Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad
-
@Hooroo said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
I think Nicholls, Sohdi and Neesham are a lock and Santner is a likely.
I also think you need to make room for Bennett too (Was he the one with squad for this series but didn't get a match? I may be getting my names mixed up)
Nah that was Bracewell. I think they selected him in the ODI squad for SL thining that he and Neesham would both get their chance to interview for a spot in addition to de Grandhomme, but Neesham shot the lights out in his first crack and that issue was resolved so Bracewell couldn't even get a look in the dead rubber third ODI.
-
@shark said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
@Hooroo said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
I think Nicholls, Sohdi and Neesham are a lock and Santner is a likely.
I also think you need to make room for Bennett too (Was he the one with squad for this series but didn't get a match? I may be getting my names mixed up)
Nah that was Bracewell. I think they selected him in the ODI squad for SL thining that he and Neesham would both get their chance to interview for a spot in addition to de Grandhomme, but Neesham shot the lights out in his first crack and that issue was resolved so Bracewell couldn't even get a look in the dead rubber third ODI.
That's the one! Bracewell.
Is 15 the standard squad number?
-
-
@MN5 said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
In what universe is Neesham not a dead set certainty?
He shoulda been at the last cup although obviously Elliot did brilliantly well.
He's only played three games after a long absence and was never an ODI incumbent before. Let's see how he goes VS India as they're a sterner test, but he's a likely starter.
-
This is not directed at you shark as much as the selectors, but with a major injury to one of our middle order how can we replace them from within the squad without having a tail that starts at 5?
Last CWC we took two spinners (Hart and Vettori) who played a total of one game against Scotland. The game has changed in 20 years though and many spinners have adapted to be economical innings eaters in all conditions with the whiteball - but I wouldn't place Sodhi or Santner in that category. I think you take one of those maximum.
Always liked Bracewell and without too much Plunket Shield on the telly his statistics this season have been pretty strong. Another ex-BC who keeps jumping out from scorecards this summer, including the India A series, is Hamish Rutherford - although he doesn't seem to be in the picture.
Personal preference would be drop de Grandhomme and probably Santner (alternatively Ish) for Braces and another the best out and out top order batsman in the country currently not in the squad.
-
-
@rotated said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
This is not directed at you shark as much as the selectors, but with a major injury to one of our middle order how can we replace them from within the squad without having a tail that starts at 5?
Last CWC we took two spinners (Hart and Vettori) who played a total of one game against Scotland. The game has changed in 20 years though and many spinners have adapted to be economical innings eaters in all conditions with the whiteball - but I wouldn't place Sodhi or Santner in that category. I think you take one of those maximum.
Always liked Bracewell and without too much Plunket Shield on the telly his statistics this season have been pretty strong. Another ex-BC who keeps jumping out from scorecards this summer, including the India A series, is Hamish Rutherford - although he doesn't seem to be in the picture.
Personal preference would be drop de Grandhomme and probably Santner (alternatively Ish) for Braces and another the best out and out top order batsman in the country currently not in the squad.
Quite a few relatively oddball suggestions there. There's no real reason to look further at Bracewell or at Rutherford, in the context of the current squad and returning players. As for not taking two spinners, you may have a case but I'd take two.
Re covering for a middle order injury, that's easy in this squad. You have five batsmen anyway as three are six in my squad and they can be juggled due to the flexibility provided by Latham and Munro, then there are 2-3 all rounders (if you include Santner as one) and a batting back up 'keeper in Seifert.
-
@rotated said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
Hypothetical - after having been passed over at the IPL auction Baz declares himself available for CWC if needed. Would he make your squad, if not how close would he get for you?
If he showed some form for the Heat (one score after a run of shit scores doesn't count as form), I'd consider him as a replacemtn for Munro.
-
@rotated said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
Hypothetical - after having been passed over at the IPL auction Baz declares himself available for CWC if needed. Would he make your squad, if not how close would he get for you?
Not sure he would get close anymore - he's a very known quantity by opposition bowlers all around the world, personally I think his reaction time and batspeed has diminished significantly - and the CWC is in England, meaning Dukes balls which means technical aptitude is far more important in an ODI context than elsewhere. Sure he might bring off one good innings in 5, but that's not good enough at the CWC.
-
@SynicBast said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
@rotated said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
Hypothetical - after having been passed over at the IPL auction Baz declares himself available for CWC if needed. Would he make your squad, if not how close would he get for you?
Not sure he would get close anymore - he's a very known quantity by opposition bowlers all around the world, personally I think his reaction time and batspeed has diminished significantly - and the CWC is in England, meaning Dukes balls which means technical aptitude is far more important in an ODI context than elsewhere. Sure he might bring off one good innings in 5, but that's not good enough at the CWC.
That's about the same ratio as Munro.
-
@shark said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
@SynicBast said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
@rotated said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
Hypothetical - after having been passed over at the IPL auction Baz declares himself available for CWC if needed. Would he make your squad, if not how close would he get for you?
Not sure he would get close anymore - he's a very known quantity by opposition bowlers all around the world, personally I think his reaction time and batspeed has diminished significantly - and the CWC is in England, meaning Dukes balls which means technical aptitude is far more important in an ODI context than elsewhere. Sure he might bring off one good innings in 5, but that's not good enough at the CWC.
That's about the same ratio as Munro.
Which is why I'm not a fan of Munro - he's more of a T20 specialist - if he had to bat it would be within the last 5 overs, but he doesn't offer anything outside his batting which precludes him from anywhere in the middle order anyway. Munro is your prototypical one dimensional player.
-
@shark said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
Quite a few relatively oddball suggestions there. There's no real reason to look further at Bracewell or at Rutherford, in the context of the current squad and returning players. As for not taking two spinners, you may have a case but I'd take two.
Can only really go on scorecards but Braces was in the squad and Rutherford was selected in the A squad against India and has kept ticking over since then - so both surely are in the frame. Rutherford isn't contracted though.
Re covering for a middle order injury, that's easy in this squad. You have five batsmen anyway as three are six in my squad and they can be juggled due to the flexibility provided by Latham and Munro, then there are 2-3 all rounders (if you include Santner as one) and a batting back up 'keeper in Seifert.
I may be looking for a guy that doesn't exist, but I'd want another batsman who has a bit more versatility and can play the middle innings and/or begin the acceleration around the 40th over if required. Munro happens to open - but I'd class him as more of a dasher with one gear and needs to either open or close the innings. If we lose Taylor or Williamson - aside from being fucked - Nicholls obviously slides up but we would need another bat at 5 who is able to come in anywhere after the 15th over at 3 down and play us back into the game.
The temptation is to say de Grandhomme who does have the talent and application to bat 25 overs in an ODI against quality bowling ticking over the strike. But like Elliott (I know...) or Harris if he bats 25 overs you have merely saved faced and almost certainly not scored enough runs.
The situation is virtually the same as last CWC. When it comes to the finals the only obvious path to victory on a low scoring pitch Boult and Southee outbowling the opposition and in high scoring games Guppy, Kane or Taylor need a century or we will lose.
-
@rotated said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
@shark said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
Quite a few relatively oddball suggestions there. There's no real reason to look further at Bracewell or at Rutherford, in the context of the current squad and returning players. As for not taking two spinners, you may have a case but I'd take two.
Can only really go on scorecards but Braces was in the squad and Rutherford was selected in the A squad against India and has kept ticking over since then - so both surely are in the frame. Rutherford isn't contracted though.
Re covering for a middle order injury, that's easy in this squad. You have five batsmen anyway as three are six in my squad and they can be juggled due to the flexibility provided by Latham and Munro, then there are 2-3 all rounders (if you include Santner as one) and a batting back up 'keeper in Seifert.
italicised textI may be looking for a guy that doesn't exist, but I'd want another batsman who has a bit more versatility and can play the middle innings and/or begin the acceleration around the 40th over if required. Munro happens to open - but I'd class him as more of a dasher with one gear and needs to either open or close the innings. If we lose Taylor or Williamson - aside from being fucked - Nicholls obviously slides up but we would need another bat at 5 who is able to come in anywhere after the 15th over at 3 down and play us back into the game.
The temptation is to say de Grandhomme who does have the talent and application to bat 25 overs in an ODI against quality bowling ticking over the strike. But like Elliott (I know...) or Harris if he bats 25 overs you have merely saved faced and almost certainly not scored enough runs.
The situation is virtually the same as last CWC. When it comes to the finals the only obvious path to victory on a low scoring pitch Boult and Southee outbowling the opposition and in high scoring games Guppy, Kane or Taylor need a century or we will lose.
That guy is possibly Anderson playing as a batsman.
-
@rotated I was wondering just the other day about Baz, mainly in the context of it being unfortunate timing that we don't have him at his peak right now, to go with Guppy, Kane, Rossco, Trent et al. Seems he smacked 56 last night, but otherwise his form hasn't been good enough.
I think that if we lost a middle order player then Latham would bat at 5.
I think we need to use Munro as an opener and just hope for the best - for me, Tom Latham just doesn't generate the necessary strike rate and that puts too much reliance on Guppy (initially) to hit out. I think Latham plays, because he's the best keeper - but he floats in the order - batting six if we lose early wickets - dropping down if we need more firepower.
Munro
Guptill
Williamson
Taylor
Nicholls
Latham
Neesham
Santner
Southee
Ferguson
BoultPlus: Sodhi, Seifert, de Grandhomme and probably Henry, but maybe yet another spinner (if we're mainly going to play two specialist spinners, as was suggested as a possibility by Hesson).
-
-
@LABCAT said in Black Caps 2019 Cricket World Cup Squad:
Latham is actually the incumbent 5 and Nicholls was just moved up while he took a rest for the last series.
I would say it will remain that way as Nicholls looks to have more ability than Latham to hit from ball one.
Holy cow, it almost sounds like we have, dare I say it, depth
-
@LABCAT Right on both counts, I think.
In fact, Tom could float significantly more than I've outlined above. If, like yesterday, we lose two early wickets, he could potentially bat at four (or even three) to provide more protection for Rossco (and/or Kane).
-
This whole generating SR to take pressure off Guppy thing while not irrelevent, isn't really a case to carry on with Munro either.
Munro's SR is 106.69 with an average of 26 and that means he faces 25 balls for 26 runs on average. That's not much. Only 7 times in 42 innings has he passed 50. So 16% of the time he contributes to a signficant fast start and takes the pressure off Guppy to score quickly. Fuck all.
Latham's SR is 82.38. Averaging 33, that means he faces around 39-40 balls on average per innings. Guptills is 86.60. If they bat through ten overs (60 balls) together we'll be around 55/0. 5.5 an over is where you want to be with wickets in hand with 15 overs to go in order to launch and go past 300, so why do we need to open the innings with a liability on the off-chance he'll have an 'on' day and score a quick 50?
Plus, dare I say it, but look at Munro's best ODI innings and tell me he isn't an archetypal flat track bully. Of his 7 fifties, they've come at run paradises Potchefstroom, Kanpur, Christchurch, Hamilton and the Mount, plus another against Bangladesh. The other one was in Wellington, not sure which ground but a NZ total of 317 suggests it wasn't a difficult track.
