Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
-
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
This whole saga reinforces the lesson that 'you never win against a dickhead by being an equal or bigger dickhead'.
Which goes for pretty much everyone in this whole debacle.
All fun aside I agree that if the S.A. crowd do start chanting about CW and her premarital habits then that is pretty feral and pretty fucked.
-
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
This whole saga reinforces the lesson that 'you never win against a dickhead by being an equal or bigger dickhead'.
Which goes for pretty much everyone in this whole debacle.
All fun aside I agree that if the S.A. crowd do start chanting about CW and her premarital habits then that is pretty feral and pretty fucked.
Agreed. Anything more than masks only is uncalled for
-
@canefan said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@mn5 said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
This whole saga reinforces the lesson that 'you never win against a dickhead by being an equal or bigger dickhead'.
Which goes for pretty much everyone in this whole debacle.
All fun aside I agree that if the S.A. crowd do start chanting about CW and her premarital habits then that is pretty feral and pretty fucked.
Agreed. Anything more than masks only is uncalled for
Whereas on the other hand they can fill their boots with giving hubby shit for all I care.
Those that live by the sword and all of that.....
-
My opinion of DDD and his culpability in this incident is pretty apparent.
But those masks are pretty fucked.
Massive disgust for me.
-
-
-
@taniwharugby said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
and of course, the question is either she or DDD taller than Ardie?
-
@nzzp said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
@jegga ever had breakfast with her?
And if so, how did you ask her? A phone call or just give her a nudge?
-
@duluth said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
Purchased
I'll post something later about how shit or not the service is
Watchable
An occasional stutter in the stream (I have a 100Mbs connection) and there is tearing on fast movement.
Tested on a tablet then apple tv app. Tearing obviously more visible on the tvGood enough though
-
@barbarian said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
This whole saga reinforces the lesson that 'you never win against a dickhead by being an equal or bigger dickhead'.
Which goes for pretty much everyone in this whole debacle.
@barbarian You are 100% right. People calling her a slut, these face masks etc is a fucking disgrace. Being married to an international cricketer in no way opens you up to this sort of ridicule.
-
If Warner has a problem with her having gone through the squads of every Australian football code, plus the odd tennis player and half of Little Britain then he shouldn't have married her.
IMHO she only became "tainted" when she got together with that deadshit bogan dwarf.
-
@rancid-schnitzel said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:
If Warner has a problem with her having gone through the squads of every Australian football code, plus the odd tennis player and half of Little Britain then he shouldn't have married her.
IMHO she only became "tainted" when she got together with that deadshit bogan dwarf.
If the reports are to be believed Davey made disparaging remarks about QDK's mum and sister. If so, he only has himself to blame for opening Pandora's box. Ask Glen McGrath, he knows all about that
The nastiest sledges in cricket
Michael Clarke's verbal barrage at England's last man standing James Anderson has well and truly brought to life this summer's Ashes series, as both sides prepare to dish it out during the next four Tests.
If you don't want to cop it, don't be the one to dish it out
-
Two separate issues for me.
- Does Warner deserve the de Kock comment based on his actions?
- Should family be off limits in so far as such insults go?
Most likely answer to both is yes IMO.
-
It's horrible that Candace's reputation gets kicked around like this. Fucking wrong.
These are the times we live in.
So why the hell, on the cusp of an emphatic victory does:
A) Warner succumb in purely idiotic lack of self control to a barb from a losing opponent which, as Sid Barret points out, in no way dishonours Candace
and
B ) the Aussie pr people drag Candace into this nonsense by offering her up as justification for a fucking millionaire acting like a dick.Overall a totally unnecessary drama punctuated with false bravado and an overeager Aussie media manager adopting modern deflection tecniques which results in an innocent woman's life being needlessly thrust into a poisonous spotlight.
Look in the mirror Davey, ask yourself, "could I have reacted differently?"
There's a lesson about self control and provocation here somewhere
