• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Ireland II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
1.1k Posts 87 Posters 322.4k Views
All Blacks v Ireland II
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #977

    @MajorRage said in Ireland II:

    @mariner4life He is Irish and did play for Ireland, so looking at it from his point of view, I think it's fine.

    The point you make about the red card is a fair one, although it's one I think that could be entirely possible.

    What he writes about Cane is spot on.

    I'm happy with them looking at it as well. I'm not overly happy about it being fairly widely accepted that the refs should have carded him, and that was a game changer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #978

    @taniwharugby Exactly. A bloke gets taken out due to a hit to the head. Thats not good. So the process that follows was fair.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by Siam
    #979

    The Darcy article is in places insightful and god knows he knows more about international rugby than anyone here.

    However as a writer trying to get a "tackler's responsibility for duty of care" point across (which dominates his Cane/Henshaw situation) he lost me when failing to reciprocate on the 2nd worst breach in the entire game of World Rugby's November 11 head high directive:

    "The New Zealand post-match defence, led by Hansen - and their media after both players were cited - quickly changed the point of attack: Well, Johnny Sexton should have been cited for the high tackle on Barrett as he crossed for his try. That doesn’t wash. Barrett was moving downwards to ground the ball. Henshaw and Zebo were both upright, moving forward. The Sexton tackle wasn’t even referred to the citing commissioner."

    No duty of care when someone is scoring or Barrett ducked so low that Sexton was unable not to hit his face and neck?

    The inference that all is ok if (notoriously inconsistent) citing commissioners make no submissions further devalues his objectivity in this instance I reckons

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Siam on last edited by taniwharugby
    #980

    @Siam seems he has 2 measuring sticks, one for Ireland and one for NZ.

    The one Fekitoa got done for, the guy was falling, and Fekitoa's first impact was on the shoulder.

    I thought when Sexton hit BB he was upright and Sexton definitely was aiming high in an effort to wrap up the ball, and think his hand even hit BBs face, and then was odd that when the try had been scored Sexton looked to release and then grabbed again at BBs head while both were on the deck.

    Pretty sure BB didn't care either though, it's just the green/black tinted glasses when looking at these things

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #981

    @ACT-Crusader said in Ireland II:

    @akan004 said in Ireland II:

    @Virgil Unfortunately all this whinging from the opposition is having an impact on how the refs are perceiving the ABs. The fact that they are the most penalised team in world rugby is largely due to this.

    Mind reader in your time off are you?

    I don't think what fans or media say has any major influence on what a ref does in the heat of the moment during a test match.

    This is a direct quote from Shag.

    "I think we get our share if not more and I think there is a perception that says look at the All Blacks and not the other team. Sub consciously I'm saying I don't think that is consciously. Look at the last game 14: 4 is not a balanced game is it, it's not reality."

    mariner4lifeM ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #982

    @akan004 said in Ireland II:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Ireland II:

    @akan004 said in Ireland II:

    @Virgil Unfortunately all this whinging from the opposition is having an impact on how the refs are perceiving the ABs. The fact that they are the most penalised team in world rugby is largely due to this.

    Mind reader in your time off are you?

    I don't think what fans or media say has any major influence on what a ref does in the heat of the moment during a test match.

    This is a direct quote from Shag.

    "I think we get our share if not more and I think there is a perception that says look at the All Blacks and not the other team. Sub consciously I'm saying I don't think that is consciously. Look at the last game 14: 4 is not a balanced game is it, it's not reality."

    Careful Shag, that's sounding dangerously Cheika-istic.

    I would prefer if anonymous internet idiots like ourselves said such things, not the AB coach.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #983

    It wouldnt surprise me if we end up in a similar situation as AFL,

    Where if a player gets hurt from contact to the head , the tackler is responsible even in a accident , because it his duty of care to make sure the head does not come into contact ,

    I hope not,

    but there almost seems to be a push to go in that direction in the NH , judging by the last week

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #984

    @akan004 said in Ireland II:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Ireland II:

    @akan004 said in Ireland II:

    @Virgil Unfortunately all this whinging from the opposition is having an impact on how the refs are perceiving the ABs. The fact that they are the most penalised team in world rugby is largely due to this.

    Mind reader in your time off are you?

    I don't think what fans or media say has any major influence on what a ref does in the heat of the moment during a test match.

    This is a direct quote from Shag.

    "I think we get our share if not more and I think there is a perception that says look at the All Blacks and not the other team. Sub consciously I'm saying I don't think that is consciously. Look at the last game 14: 4 is not a balanced game is it, it's not reality."

    Yeah I saw that and if Shag really believes that then I still reckon it's rubbish.

    Alternatively we have seen coaches that like to throw a couple of hand grenades out there hoping one will explode and have the journos picking up the debris to keep pushing what the coach thinks.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #985

    @ACT-Crusader I posted the interview in the FRance thread, when in the context of what he is talking about it makes sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    beardie
    wrote on last edited by beardie
    #986

    So "World Rugby boss Alain Rolland admits to All Blacks that Aaron Smith yellow card was wrong" .

    link text

    That adds some more spice, doesn't it?

    That

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to beardie on last edited by
    #987

    @beardie said in Ireland II:

    So "World Rugby boss Alain Rolland admits to All Blacks that Aaron Smith yellow card was wrong" .

    link text

    That adds some more spice, doesn't it?

    That

    That article really is a pile of tripe. assuming Rolland did call Hansen and say the Smith YC was wrong, how come Stuff knew about it. Did someone in the NZ camp reveal this to the press? If so is that any better than Kearney bleating about things after the match? Stuff then goes on to selectively quote Jerry Guscott about "whispering" the refs need to look closer at the All Blacks.He didn't whisper it, it was part of a full article on the BBC and it was mainly very complimentary about the All Blacks - I posted it earlier n this thread.

    Honestly it is shit like this that fuels the paranoia about woe is us, they're all out to get us 'cos we keep winning. It's just complete shit.

    SiamS jeggaJ antipodeanA 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by Siam
    #988

    @Catogrande agree totally about the Guscott smear. Cheap and nasty. Guscotts comments in original context related to the speed they play, a good and fair comment.

    Hansen today mentioned Rolland told him on monday. It's on that radio link someone posted (two links, last third on the first and a couple of minutes of the 2nd).

    Hansens parts are worth a listen. Honest and based on realty I reckon. That hansen waits till thursday to mention it reflects well on him

    These links. 10 mins into this one http://120.138.20.16/WeekOnDemand/radiosport/2016.11.24-17.00.00-D.mp3

    Start of this one http://120.138.20.16/WeekOnDemand/radiosport/2016.11.17-17.15.00-D.mp3

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #989

    @Catogrande stuff had a bullshit headline about Guscott and when you read the story it bore no resemblance what the headline inferred and was actually quite interesting.

    Have you noticed theres a whole thread about how shit Stuff is? They tried to merge with ME this year and when the commerce commission turned them down they used the hashtag #stuffme on twitter.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #990

    @jegga said in Ireland II:

    @Catogrande stuff had a bullshit headline about Guscott and when you read the story it bore no resemblance what the headline inferred and was actually quite interesting.

    Have you noticed theres a whole thread about how shit Stuff is? They tried to merge with ME this year and when the commerce commission turned them down they used the hashtag #stuffme on twitter.

    Another reminder to resist judging a group of people by the slop their media dishes up

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by antipodean
    #991
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bluedex
    wrote on last edited by
    #992

    Love this thread, absolutely hilarious, only ruined by the minority of sensible posters contributing balanced and fair comments. Particularly love the whingeing about whingeing, classic!

    taniwharugbyT nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to bluedex on last edited by
    #993

    @bluedex it is ok to whinge about whinging as long as someone else started the whinging

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #994

    Where do you draw the line?

    Is it acceptable to whinge about the whinging about the whinging?

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #995

    This wouldn't make me whinge but it made me so uncontrollably horny I fapped while reading it.
    The owner of the cafe where I was reading it on my phone says she will call the cops if I come back but her coffee was average anyway

    Stuff
    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #996

    haha gold....

    Francis also pointed the finger at Read for detaching from a scrum and attacking a ball under the feet of Irish No 8 Jamie Heaslip with the tryline beckoning.

    "In most referees' books that was a penalty try and a yellow card. Read looked at Peyper and Peyper looked at Read as if to say 'sorry old bean, diplomatic immunity'. What did it for me was the lack of embarrassment from both men.

    Peyper's Dublin effort, where the All Blacks gained revenge for their historic loss to Ireland in Chicago, continues to leave Francis shaking his head.

    "If there had been a strong referee in charge this would have been a completely different game. I'm not saying Ireland could or would have won it but the Lord of the Flies element would have been taken out of the game," Francis wrote for the Irish Independent.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks v Ireland II
Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.