• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks V All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
842 Posts 75 Posters 56.4k Views
Springboks V All Blacks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #642

    @mn5 said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    It cracks me up how someone about 188cm or 6 foot 2 like McCaw, Messam, Cane, Savea or whoever is considered 'short' yet pretty much anyone over is considered 'tall'

    Yeah - but, stand next to someone who is two inches taller than you and they're significantly taller.

    McCaw is listed at 187cm and Read is 193cm on the AB website - photos can be deceptive but there's plenty of these two on the internet and you struggle to find one where Richie looks taller - I reckon this one is a pretty reasonable representation.

    0_1538949481538_15027c27-972a-4146-b66c-657ce11b59a9-image.png

    But, the real difference in my view is when these guys have to match up against someone who's taller. Put Read against a 197cm lock in a lineout and he's got a chance of being competitive - Richie might as well be the little bald guy from Benny Hill! 🙂

    Same thing applies with weight in my view. A 90kg centre might not seem that much smaller than a 95kg centre - but when they come to tackle a 100kg centre - the littler guy is giving away significant bulk.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #643

    Hansen (and Henry before him) have constantly beaten the "You can't beat experience in the big games" drum, so I reckon the chances of them heading to RWC with their first choice starting XV including all of Mo'unga, ALB, Goodhue and Rieko is about nil.

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #644

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #645

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Just watched the game. After almost 15 years on this site I should have realised that the hysterical posts and opinions here almost always have little resemblance to the actual game that is played.

    Piss poor tackling and ball retention were the problem.

    Try watching it sober this time

    Follow your own advice.

    Soooo, no dramas then? Just make a cpuple of tackles and hold a bit of ball and it's golden? Really?

    Yes really. Or are tackles and ball retention no longer important in rugby?

    they are the most important things!! and you made them sound trivial. And they weren't the only issue, not by a long shot.

    The response to pressure by certain players was far from ideal.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to 98blueandgold on last edited by
    #646

    @98blueandgold said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    ... SA had 67% of ball!!! if we had that what would score have been.

    36 - 34 to South Africa like in Welly?

    (But I do a agree with your point.)

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #647

    I think a telling indicator from the MoTM thread is Sam Whitelock has zero votes. In the absence of BBBR we have really needed him to stand up, but he has not risen to the occasion. Sam is a very very good lock, but jesus he's had a workload this year, the bloke looks like he needs a couple of months off.

    BovidaeB RapidoR A 3 Replies Last reply
    5
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #648

    @mariner4life I was thinking the same thing while watching the game. Whitelock's workload will need to be managed on the EOYT because there can't be much petrol left in the tank. I expect he'll only play Bled III and the English and Irish tests while a fresh BBBR gets more time on the field. A big chance for Tuipulotu to step up in those other games.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #649

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Just watched the game. After almost 15 years on this site I should have realised that the hysterical posts and opinions here almost always have little resemblance to the actual game that is played.

    Piss poor tackling and ball retention were the problem.

    Try watching it sober this time

    Follow your own advice.

    Soooo, no dramas then? Just make a cpuple of tackles and hold a bit of ball and it's golden? Really?

    Yes really. Or are tackles and ball retention no longer important in rugby?

    they are the most important things!! and you made them sound trivial. And they weren't the only issue, not by a long shot.

    The response to pressure by certain players was far from ideal.

    No I didn't. Not in the slightest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #650

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Just watched the game. After almost 15 years on this site I should have realised that the hysterical posts and opinions here almost always have little resemblance to the actual game that is played.

    Piss poor tackling and ball retention were the problem.

    in that case i have no idea what this post means.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #651

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Just watched the game. After almost 15 years on this site I should have realised that the hysterical posts and opinions here almost always have little resemblance to the actual game that is played.

    Piss poor tackling and ball retention were the problem.

    in that case i have no idea what this post means.

    Where did I trivialise those aspects? I didn't. Quit while you're behind.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #652

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Just watched the game. After almost 15 years on this site I should have realised that the hysterical posts and opinions here almost always have little resemblance to the actual game that is played.

    Piss poor tackling and ball retention were the problem.

    in that case i have no idea what this post means.

    Where did I trivialise those aspects? I didn't. Quit while you're behind.

    well try replying in more than one fucking sentence.

    What. Does. Your. Post. Mean.

    Why were people over-dramatising the performance in your opinion?

    And for god's sake stop treating the forum like a game that has to be won.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #653
    This post is deleted!
    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #654
    This post is deleted!
    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #655

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I think a telling indicator from the MoTM thread is Sam Whitelock has zero votes. In the absence of BBBR we have really needed him to stand up, but he has not risen to the occasion. Sam is a very very good lock, but jesus he's had a workload this year, the bloke looks like he needs a couple of months off.

    Sam W was one of the few starters I considered giving my final vote for. I recall some nice clean kick-off receipts in the second half. But I skipped over him and handed all 3 to subs.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #656

    @rapido said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    I think a telling indicator from the MoTM thread is Sam Whitelock has zero votes. In the absence of BBBR we have really needed him to stand up, but he has not risen to the occasion. Sam is a very very good lock, but jesus he's had a workload this year, the bloke looks like he needs a couple of months off.

    Sam W was one of the few starters I considered giving my final vote for. I recall some nice clean kick-off receipts in the second half. But I skipped over him and handed all 3 to subs.

    his restart work was really strong. He took control of the long ones, and claimed the contested short ones.

    Didn't get much traction on their lineout for a change, despite it being a bit creaky in execution (some very lenient adjudicating of straight throws helped that, on both sides). But it's his carrying and ruck work that looks to have suffered the most.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #657

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Just watched the game. After almost 15 years on this site I should have realised that the hysterical posts and opinions here almost always have little resemblance to the actual game that is played.

    Piss poor tackling and ball retention were the problem.

    in that case i have no idea what this post means.

    Where did I trivialise those aspects? I didn't. Quit while you're behind.

    well try replying in more than one fucking sentence.

    What. Does. Your. Post. Mean.

    Why were people over-dramatising the performance in your opinion?

    And for god's sake stop treating the forum like a game that has to be won.

    I'm not responding to that. Stop acting like a cnut.

    dude, seriously. I'm trying to get your opinion on the performance, and you just won't provide anything!

    What more do you want ffs? Some shocking missed tackles led to tries and the ball security was terrible. Want me to go through it minute by minute? Seriously, what is your problem?

    mariner4lifeM KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #658

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @mariner4life said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    Just watched the game. After almost 15 years on this site I should have realised that the hysterical posts and opinions here almost always have little resemblance to the actual game that is played.

    Piss poor tackling and ball retention were the problem.

    in that case i have no idea what this post means.

    Where did I trivialise those aspects? I didn't. Quit while you're behind.

    well try replying in more than one fucking sentence.

    What. Does. Your. Post. Mean.

    Why were people over-dramatising the performance in your opinion?

    And for god's sake stop treating the forum like a game that has to be won.

    I'm not responding to that. Stop acting like a cnut.

    dude, seriously. I'm trying to get your opinion on the performance, and you just won't provide anything!

    What more do you want ffs? Some shocking missed tackles led to tries and the ball security was terrible. Want me to go through it minute by minute? Seriously, what is your problem?

    forget it.

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #659

    @rancid-schnitzel amazing how the ball retention improved when Mo'unga went to 10 and BB went to 15.

    No QuarterN Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #660

    @kiwimurph said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel amazing how the ball retention improved when Mo'unga went to 10 and BB went to 15.

    Yeah, instead of handing the ball to our washed up midfield he took the line on himself. Beauden should have done the same.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #661

    @kiwimurph said in Springboks V All Blacks:

    @rancid-schnitzel amazing how the ball retention improved when Mo'unga went to 10 and BB went to 15.

    That's a piss take surely? Unless of course you want to blame BB for forwards knocking on the ball or AS deliberately passing into an opposition player. Maybe blame him for the missed tackles as well?

    My criticism of BB would be that those kicks just aren't working. They were shit for the Canes and now shit for the ABs. The chase seems non-existent as well. Clearly these must be the tactics, but if these can't be executed then should be changed.

    The thing is these are vastly different points of a game. Defences are tired and it's a completely different dynamic. It's hard to know how BB will be at 10 after 50-60 minutes because he's always shifted to fullback.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Springboks V All Blacks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.