• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
109 Posts 35 Posters 5.6k Views
Wallabies v Springboks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SapetyviS Offline
    SapetyviS Offline
    Sapetyvi
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #21

    @antipodean I think he has also matured there, I remember one season at the Tahs he lost noticeable weight, but got it back during the season.
    There is nothing the coach can do if a player goes home and eats like shit, that change needs to come from the player.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gumboot
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Cheap-shot specialist Kepu dumped. Good.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Gumboot on last edited by NTA
    #23

    @gumboot well it was only fair after cheap shot merchant Moody got a rest in Nelson. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

    Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #25

    @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

    Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

    I’ve nver been a fan of Foley but I thought he’s was one of the better Aussies. Saved a try last game with great defense, Real put your body on the line stuff. And set up a try soon after with a nice break. Seems odd to drop him.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #26

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    I’ll now be watching this hopefully after seeing that 10-12 axis. Nice move by Cheika, roll the dice.

    Didn’t think Foley did much wrong, but doesn’t quite look himself at mo

    I’ve nver been a fan of Foley but I thought he’s was one of the better Aussies. Saved a try last game with great defense, Real put your body on the line stuff. And set up a try soon after with a nice break. Seems odd to drop him.

    Yeah not disagreeing with those moments, but he just didn’t seem to really spark the back line like he has in previous.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    CatograndeC BovidaeB MajorRageM 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #28

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    Cheika desperately rolling the dice in hope rather than expectation?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SapetyviS Offline
    SapetyviS Offline
    Sapetyvi
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Foley needs to get a rest at some point and not much options available at the moment. Toomua will probably slot a lot at first five to give Beale some freedom tho.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Beale at 10, boom or bust....he could cause havoc and set the backline alight, or he could just as easily self implode ala Kwade.

    Might be worth watching.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #31

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    On the plus side at least the loose forwards will be closer when Beale inevitably misses tackles down his channel.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #32

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #33

    @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

    I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

    I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    I found it interesting in the media they are talking about Foley being demoted and Cheika saying he took the demotion well. Maybe semantics but wouldn't it be better to come out and say we are going for a different attacking style and Beale is better suited. Or we need to give other players a chance in crucial positions to improve our depth. Shag Is the master in this tactic.

    Seems a bit of a public shaming to say, yeah Foleys been a bit shit and hes been dropped as a result. Would do wonders for the players confidence.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #35

    @act-crusader said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    @majorrage said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    @kirwan said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Will Beale be better though? They finally have Beale looking comfortable in a position, dangerous at times, now they move him?

    I think he wants Beale to have more ball. Which I whole heartedly agree with from his point of view. He's the best chance Australia have of creating something out of nothing.

    I agree he needs more ball, but as we know at 10 you want more steady and directing play rather than off the cuff.

    I’d be concerned about him crabbing across field which he has a tendency to do sometimes. Giteau did it as well when he shifted to 10.

    Agreed. Get him more involved where he's dangerous, at 12 / 15.

    It's a bit rich to blame Foley when other players are pushing passes, giving away penalties, falling off tackles etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

    Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

    David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
    
    New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
    
    After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
    
    The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
    
    Beth Newman  /  Sep 6, 2018

    Pocock ruled out, Samu joins Wallabies side to play Boks

    Pocock ruled out, Samu joins Wallabies side to play Boks
    jeggaJ M boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by jegga
    #37

    @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

    Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

    David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
    
    New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
    
    After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
    
    The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
    
    Beth Newman  /  Sep 6, 2018

    Pocock ruled out, Samu joins Wallabies side to play Boks

    Pocock ruled out, Samu joins Wallabies side to play Boks

    Carrying the weight of the world on your shoulders will do that to your neck.

    1 Reply Last reply
    13
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Lucky they have the 6 million dollar man in their side, I'm sure he will easily cover the work of Pocock.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    There is more balance in that loose forward trio but Hooper will need to play a little tighter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #40

    @stargazer said in Wallabies v Springboks:

    Pocock ruled out with a neck injury. Pete Samu replaces him in the starting side.

    Looks like the ABs are blamed for the injury 🙄

    David Pocock has been ruled out of Saturday’s Brisbane Test with a neck injury.
    
    New Zealand targeted Pocock heavily in the breakdown in their two Bledisloe Tests and the Kiwis’ treatment left the flanker with neck soreness that he is yet to fully shake off. 
    
    After the Auckland Bledisloe Test, Pocock could barely move his neck and nearly a fortnight later he is still suffering stiffness amid concerns for his long-term health. 
    
    The flanker will be replaced in the starting side by Pete Samu.
    
    Beth Newman  /  Sep 6, 2018

    Pocock ruled out, Samu joins Wallabies side to play Boks

    Pocock ruled out, Samu joins Wallabies side to play Boks

    It's a fair point, there would ahve been 2 or 3 yellow cards vs ABs if those neck rolls had been done a couple of years ago, when they were the current hobby-horse of the IRB. It seems refs can only have one area to target for cards at a time, high shots as it stands now.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Wallabies v Springboks
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.