'll do better if the pitches in England suit playing two spinners, though pretty clearly Ish and Santner aren't in the same class as the frontline Indian spinners.

    Don't think this team is as strong as our 2015 CWC team, with BMac, Vettori, Elliott, Milne and even the lower order threat of Ronchi.

    westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #236

    @Chris-B fingers x'd we get Milne back I'd say - extra pace does help.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #237

    I thought Milne has slowed down to mid to late thirties in an attempt to beat the injuries?

    Milne is one of those players that get better the less he plays. Can't believe the number of people talking him up for the squad based on what? Playing one game every two seasons?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #238

    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v India:

    I thought Milne has slowed down to mid to late thirties in an attempt to beat the injuries?

    Milne is one of those players that get better the less he plays. Can't believe the number of people talking him up for the squad based on what? Playing one game every two seasons?

    Crickets Charlie Ngatai?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    newsjunkie
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #239

    @Gunner So Thompson can be roundarm, at pace. And its not a problem. So can Malinga.

    But a spinner does it, and suddenly somehow its not kosher.

    westcoastieW G 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to newsjunkie on last edited by
    #240

    @newsjunkie I didn;t think Malinga was kosher, and don't think Yadav is. A simple rule like the ball must be released above the head would help. How low does the release point have to be before its at odds with the spirit of bowling?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #241

    @westcoastie said in Black Caps v India:

    oh thats completely bullshit
    lights going off aren't out. his toe would've been down. and what the fuck happened to benefit of the doubt not a single person in the world can 100% say thats out

    Yep. Just because in the first frame when he absolutely does have his toe squished into the turf the lights were on, doesn't 100% mean thta in the previous frame when the lights were on that his toe wasn't touching the turf. There's no way anyone can definitively see a gap in between.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #242

    If Anderson can't be relied upon to bowl then try him at the top of the innings. He certainly offers the explosiveness the selectors seem to want. Then who knows, he may even be able to trundle in for five overs at the World Cup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.