All Blacks v France Test #2
-
Gutted. Another game ruined + NH media will lose their nut. This will be a massacre. Was probably a red card thoigh although i wojld have given yellow.
-
-
Ah man this is going to he such a hiding.
-
The eyes on the ball thing is a commentators rule , they always mention it , but not in the rule book
-
Great hit by squire
-
The ref had no choice, but the game has been screwed. Was looking for a close, hard-fought game - this could end up being a training run.
-
DMac at five-eighth, so technically it's still an even game.
-
Ah. Liam „goes missing“ squire.
-
Ruined test but that's the laws and ref had no choice. But for me this is the French, they need to deal with it and not capitulate. Last year vs Lions ABs lost SBW and led for most of game. All about mentality as was shown last week.
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
-
@tordah said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Does a HIA fail automatically mean he's concussed?
Yes. He has to pass one this week, before he can play again.
-
-
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
-
@antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
DMac at five-eighth, so technically it's still an even game.
And it will be claimed by media that he is capable of playing 10 for the ABs because they’ve had a comfortable win.
-
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@baron-silas-greenback said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@rancid-schnitzel said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
@mariner4life said in All Blacks v France Test #2:
Okay. That shouldn't be a red. Intent should count.
What? He didn't intend to be a fucking idiot? Too stupid to know what he was doing?
Calm the fuck down.
Eyes on the ball. Gets a shoulder from ioane just before contact. Bangs in to a guy who jumps. Never grabs. Doesn't run through him. Yellow all day. But i think a red needs a higher threshold.
I respectfully disagree. That was incredibly dangerous. He was never going to get that ball. He barely left the ground ffs. Clear red all day.
Outcome was dangerous. But i think the player needs to have some intent to injure before a red becomes an option.
I am aware i am in disagreement with the laws here, and it's just an opinion.
I don't like that the same action gets a different card if barrett doesnt land on his head.
How would you accurately judge intent? Keeping eyes on ball as you break a guys neck?
Do you think he meant to tip him on his head?
No idea. That's the point.
-
@baron-silas-greenback I think there are tests tomorrow and again on Monday and Tuesday whether he passes tomorrow's or not
