• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
183 Posts 43 Posters 22.4k Views
BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Megweya on last edited by
    #51

    @Megweya said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    Found the quote:

    Nigel Yalden
    RadioSportNZ / NewstalkZB Sports team.

    Picking Sean O'Brien is a no-brainer. Even if dead, I'd put him on bench just in case he came back to life

    I rate Yalden as analyst. So yeah

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to Megweya on last edited by booboo
    #52

    @Megweya said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @KiwiMurph Yalden said on this week's Out Of The Box rugby podcast that he puts O'Brien on the same level as McCaw

    I regard that as excess praise of Seanie.
    I hope by the end of the series he proves me wrong.

    Richie is an all-time great.
    I'm not sure that Sean is even the best-ever Irish 7.
    (My personal favourite is Fergus Slattery: "he's not flirting with offside, he's in love with it")

    I was lucky to get to see Richie live a few times.
    I went to 2014-Nov Eng v NZ with 4 friends (1 Kiwi).
    3 of us had T-shirts (to antagonise the Kiwi) that read:

    • (The Aussie classic)
      I'm not an alcoholic: I only drink when McCaw's offside

    • Only two things are infinite:
      . . 1: the universe and
      . . 2: the times when McCaw's offside
      (and I'm not sure about the first).

    • Offside is a rule that only applies to 29 other players. #mccawesome

    I'm glad that Richie played long enough for me to slowly learn that he knew the laws better than almost all players and better than many refs.
    He also knew better than all back-rows when contravening the laws would make a difference in a game-winning way.
    Like most greats, he also had amazing resilience of character to resist retaliating when he was targeted by the opposition.

    In my opinion (probably contentious on a Kiwi site), if I had to bracket two back-rows as operating at the same level, I'd say McCaw and Pocock.

    My criteria are: Who are the players from the opposition that you most want to be on your side or missing from theirs?
    But which, if they were missing when you had a ticket, you would be disappointed not to see a master of their craft.

    Back rows in that class for me would be:
    McCaw, Pocock, Dusatoir, Parisse, ...
    #set-the-bar-high

    As I said before, I hope to be proved wrong by the end of the third Test.
    But I fear that Warren may feel that Sam is worth including in at least one Test.


    Feel free to suggest one time in sport when a coach decided to give trusted players 1 more chance for glory.
    (Excluding most of the 2005 English Lions)

    McCaw v Pocock is a no contest. Seriously wishful thinking from the NZ/McCaw haters.

    McCaw v George Smith however... there was a year or two when Smith was actually better than McCaw. Didn't last. But it did happen.

    Pocock? Nup.

    And still not as good as the 3 best NZ 7s

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    Hansen was well informed:http://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/story/_/id/19650619/british-irish-lions-call-reinforcements-midweek-games Finn Russell, Scott Williams, Hamish Watson could be handy.

    Stockcar86S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #54

    @pakman said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    Hansen was well informed:http://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/story/_/id/19650619/british-irish-lions-call-reinforcements-midweek-games Finn Russell, Scott Williams, Hamish Watson could be handy.

    He must have picked up some useful hotel bugging tricks from somewhere

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #55

    Could also see W P Nel snared. Two squads my Rs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    From a mate

    Gatland's making it clear that any British person with a pulse or recently deceased in New Zealand will be a Lion before Mike Brown and Dylan Hartley. Magic.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #57

    @MiketheSnow said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    From a mate

    Gatland's making it clear that any British person with a pulse or recently deceased in New Zealand will be a Lion before Mike Brown and Dylan Hartley. Magic.

    Nel and either Gray brother should quite rightfully be spitting fucken tacks that there nobodies are in the squad before them.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #58

    @MN5 said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @MiketheSnow said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    From a mate

    Gatland's making it clear that any British person with a pulse or recently deceased in New Zealand will be a Lion before Mike Brown and Dylan Hartley. Magic.

    Nel and either Gray brother should quite rightfully be spitting fucken tacks that there nobodies are in the squad before them.

    Definitely on today's performance.

    NOT!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #59

    @MiketheSnow said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @MN5 said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @MiketheSnow said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    From a mate

    Gatland's making it clear that any British person with a pulse or recently deceased in New Zealand will be a Lion before Mike Brown and Dylan Hartley. Magic.

    Nel and either Gray brother should quite rightfully be spitting fucken tacks that there nobodies are in the squad before them.

    Definitely on today's performance.

    NOT!

    You're assuming MN5 actually watches rugby?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #60

    @Bones said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @MiketheSnow said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @MN5 said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @MiketheSnow said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    From a mate

    Gatland's making it clear that any British person with a pulse or recently deceased in New Zealand will be a Lion before Mike Brown and Dylan Hartley. Magic.

    Nel and either Gray brother should quite rightfully be spitting fucken tacks that there nobodies are in the squad before them.

    Definitely on today's performance.

    NOT!

    You're assuming MN5 actually watches rugby?

    Fuck off raghead. Don't ruin my buzz

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    Russell/Dell tipped by Sky UK. Love to see Watson.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    Here we go again 🙂

    If Farrell is fit

    1 - Vunipola
    2 - Owens / George - can see either of these starting. I think George is better off the bench
    3 - Furlong
    4 - Kruis
    5 - AWJ / Itoje - can see either of these starting. I think Itoje is better off the bench
    6 - O'Mahoney - Captain if Warburton is on the bench
    7 - Warburton / O'Brien - can see either of these starting. I think O'Brien is better off the bench
    8 - Faletau
    9 - Murray
    10 - Farrell
    11 - Daly - Won't happen, but North should be nowehere near the Test 23
    12 - Te'o
    13 - Davies
    14 - Watson
    15 - Halfpenny

    16 - George / Owens
    17 - McGrath
    18 - Sinckler
    19 - Itoje /AWJ
    20 - O'Brien / Warburton
    21 - Webb
    22 - Sexton
    23 - Williams - not been great but covers wing and fullback

    If Farrell isn't fit, then Sexton to 10 and Biggar to bench instead of Williams

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Margin_Walker
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    Not going to be far off with that. For me you start the best players as you want them playing more of the game. No point being good off the bench if you are 20-30 points down when they come on. Know Eddie has had success with it with England but he starts Itoje and George only benches as Hartley is captain. The other 'finishers' for England are Sinckler and Te'o who are probably struggling for a start in front of Cole and Farrell.

    George and Owens is actually pretty even for me saying that. You'd perhaps go George to keep the 2, 4, 5 club unit together at lineout time. Itoje is a better player than AWJ for me, so starts. Henderson was very good off the bench today, so will be interesting to see what Gatland does with the locks.

    Agree re North, not the game he needed to cement his place and I would go Daly. Watson also quiet today, but he had little space to work with. Wouldn't be entirely surprised to see him spring a SOB, Warburton, Faletau back row, but we'll see.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    Wreck Diver
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    From this weekends game I would hope that we don't fan out to quickly after a ruck is formed. We can at times get caught with only A Smith defending behind the ruck and a couple of big boys powering through to get in behind us. I hope we take the Lions on up front the way we do when the Bok's and the English say they are going to smash us up front and starve us of the ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #65

    @No-Quarter said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    This is what I think they'll go with for test one:

    1 Moody
    2 Taylor
    3 Franks
    4 Retallick
    5 Whitelock
    6 Kaino
    7 Cane
    8 Read
    9 A Smith
    10 B Barrett
    11 J Savea
    12 Crotty
    13 ALB
    14 Dagg
    15 B Smith
    16 Harris
    17 Crockett
    18 Faumuina
    19 Romano
    20 A Savea
    21 TJP
    22 Cruden
    23 SBW

    It's pretty easy to pick an AB team, and I think what I chose above has just solidified following recent results.

    Only change I'd make is SBW to start with Crotty on the bench due to Crotty's lack of game-time.

    A Smith has done enough to warrant a start. As has J Savea.

    Romano or Scott Barrett is the only other point of contention, but I think they've been keeping Romano on ice and will use him in test one due to his experience.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    I also prefer SBW to start. Problem with that is Crotty doesn't appear to offer much impact as a sub. Added to Cruden being unlikely to be used as tactical sub and that means bench becomes very injury focussed. Crotty/ALB suffers from lack of grunt, albeit wouldn't be such an issue if Farrell at 12.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #67

    @No-Quarter said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @No-Quarter said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    This is what I think they'll go with for test one:

    1 Moody
    2 Taylor
    3 Franks
    4 Retallick
    5 Whitelock
    6 Kaino
    7 Cane
    8 Read
    9 A Smith
    10 B Barrett
    11 J Savea
    12 Crotty
    13 ALB
    14 Dagg
    15 B Smith
    16 Harris
    17 Crockett
    18 Faumuina
    19 Romano
    20 A Savea
    21 TJP
    22 Cruden
    23 SBW

    It's pretty easy to pick an AB team, and I think what I chose above has just solidified following recent results.

    Only change I'd make is SBW to start with Crotty on the bench due to Crotty's lack of game-time.

    A Smith has done enough to warrant a start. As has J Savea.

    Romano or Scott Barrett is the only other point of contention, but I think they've been keeping Romano on ice and will use him in test one due to his experience.

    What are the strengths/weaknesses of Barrett vs Romano?

    I'm asking for a friend who doesnt know rugby that well.

    taniwharugbyT No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #68

    @MN5 one of Scotts weaknesses is that he isn't as fast as Beaudie or Jordie

    MN5M ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #69

    @taniwharugby said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @MN5 one of Scotts weaknesses is that he isn't as fast as Beaudie or Jordie

    Unless it's a race to the dinner table

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #70

    @MN5 said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @No-Quarter said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    @No-Quarter said in BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?):

    This is what I think they'll go with for test one:

    1 Moody
    2 Taylor
    3 Franks
    4 Retallick
    5 Whitelock
    6 Kaino
    7 Cane
    8 Read
    9 A Smith
    10 B Barrett
    11 J Savea
    12 Crotty
    13 ALB
    14 Dagg
    15 B Smith
    16 Harris
    17 Crockett
    18 Faumuina
    19 Romano
    20 A Savea
    21 TJP
    22 Cruden
    23 SBW

    It's pretty easy to pick an AB team, and I think what I chose above has just solidified following recent results.

    Only change I'd make is SBW to start with Crotty on the bench due to Crotty's lack of game-time.

    A Smith has done enough to warrant a start. As has J Savea.

    Romano or Scott Barrett is the only other point of contention, but I think they've been keeping Romano on ice and will use him in test one due to his experience.

    What are the strengths/weaknesses of Barrett vs Romano?

    I'm asking for a friend who doesnt know rugby that well.

    Hah, Barrett has a better all-round game but doesn't bring quite the same physicality as Romano, which is why I'd go Romano as a bench option for impact, as well as experience.

    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

BIL & AB teams for Test #1 (AKA - who's impressing you at the moment?)
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.