Bledisloe II
-
@chris-b said in Bledisloe II:
@machpants Maybe a World XV coached by Schmidt that played a similar lead up as the Lions?
Be mainly the Lions with a few reinforcements from Oz, France and SA.
Do they get to bring their own crazy refs? If so, yes I agree.
-
@bovidae said in Bledisloe II:
@taniwharugby Injury was not a factor according to the Stuff article.
"We wanted a specialist second five," explained Hansen. "Alby (Lienert-Brown) has been playing a lot of his rugby at 13. Whilst we're very happy with his performance [in Sydney], we love what he does for us off the bench.
"He brings a security, a sense of understanding of what's needed in that area and Ngani is more of a starting-type player. It just made sense."
Yep nice one Shag. You may as well put the NH contact under ALB's fucken nose yourself. You could have equally said: "We didn't pick Ngani in the initial squad and wanted him instead to go away and work on his communication, which he's done for an entire game. Alby was outstanding for us at 12 in Bledisloe 1 in what was virtually a starting role but despite that we've brought Ngani straight back in ahead of him".
-
@shark said in Bledisloe II:
@bovidae said in Bledisloe II:
@taniwharugby Injury was not a factor according to the Stuff article.
"We wanted a specialist second five," explained Hansen. "Alby (Lienert-Brown) has been playing a lot of his rugby at 13. Whilst we're very happy with his performance [in Sydney], we love what he does for us off the bench.
"He brings a security, a sense of understanding of what's needed in that area and Ngani is more of a starting-type player. It just made sense."
Yep nice one Shag. You may as well put the NH contact under ALB's fucken nose yourself. You could have equally said: "We didn't pick Ngani in the initial squad and wanted him instead to go away and work on his communication, which he's done for an entire game. Alby was outstanding for us at 12 in Bledisloe 1 in what was virtually a starting role but despite that we've brought Ngani straight back in ahead of him".
testify brother!!!
What the actual fuck? You arrogant dickheads. A player of his quality is not going to be happy sitting behind sicknote 1 & 2, and now a ring-in. None of the shit they say makes any fucking sense.
And to the back, where we have our best 15 playing 14, where his last runs there were a bit ordinary. And the nation's most overhyped player gets a start.
Way to select a squad there guys. Nothing adds steel to a team like picking a bunch of Hurricanes.
-
I don't really see the big problem. The specialist 12 starts at 12 whilst the very effective bench player who covers 12-13 is on the bench covering 12 and 13?
In modern rugby the bench is very important and ALB made a very strong case last weekend that he is perfectly suited to the 23 shirt for the big AB games moving forward.
With SBW due back next game the pressure is on Laumape to perform. And if he does, the pressure will be on SBW.
-
@mariner4life said in Bledisloe II:
@shark said in Bledisloe II:
@bovidae said in Bledisloe II:
@taniwharugby Injury was not a factor according to the Stuff article.
"We wanted a specialist second five," explained Hansen. "Alby (Lienert-Brown) has been playing a lot of his rugby at 13. Whilst we're very happy with his performance [in Sydney], we love what he does for us off the bench.
"He brings a security, a sense of understanding of what's needed in that area and Ngani is more of a starting-type player. It just made sense."
Yep nice one Shag. You may as well put the NH contact under ALB's fucken nose yourself. You could have equally said: "We didn't pick Ngani in the initial squad and wanted him instead to go away and work on his communication, which he's done for an entire game. Alby was outstanding for us at 12 in Bledisloe 1 in what was virtually a starting role but despite that we've brought Ngani straight back in ahead of him".
testify brother!!!
What the actual fuck? You arrogant dickheads. A player of his quality is not going to be happy sitting behind sicknote 1 & 2, and now a ring-in. None of the shit they say makes any fucking sense.
And to the back, where we have our best 15 playing 14, where his last runs there were a bit ordinary. And the nation's most overhyped player gets a start.
Way to select a squad there guys. Nothing adds steel to a team like picking a bunch of Hurricanes.
GFYs
-
Not that I agree with the decision, but, I think that ALB is a lock for the RWC (no matter what) and Laumape is only there if one of the others is out injured. Hmmm, so basically what I'm saying is both ALB and Laumape are a lock for the RWC.
DMac and ALB seem to be in the same boat - in the team but utilised from the bench, if Crotty and Ioane aren't injured then DMac and ALB are still in the team and Laumape and Barrett watch from the stands.
-
@kiwimurph said in Bledisloe II:
I don't really see the big problem. The specialist 12 starts at 12 whilst the very effective bench player who covers 12-13 is on the bench covering 12 and 13?
In modern rugby the bench is very important and ALB made a very strong case last weekend that he is perfectly suited to the 23 shirt for the big AB games moving forward.
With SBW due back next game the pressure is on Laumape to perform. And if he does, the pressure will be on SBW.
This is some bullshit right there "the bench is important" is the biggest fallacy. Having your best players play most of the game is more important. If the bench was so important we wouldn't stock it with deadshits like TJP and Savea. And One of Retallic or Whitelock would be there to be awesome in the last 20.
The best players start, ALB is better than Laumape. Players who spend their international career starting against Argentina, Scotland and Italy, and benching the actual good sides end up in France a lot quicker.
-
@mariner4life said in Bledisloe II:
@kiwimurph said in Bledisloe II:
I don't really see the big problem. The specialist 12 starts at 12 whilst the very effective bench player who covers 12-13 is on the bench covering 12 and 13?
In modern rugby the bench is very important and ALB made a very strong case last weekend that he is perfectly suited to the 23 shirt for the big AB games moving forward.
With SBW due back next game the pressure is on Laumape to perform. And if he does, the pressure will be on SBW.
This is some bullshit right there "the bench is important" is the biggest fallacy. Having your best players play most of the game is more important. If the bench was so important we wouldn't stock it with deadshits like TJP and Savea. And One of Retallic or Whitelock would be there to be awesome in the last 20.
The best players start, ALB is better than Laumape. Players who spend their international career starting against Argentina, Scotland and Italy, and benching the actual good sides end up in France a lot quicker.
Agree, doesn’t matter if ALB covers multiple positions or not. He’s a more rounded player and better 12 than Laumape and should start.
-
I basically agree, but I don't think he defends that well at 12. I'm sure he missed at least two last week as the inside defender. Having said that, Laumape is probably worse, so...
Long term, ALB may have to consider moving to 12 (i.e., at the Chiefs), because Goodhue looks a solid gold long term 13 to me. I think he makes better decisions on defence than ALB, and does the basics well. I loved his straight run and draw and pass last week in the lead up to his try, that created the space for Ioane to exploit and could easily have been cut out if he hadn't kept his line correctly.
Goodhue may not be as good at pulling out offloads that lead to try assists, which ALB has consistently done in the black shirt. However, from memory, many of those have been in the last 20, often as a replacement...
-
@gt12 said in Bledisloe II:
I basically agree, but I don't think he defends that well at 12. I'm sure he missed at least two last week as the inside defender. Having said that, Laumape is probably worse, so...
Long term, ALB may have to consider moving to 12 (i.e., at the Chiefs), because Goodhue looks a solid gold long term 13 to me. I think he makes better decisions on defence than ALB, and does the basics well. I loved his straight run and draw and pass last week in the lead up to his try, that created the space for Ioane to exploit and could easily have been cut out if he hadn't kept his line correctly.
Goodhue may not be as good at pulling out offloads that lead to try assists, which ALB has consistently done in the black shirt. However, from memory, many of those have been in the last 20, often as a replacement...
this post is pretty fucking light on detail, and pretty long on complete guess work.
Goodhue was good, and should be there for a while (lets see what season 2 brings first though aye?) but a hallmark of ALB in Black for me is the way he straightens and links with his outsides. It's not like these attributes are only there in one player.
Doesn't defend well at 12? Based on? All those linebreaks last week? All players miss tackles occassionally, but does anyone really see ALB as this defensive weakness?
It's like people are scratching around for ways to agree with the selectors. Laumape is straight up not as good a player as ALB, at 12 or anywhere else. This selection will not be the winning or losing of the game, so in the end it doesn't matter. But there have been some fucking strange selection decisions this year, with some equally strange public explanations given.
-
Isn't Hansen's selection of Laumape really about player development ? (and getting mariner's tits in a tangle)
Don't want to jinx us but we have the wood on Oz and its Eden Park. Hansen can afford to try this out. I think ALB is actually ahead of Laumape in the real pecking order, i.e., if we were playing for the World Cup.
-
@mariner4life maybe they have been reading all your posts moaning about how predictable the squads have been and how boring it is
-
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe II:
@mariner4life maybe they have been reading all your posts moaning about how predictable the squads have been and how boring it is
it's really nice to have something to bitch about. The player drain is finally having a positive benefit. And it's taking the heat of some other bench players...
-
@frank said in Bledisloe II:
Isn't Hansen's selection of Laumape really about player development ? (and getting mariner's tits in a tangle)
Don't want to jinx us but we have the wood on Oz and its Eden Park. Hansen can afford to try this out. I think ALB is actually ahead of Laumape in the real pecking order, i.e., if we were playing for the World Cup.
fair point. If you are locked in to Crotty and SBW in the midfield mix, then you had better develop another 2 players to cover the many, many tests they are unavailable for.
-
@mariner4life said in Bledisloe II:
locked in to Crotty and SBW in the midfield mix, then you had better develop another 2 players to cover the many, many tests
thats the thing isnt it, if SBW & Crotty were fit, they would be starting and I expect this to be the plan thorugh to the RWC unless one of ALB, Goodhue or Laumape really put thier hand up with some consistently high standard of performances to make the selectors rethink things.
-
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe II:
@mariner4life said in Bledisloe II:
locked in to Crotty and SBW in the midfield mix, then you had better develop another 2 players to cover the many, many tests
thats the thing isnt it, if SBW & Crotty were fit, they would be starting and I expect this to be the plan thorugh to the RWC unless one of ALB, Goodhue or Laumape really put thier hand up with some consistently high standard of performances to make the selectors rethink things.
that's a shit plan. based on history, what are the chances of that midfield making it through 3 knockout games in 3 weeks?
So Crotty can play all his rugby at 12, but be considered a starting 13, but ALB can't go the other way? These fluffybunnies are making shit up on the fly
-
@mariner4life not saying I agree with the plan, but that's the impression I get of what the plan is a year out from the RWC....I might be wrong, it happened once before.
-
Are you new here? Stats do back up my assertion of the missed tackles, but I'm happy to agree that I'm speculating based on my half-drunk observations, and especially since I started that last post with 'I basically agree' (i.e., ALB should be there starting), I wonder why your panties are so bunched up. I guess shit has been so boring for so long, even this little debate is fun? If we were picking for a WC final (as @Frank mentioned, I'm sure that ALB would be starting anyway).
I haven't had a chance to watch a replay, but I may get a chance today, in which case I'll check where ALB was defending, because they seemed to switch around a lot. I may have mistook those defensive errors.
-
@gt12 Stats are irrelevant. Hansen hasn't picked ALB and @mariner4life has a poster of ALB in his bedroom.
-
@mariner4life said in Bledisloe II:
@taniwharugby said in Bledisloe II:
@mariner4life maybe they have been reading all your posts moaning about how predictable the squads have been and how boring it is
it's really nice to have something to bitch about. The player drain is finally having a positive benefit. And it's taking the heat of some other bench players...
I agree, but you should join me on the Tongan Frizell train, Laumape is good enough to be AB and plays enough to be an AB, and has been in the squad on merit before.
