Car Advice - Mummy Cars!
-
Thoughts on buying a European model in NZ? higher costs for parts or servicing??
-
@Paekakboyz Yes
-
@Paekakboyz Absolutely. The dealership service departments will gouge you big time, but you can save by using an independent workshop. We have some up here owned by guys who broke away from the dealerships. Still more expensive than your average Japanese car I'd say
-
servicing most vehicles through their 'dealerships' is always pricey and they will always try to tell you they are the only ones that can do it...
I had my vehicle serviced a month back for it's 15k service, $170 vs $500 at Dealer...and mine is a NZ new Jap car.
I had a Hyundai (our own one) and it was about $400-$600 for the dealer services, my old work Hyundai was more, but I didn't care cos I wasn't paying.
-
I go to an Audi approved independent and can get a full service for around $400.
Don't mention tyres though
Still rather have a nice European motor any day.
It's not losing your license that's the challenge - all them horsies under the bonnet wanting to go for a gallop
-
@MajorRage Ha! I wasn't really suggesting an S3 as a mummy car, but any model A3 is pretty good. 2.0TDI might be the trick, good economy and still has a fair bit of poke. As for the insurance does Mrs MR not have any no claims due to accidents or just because she's not the named driver? If the latter you ,might want to consider multi-car insurance which allows you to be named driver (and therefore get the NCD) on one car and Mrs MR on the other. I'm doing this for all my lot and get a pretty good deal, plus Mrs Cato now has 5 years NCD and one of the smaller Cats has three years NCD.
-
@dogmeat Using the dealer for the service is helpful if you buy new as they're pretty hot on warranties and will use any excuse to invalidate them. I pay about £250 for my Audi and about £450 for MY car (911) but that's only every two years so pretty reasonable really. Mind you if you add on a full brake fluid change it ups it a bit.
-
@Catogrande She's down as a named driver, but I've only recently learned that she doesn't accrue NCD as only one driver can accrue that. Wish I'd known that as would have changed her to the named driver after 5 years, in which case she'd now have 3 years.
S3 and 911 as your two cars. Very good. Very very good.
-
@MajorRage said in Car Advice - Mummy Cars!:
@Catogrande She's down as a named driver, but I've only recently learned that she doesn't accrue NCD as only one driver can accrue that. Wish I'd known that as would have changed her to the named driver after 5 years, in which case she'd now have 3 years.
S3 and 911 as your two cars. Very good. Very very good.
MR, don't you have an insurance history from outside the UK that you can transfer over for her? I managed to get the NZ AA* to send an email confirming lifetime NCB for all named drivers on our cars. Reduced our UK insurance from "completely fucken stupid rip-off" to "I guess if that's what I have to pay then I will"
- this is despite NZ not really having NCBs any more. They surprising still keep note for the purposes of insurance history overseas
-
@MajorRage Worthwhile getting a quote from Admiral or Aviva for muti-car insurance. I've even known Admiral to sharpen their pencil a bit if their quote is higher than elsewhere.
Yes, I'd be a rich man if it wasn't for my degree of petrol-headedness.
-
@MajorRage said in Car Advice - Mummy Cars!:
@Crucial No, we've only had one car the entire time we've been in HK, and as you can only accrue for one, then it is what it is. I will try all the tricks in the book though!
Yeah the system over here beggars belief at times. It has less to do with risk assessment/management of the customer and more to do with ticking boxes and risk management of the flunkies employed to take orders. I assume you are using a broker to work around some of the crap?
My son is about to go through the insurance nightmare over here and one thing we discovered is that they won't even acknowledge the fact that he has been driving since the age of 15 with a clean record because their systems throw a wobbly when confronted with a number that doesn't fit with the UK driving age. So basically he loses 2 yrs of clean experience which is worth a lot of £ per annum.The insurance market over here (and in Oz) only confirms my argument against compulsory insurance in NZ. As a consumer you are far better off over all if you remove the type of driver that won't pay for insurance from the claims pool.
-
Hmmm, I'm not sure I agree with all of that Crucial.
I take your point of about not being able to fit in people of outside age etc, but I can see why they would be unwilling to bend outside the laws that govern your country.
I like the way that it's basically impossible for younger drivers to get higher powered cars. Despite being a bit of a petrol head myself, I was also a teenage driver, and in my view, there is simply no justification for younger drivers to be able to have access to sports / higher powered cars. When you are a new driver in the UK, you can basically only get insurance for 1-1.2 litre cars. It's impossible for a 17 year old to be behind the wheel of a sports car. Which is the way it should be.
-
@Catogrande said in Car Advice - Mummy Cars!:
@MajorRage Worthwhile getting a quote from Admiral or Aviva for muti-car insurance. I've even known Admiral to sharpen their pencil a bit if their quote is higher than elsewhere.
Yes, I'd be a rich man if it wasn't for my degree of petrol-headedness.
What else have you owned apart from the 911?
-
@MajorRage said in Car Advice - Mummy Cars!:
Hmmm, I'm not sure I agree with all of that Crucial.
I take your point of about not being able to fit in people of outside age etc, but I can see why they would be unwilling to bend outside the laws that govern your country.
It's nothing to do with bending laws. Retail insurance is all about grouping together a set of customers then on-selling that risk to another insurer as a group. If, for example, their re-insurance is geared around clean, older drivers with garaged cars then obviously they will set obstructive premiums (or refuse outright) someone that doesn't fit that bill.
If you have calculated your risk level at drivers with, say, over 7 years clean experience and are offered a customer that fits that profile it is counter to your model to then refuse to acknowledge 2 years and turn them away.
Basically they have decided that it isn't worth the bother to have exceptions that their call centre staff can't deal with and are willing to turn those customers away. It probably does make sense profit wise given the %s, but nothing to do going outside of laws.
As an example, we have 'special' plates on our car and although this has no bearing whatsoever on our risk profile (are we more likely to have an accident or not lock our vehicle because it has non standard plates?) we had to go to a special broker who had arranged a special policy with an insurer to cover this.
The only thing stopping other companies from providing the insurance was that the non standard plate couldn't be entered into their system. -
@jegga It's my second 911. It's a 991 variant Cabriolet S. I had a straightforward 997 variant Cabriolet before that. Previously I had a Merc 350SLK which was good but not as raw as the Porsches and my first out and out sports car was a Boxster which was great fun if a little under-powered.
The latest one is my favourite, partly because of the way I bought it. Mrs Cato was away for a week in the Med with her family and when she got back there was the new car on the driveway. She was not best pleased but couldn't say Jack because she'd just had a holiday with the out-laws.