• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
1.1k Posts 95 Posters 75.6k Views
All Blacks v Springboks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1071

    I think if you really want to do some analysis you need to look at all the tests over that period, look at the HT/FT scores as well, because IIRC there have been a number we have been down at half time and end up winning comfortably, but not included in your 'close matches' analysis, surely they have dealt with the pressure in those games?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #1072

    @akan004 said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    Some fair enough points you raised, but I still maintain that the pressure experienced in the last ten to fifteen minutes in a tight Test is far more intense than what happens at 40th minute mark. Added to that, this Aussie team seems incapable of keeping up with us in the last quarter of the game unlike the Boks and the BIL. I'm not saying we are a bunch of no-hopers who crumble under pressure , but I think there are signs that this team may not be as composed as some of our prior teams. I may very well be wrong but I think it's fair to raise this as a discussion point.

    i prefer to look at how the game ended. Were we in a position to win it? Or were we stuck at our own end with no chance?

    The Bok game, and the drawn Lions test, we were down the right end, and only some great defense held us out. We weren't clueless how to win, or choking under the pressure, we were beaten by a team that did the right thing for just long enough. It happens.

    I would be more worried if we were getting blown out of the water in those last 10 minutes.

    What i find more interesting is how often we lose when we don't score 22 points. Since the start of 2015 we have failed to score 22 points 8 times. We lost 5 of those, and drew one.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1073

    @mariner4life there were deals in the Lions test too...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1074

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @akan004 cherry pick to make the sky fall?

    how about looking at it like this. in 21 tests we are 17-1-3. In 13 of those tests we have hosed them.

    We lost a game where we had 14 blokes for 3/4s of the game
    We lost a dead rubber Bledisloe away.
    We lost one of the best tests in years.

    You know, now i think about it, we are 0-3 where we have scored less points than the opposition. That's not what you expect from a team with this much talent.

    Try looking at it this way. We never, ever lose big. if it's a loss, it's by a bee's dick. We are balls deep in every game we play. That's a pretty sweet position to be in.

    What you say is true, except the implication that somehow winning big a lot is good.

    Having a situation of lots of big wins does not reduce our chances of losing. Our winning % has not changed just because the size of the victories has.

    The thing is that each game we win by 20 points is not much practice on to how to win hard games. I think that's the point of the original post.

    We tend to crack "inexplicably" in exactly the same way. An AB team expecting another romp gets a hard time by an opponent who defends sturdily and does not let our counter-attack get going.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #1075

    If we finish tight games the way we did this test then we'll win far more than we lose. We were absolutely dominating the final quarter, the Boks defended for their lives but still needed a fair slice of luck to avoid defeat. As @mariner4life says, if we were camped on our own line with no chance of victory that would be concerning, but as it stands we pretty much always finish the stronger team.

    If we can avoid conceding 31 points to 5 in the middle period then I think we should be OK.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #1076

    @chester-draws said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @akan004 cherry pick to make the sky fall?

    how about looking at it like this. in 21 tests we are 17-1-3. In 13 of those tests we have hosed them.

    We lost a game where we had 14 blokes for 3/4s of the game
    We lost a dead rubber Bledisloe away.
    We lost one of the best tests in years.

    You know, now i think about it, we are 0-3 where we have scored less points than the opposition. That's not what you expect from a team with this much talent.

    Try looking at it this way. We never, ever lose big. if it's a loss, it's by a bee's dick. We are balls deep in every game we play. That's a pretty sweet position to be in.

    What you say is true, except the implication that somehow winning big a lot is good.

    Say what? It's bad? Since when?

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • UniteU Offline
    UniteU Offline
    Unite
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #1077

    @akan004 said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    Copied this from Nigel Yalden's facebook page re BBBR.

    "Trust me mate, he's had a scan, even they say he hasn't. Reliably informed that he spend most of yesterday's training session running and down stair in Westpac Stadium. Picking that would jar the buggery out of any shoulder, so can't be too bad - we are inquiring though mate."

    Any more news from Nigel RE BBBR?

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to Unite on last edited by
    #1078

    @unite said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @akan004 said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    Copied this from Nigel Yalden's facebook page re BBBR.

    "Trust me mate, he's had a scan, even they say he hasn't. Reliably informed that he spend most of yesterday's training session running and down stair in Westpac Stadium. Picking that would jar the buggery out of any shoulder, so can't be too bad - we are inquiring though mate."

    Any more news from Nigel RE BBBR?

    Nothing new per his fb page.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #1079

    @booboo said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @chester-draws said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @akan004 cherry pick to make the sky fall?

    how about looking at it like this. in 21 tests we are 17-1-3. In 13 of those tests we have hosed them.

    We lost a game where we had 14 blokes for 3/4s of the game
    We lost a dead rubber Bledisloe away.
    We lost one of the best tests in years.

    You know, now i think about it, we are 0-3 where we have scored less points than the opposition. That's not what you expect from a team with this much talent.

    Try looking at it this way. We never, ever lose big. if it's a loss, it's by a bee's dick. We are balls deep in every game we play. That's a pretty sweet position to be in.

    What you say is true, except the implication that somehow winning big a lot is good.

    Say what? It's bad? Since when?

    Winning isn't bad. Just that winning big isn't necessarily better than winning small.

    Our recent massive victories over the Boks was not good preparation for the last game.

    We have a game plan that I think tends to magnify our strengths and our weaknesses. When we play well we win by lots. But we equally come unstuck when it doesn't work.

    I'd prefer a game plan that moved away from this emphasis on counter-attack, and assuming we wear our opposition down. I'd like to see us able to work on penetrating solid defences.

    Because when we hit the 2019 RWC you can bet no-one, crazy Australians aside, will attempt to beat us playing open rugby.

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #1080

    @chester-draws said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @booboo said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @chester-draws said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @akan004 cherry pick to make the sky fall?

    how about looking at it like this. in 21 tests we are 17-1-3. In 13 of those tests we have hosed them.

    We lost a game where we had 14 blokes for 3/4s of the game
    We lost a dead rubber Bledisloe away.
    We lost one of the best tests in years.

    You know, now i think about it, we are 0-3 where we have scored less points than the opposition. That's not what you expect from a team with this much talent.

    Try looking at it this way. We never, ever lose big. if it's a loss, it's by a bee's dick. We are balls deep in every game we play. That's a pretty sweet position to be in.

    What you say is true, except the implication that somehow winning big a lot is good.

    Say what? It's bad? Since when?

    Winning isn't bad. Just that winning big isn't necessarily better than winning small.

    Our recent massive victories over the Boks was not good preparation for the last game.

    We have a game plan that I think tends to magnify our strengths and our weaknesses. When we play well we win by lots. But we equally come unstuck when it doesn't work.

    I'd prefer a game plan that moved away from this emphasis on counter-attack, and assuming we wear our opposition down. I'd like to see us able to work on penetrating solid defences.

    Because when we hit the 2019 RWC you can bet no-one, crazy Australians aside, will attempt to beat us playing open rugby.

    But history has shown us that teams step up at the World Cup and a well organised, determined defence can be really hard to break down without taking a few risks. The All Blacks showed they could score 6 tries against such a defence without the defence every really crumbling.

    Hansen's message to J Barrett and A Smith (for it was they who took the bad decisions that led to tries) is not don't take quick throw-ins or don't take tap penalties . It will be don't take quick throw-ins from a kick that left the whole Bok defensive line in your face and don't take tap penalties when there is no huge gap to exploit. The whole mantra of the ABs since Henry took over is to make decisions based on what you see - the mantra is not "put away the razzle-dazzle until you're desperate". There will be mistakes playing like that but by forcing the opposition defence to make tough decisions under pressure eventually the gap will appear and the tries will come.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    14
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1081

    Be nice if that win got a few more Bok players keen to stay at home, rather than miss the opportunity to play the ABs...imagine how gutted these 2 guys will be not being able to step up for the next match AT HOME in front of thier own fans.

    Stuff
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Davesofthunder
    wrote on last edited by
    #1082

    What is the latest on World Rugby enforced player availability?

    Do internationals still take precedence and these players are choosing not to play? Or is that the club's contract can overrule international matches?

    I thought the rugby championship was in the official window and clubs couldn't refuse to release players?

    BovidaeB RapidoR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #1083

    I guess they are "choosing" not to play. Same as many PI players "choose" to turn down international honours when playing in France. However some of them were signed on when SA didn't pick overseas players so you can see how their clubs would be a bit miffed, the fact they'd be there during the international windows was probably reflected in their contract money.

    @Chester-Draws "Winning isn't bad. Just that winning big isn't necessarily better than winning small.

    Our recent massive victories over the Boks was not good preparation for the last game."

    That makes no sense at all, our previous game we won, just, by one point - and we should have lost.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Davesofthunder on last edited by
    #1084

    @davesofthunder said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    What is the latest on World Rugby enforced player availability?

    Do internationals still take precedence and these players are choosing not to play? Or is that the club's contract can overrule international matches?

    I thought the rugby championship was in the official window and clubs couldn't refuse to release players?

    3 Matches in the June Global Release Period and 3 Matches in the November Global Release Period.

    For inter-hemisphere availability for matches outside those Global Release Periods the club would need to agree to release the player.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Davesofthunder on last edited by
    #1085

    @davesofthunder said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    What is the latest on World Rugby enforced player availability?

    Do internationals still take precedence and these players are choosing not to play? Or is that the club's contract can overrule international matches?

    I thought the rugby championship was in the official window and clubs couldn't refuse to release players?

    The TRC (and the 6 nations) are not in the international window. Never have been.

    That's why a pre-requisite to be included in the competition is that the nation has home based professional rugby so they have control of player availability. Hence Argentina joining TRC only after Sanzar increased SR to include Jaguares. Hence why a PI nation will never be included

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #1086

    @kiwipie said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @chester-draws said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @booboo said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @chester-draws said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v Springboks:

    @akan004 cherry pick to make the sky fall?

    how about looking at it like this. in 21 tests we are 17-1-3. In 13 of those tests we have hosed them.

    We lost a game where we had 14 blokes for 3/4s of the game
    We lost a dead rubber Bledisloe away.
    We lost one of the best tests in years.

    You know, now i think about it, we are 0-3 where we have scored less points than the opposition. That's not what you expect from a team with this much talent.

    Try looking at it this way. We never, ever lose big. if it's a loss, it's by a bee's dick. We are balls deep in every game we play. That's a pretty sweet position to be in.

    What you say is true, except the implication that somehow winning big a lot is good.

    Say what? It's bad? Since when?

    Winning isn't bad. Just that winning big isn't necessarily better than winning small.

    Our recent massive victories over the Boks was not good preparation for the last game.

    We have a game plan that I think tends to magnify our strengths and our weaknesses. When we play well we win by lots. But we equally come unstuck when it doesn't work.

    I'd prefer a game plan that moved away from this emphasis on counter-attack, and assuming we wear our opposition down. I'd like to see us able to work on penetrating solid defences.

    Because when we hit the 2019 RWC you can bet no-one, crazy Australians aside, will attempt to beat us playing open rugby.

    But history has shown us that teams step up at the World Cup and a well organised, determined defence can be really hard to break down without taking a few risks. The All Blacks showed they could score 6 tries against such a defence without the defence every really crumbling.

    Hansen's message to J Barrett and A Smith (for it was they who took the bad decisions that led to tries) is not don't take quick throw-ins or don't take tap penalties . It will be don't take quick throw-ins from a kick that left the whole Bok defensive line in your face and don't take tap penalties when there is no huge gap to exploit. The whole mantra of the ABs since Henry took over is to make decisions based on what you see - the mantra is not "put away the razzle-dazzle until you're desperate". There will be mistakes playing like that but by forcing the opposition defence to make tough decisions under pressure eventually the gap will appear and the tries will come.

    I agree KP. People were saying there were similarities with Cardiff. Rubbish.

    Cardiff we struggled to score points. Last Saturday we looked likely throughout and as we saw crossed the line 6 times. We kept attacking when the pressure was on which has been a successful formula. We made mistakes and whilst disappointing, it was nothing like Cardiff where we looked rattled and disorganised closing that out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1087

    Who is the defence coach at the moment? They've shipped a few points over the last few games.

    taniwharugbyT N 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #1088

    @toddy Scott McLeod...?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #1089

    Anyone got stats from the test?

    In that second half we really mixed up the lineout jumpers. Value of having 4 genuine reliable options.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1090

    @act-crusader

    0_1537508011482_00ef48f6-b445-447f-bb84-cc1110944104-image.png

    0_1537508149537_47f99e71-0d75-4b0e-a1f4-7dfc62300a2d-image.png

    TA - try assist
    LB - line break
    LBA - line break assists
    RUN - runs
    RM - run metres
    OFF - offloads
    TB - tackle busts
    LOW - line-outs won

    Source: Fox Sports

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks v Springboks
Rugby Matches
allblacksspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.