Wallaby EOYT 2016
-
@kiwiinmelb said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.
It really doesn't matter if they do get more than 18 wins it doesn't prove anything as it doesn't prove a lot with us. If they do well done to them. But I couldn't give a Fcuk but the media will think its like Zeus has returned and is playing for England.
-
@Wreck-Diver said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
@kiwiinmelb said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.
It really doesn't matter if they do get more than 18 wins it doesn't prove anything as it doesn't prove a lot with us. If they do well done to them. But I couldn't give a Fcuk but the media will think its like Zeus has returned and is playing for England.
How does it not prove a lot with us?
-
@jegga said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
Krusty has coached his team to 6 wins from 15 games this year, there must be rumours in aussie about him getting the axe soon?
Who else is there?
Anyway, i hope nobody in the Wallabies camp blames the ref. I'm going back to sleep. Cricket season!
-
@jegga And SA had 8 loses - a poor year for both teams.
I haven't seen the game yet but have recorded it. This Grand Slam tour was always going to be demanding, and in hindsight Aust would have been wiser to play Ireland and England at the start. They probably had little choice though.
-
Reading commentary: execution killed us. Held up twice over the line. A little knock on from Pocock prevented another try. Another pass created an intercept. Some shit work from Phipps and others trying to inject some pace.
The coach has to wear some of that, and also the fact that the bench didn't see a lot of time this tour.
But the players simply have to do better. The effect of Byrnes has not quite filtered through, clearly.
The depth is probably better right now, but not across all positions.
Really need 2017 to be that turning point to build a couple of good years. Right now, I could give less fucks about rugby.
-
Bit of a misread on the events there Nick. The tries held up were more to do with good defence than poor execution. Pococks knock on created an opportunity rather than lose one.
The real killer for you guys was Phipps having a complete brain fart waiting for a call from Peyper that never came. At that point in the game your lot were playing better and England were starting to look like they might get frustrated and crumble. It let them back in, they gathered their heads and built from there.
However you were hard done by with Yardes try. The TMO telling Peyper he never lost contact with the ball while the evidence was the opposite. -
@Crucial said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
Bit of a misread on the events there Nick. The tries held up were more to do with good defence than poor execution. Pococks knock on created an opportunity rather than lose one.
Getting held up is good defensive execution, but getting close enough to be over the line and not being able to score indicates another option was available, or that the subsequent scrum play wasn't good enough.
The point I guess I was trying to make is we got close, but couldn't finish.
Its another game I won't see due to the shitty timeslot
-
Good match. Australia came out like a house on fire, similar to the first Test in June, and England looked to be hanging on by their fingernails. Australia couldn't keep up the intensity though, and also like in that first Test England's forwards managed to get on top and built the pressure.
Some very strange refereeing calls both ways - I thought Yarde's try was a knock-on and DHP should never have been sin-binned, but also Pocock clearly dived on Farrell when he had dropped to collect a loose ball in the lead-up to the first Australian try.
I thought Nathan Hughes was excellent for England - he had big shoes to fill and while he doesn't have quite Billy V's relentless go forward, he kept carrying well after Timani had vanished from sight, and his extra acceleration and threat of the offload adds a different dimension.
-
Pretty disappointing way to end the season.
We started strongly, but needed to make it count more than we did. Should have been 20-blot, but we couldn't convert our chances and let England back in.
In the end, England were just too good. Hung tough in the first stanza, then kicked away. Their forwards were too physical, their backs too composed. They waited for our errors and then feasted on them.
Peyper was poor, but it didn't effect the end result. I thought he was only watching one team at the breakdown, and the Poms got all the 50/50s - the call before Youngs try was a case in point. But that's rugby, and we had plenty of chances to take him out of the game but didn't take them.
What to make of that season? Fuck I don't know. We played 7 games against the best two sides in the World, and were well dusted in all fucking 7. Still can't quite believe that, after the form we showed at the RWC.
Rugby's a funny game sometimes, hey.
-
@NTA Timani was huge in the first half, NTA. Quieter in the second as England had all the ball. But it makes you wonder how Cheika selected Mumm last week when you have this great ball runner to pick from. The lineout appeared to be fine as well with him there. He should at the very least be selected on the bench to bring on some impact later in the game. Cheika's selections at times this year have been questionable.
-
@kiwiinmelb records are made to be broken.
-
@akan004 said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
@NTA Timani was huge in the first half, NTA. Quieter in the second as England had all the ball. But it makes you wonder how Cheika selected Mumm last week when you have this great ball runner to pick from. The lineout appeared to be fine as well with him there. He should at the very least be selected on the bench to bring on some impact later in the game. Cheika's selection at times this year have been questionable.
Yeah I think we need to see a proper #8, even if you're going to have the Pooper on the flanks. That won't be a concern next year with Pocock on sabbatical. Hopefully Timani continues at 8, and guys like Holloway and McCalman get a good season in.
Most of the games I watched, we needed to get more out of the tight five. Wales was an exception, but then Wales were shit and we cantered that one home.
Some of the selections have looked like horses for courses, and then shit in hindsight. We lost to Ireland by 3, despite the lopsided penalty count and Mumm's brainfart. But if we'd won, does Mumm's good work to make up for that error get tossed away?
The real question you have to ask: in two games against the ABs, the Irish gave away 8 penalties. So why pick a Wallaby lineup with two opensides, that is likely to get penalised at the breakdown? Didn't help that Ireland had stacks of possession, which was a factor in how many you give away.
Dunno. People have perception of players and tend to stick with them. Some people look at Genia's work this year in contrast to Phipps, and forget every fucking awful box kick he put up. Swings and roundabouts.
The thing is, we need to stop losing on the swings. If that makes any sense.
Ultimately, losses like Ireland, and this one, are better for the team over the longer term. The cracks can't be papered over - our discipline and execution just aren't good enough.
And that needs to change at the provincial level and schools level. Skills just aren't valued when incumbency is pretty much assured. The kids who are in the school first XV have few rivals to put pressure on them. The base isn't broad enough.
-
@Crucial said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
However you were hard done by with Yardes try. The TMO telling Peyper he never lost contact with the ball while the evidence was the opposite.
I thought so too at first until the slowmo showed no separation between his left hand and the ball when it was grounded. The problem was that came off the blatant forward pass.
The run away try came from a non-call at the ruck with Vunipola in the way of Phipps who didn't milk it enough for Peyper to award an advantage and then Phipps threw it to an unsuspecting and stationary Kepu.
So that's 14 points.
Then Pocock threw a loopy gift of an intercept and that was the game.
England took their chances and started to impose themselves on defence as the game wore on. A more accurate Wallabies outfit would have had the game sewn up by half-time.
-
said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
Sefanaia Naivalu,
My hoped for draw didn't eventuate ... but the important question is, just how many Fijian wingers is Cheika going to try before he settles on a combo?
-
@antipodean said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
I thought so too at first until the slowmo showed no separation between his left hand and the ball when it was grounded. The problem was that came off the blatant forward pass.
Was hard to tell with the bright advertising in the background - I thought his left hand came off it a little.
It didn't matter though - WR issued clarifications around possession, making juggled possession still equivalent to possession.
Yarde's right hand hit the ball a frame or two before he grounded it. Therefore he's in possession. Therefore fair try.
If Folau had gotten a finger on it anywhere in that sequence, knock-on by Yarde.
-
England's second half was excellent. Powerful, moved the ball constantly, and looked really threatening. Their defense was really strong as well.
That said, Kepu's try was a brilliant 90m piece of multi-phase rugby and Aus should have been right in it. But a shit goal kick, and then England just crushed them to win comfortably. WTF was pocock thinking with that pass?
Well done England, an unbeaten year is huge
-
@mariner4life said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:
WTF was pocock thinking with that pass?
About the limit of his skill in that regard.
-
that game was interesting for seeing many liabilities and limitations by both sides.
Australia's midfield I thought was poor, their locks v quiet and so too became TImani (so much so, perhaps he went off early?) But the player I really liked seeing around the park was Dan Cole, he was a giant aggro rock in defence. Gee Folau had a mostly down and slightly up game, is he that bad or are the Wallabies all just badly coached with eggshell depth? Maybe, yes and yes. Edit: oh and I thought Pocock at 6 Hooper at 7 and Timani at 8 looks a much better balanced combo. But were they shaded in the turnovers by England?
And how often do we see the Englisg backline look faster and more decisive than their Wallabies equivalants? Or is Foley not fast and strategic enough to get backs hitting the ball at pace? -
@nostrildamus For me, it starts with Phipps; laboured service prevents Foley using his speed, so he ends up pressured and making poor decisions to a stationary backline. Or immensely telegraphed inside ball.
