• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders vs Waratahs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderswaratahs
243 Posts 45 Posters 14.5k Views
Crusaders vs Waratahs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #171

    @bones said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    He's an All Black. Probably won't even be cited.

    I hear he’s a good Christian too....

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #172

    What an idiot. Going to be a ban for sure. How the hell did the refs miss that?

    So possibly back to square one for the ABs No1 jersey.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #173

    @bones said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    He's an All Black. Probably won't even be cited.

    Are you part Aussie? 🤔

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #174

    @nta you wish.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #175

    Also from reddit: Moody's forearm (not elbow?) seems to hit Beale's chest (not his head). May depend on camera angle; obviously, we don't have other angles. Would also need more than one frame. Whatever the case may be, it's not the kind of thing I like seeing in rugby, but it may affect the type of offending he'd be cited for (if cited at all & entry-level of the sanction).

    0_1526128497386_283b5526-5e7f-4fff-aea7-d7b8a34cc828-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #176

    Frame by frame:

    0_1526130798857_e78d5512-eec9-4da1-bb6c-9fb89a775427-image.png

    0_1526130830636_654a613c-9f12-4cb8-a4aa-ebfc6daaf29e-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #177

    @Stargazer Nothing in it.

    Too early.....

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Stargazer
    #178

    @act-crusader Frame by frame, it looks less serious than I initially thought. The square frame used on reddit is also a bit misleading, because you cannot see the movement from Beale before that first frame. If you look at it in the YouTube video, you can see that Beale first moves in the direction of Moody and then suddenly stops at the same time as Moody moving forward (Beale standing in-between him and the posts). What makes it look ugly is Moody leading with the forearm/elbow. If he had just fended him off with his hand, there would be absolutely nothing in it.

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    The 4th and 5th frame look pretty damning. No need for that kind of filth in the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by Toddy
    #180

    Just watched the video and it's even worse. How the fuck the ref and tmo missed that I've got no idea. Worst bit of reffing this season so far.

    taniwharugbyT canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #181

    @toddy yeah looks worse in real time than frame by frame"...can't believe the normally over officious TMO missed it let alone the ref.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #183

    @stargazer said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    @act-crusader Frame by frame, it looks less serious than I initially thought.

    Would you still think the same if was Akira elbowing Evans?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Unite on last edited by Rapido
    #184

    @unite said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    Link here to Moody elbow

    https://reddit.app.link/WI08GyTeRM

    That's hopeless. Even if he'd just gently pushed him in the chest, how the fuck does that try causing obstruction get let fly. It was probably 'immaterial'.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Online
    KruseK Online
    Kruse
    replied to Mick Gold Coast QLD on last edited by
    #185

    @mick-gold-coast-qld said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    At 33 minutes Waratahs are 29 blot. Nek minnit …! 🤡

    (splutter) .... Cultural Appropriation ! (splutter)
    outraged.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Toddy on last edited by Stargazer
    #186

    @toddy said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    @stargazer said in Crusaders vs Waratahs:

    @act-crusader Frame by frame, it looks less serious than I initially thought.

    Would you still think the same if was Akira elbowing Evans?

    Don't be such a dickhead. Moody should be - and has been - cited. The only reason why I said it looked less serious than in real time/speed is that the first impact seems to be with the chest, not the head/neck. I've also said that there may be other camera angles that we haven't seen. The footage that we are able to see isn't conclusive, but it looks bad. Do you always only read the first sentence of a post or do you suffer from dyslexia?

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #187

    It has produced a couple of good tweets, if nothing else

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #188

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    So what do we reckon he'll get?

    4 weeks for an early guilty plea, discounted by 2 weeks for good record, mitigating factors and showing remorse?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by Stargazer
    #190

    @taniwharugby If I had to guess, they'd start with 6 weeks and it would end in a 3 week suspension. Might be a week more or less.

    Edited to add that my reason for expecting the mid range entry point of 6 weeks is that that was what they started at when they looked at Chance Peni's high tackle on Israel Dagg. Not the same offence, but similar in severity (albeit with a clearly different outcome; Beale could play on, while Dagg got injured and will be out of action for weeks). Peni ended up with a 5-week suspension because of his bad record.

    The dangerous tackle from Conraad van Vuuren also started at 6 weeks and ended in a 3-week suspension. Also: Scott Higginbotham.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders vs Waratahs
Rugby Matches
crusaderswaratahs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.