• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs Pumas I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
394 Posts 77 Posters 68.8k Views
All Blacks vs Pumas I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    We could all notice that Romano seems to have become a lot bigger the last few months. That's probably what the coaches expected of him, to increase his physicality against teams such as the Pumas and the Boks?

    Anyway, I'd replace both Romano and Tuipulotu by Bird, if I could. He should be picked for the EOYT the way he's been playing for the Chiefs & now Canterbury, but I'm not sure how many players will be selected that are not already in the squad now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to reprobate on last edited by Frye
    #130

    @reprobate said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    something must be up with tuipolotou, he didn't get a run against the aussies which makes the 'argies scrum strongly' argument moot. romano has been a bit underwhelming, so i'm glad they're giving this new romero guy a crack - he'll probably be able to translate their lineout calls too.

    Hopefully this Romero lad doesn't immediately fall over after contact like the other Luke.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #131

    @dogmeat said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    Any suggestions on where to watch it in Ho Chi Minh City guys?

    Phattys off Pasteur st. Good pb for sports DM

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #132

    Fuck that's a boring team. We're really scraping the barrell trying to have a discussion about Pat T v Romano v Romero.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #133

    2004 was the last divisive team selection...

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SmudgeS Offline
    SmudgeS Offline
    Smudge
    replied to infidel on last edited by
    #134

    @infidel said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    Why/how do they name the team at 5am NZT for a home test?

    Media release embargoed until 5am?

    For the newspapers. Which is quaint, but appreciated.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Frye on last edited by
    #135

    @Frye said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    Hopefully this Romero lad doesn't immediately fall over after contact like the other Luke.

    I hear he's fairly handy in the Argentinean goal.

    Ofa T, Pat T, DMac and TKB have been released to play in the Auckland-Waikato game on Sunday.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #136

    @Stargazer yep he sure looks bigger but by the looks a lot of that is down to pies at the old servo. Perhaps he's using Hansen as a role model ?

    So him and Savea don't get a start despite images saying that they were in with a shot.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLout
    wrote on last edited by
    #137

    Firstly, sorry mods, but this new board sucks ass. Scroll city and too much white space. Anyway, I must be getting old.. opps, yes I am. lol

    As for the team, why the fuck are they picking Izzy on the wing, that's ridiculous, he's not a bloody winger. You can't tell me we can't pick a specialist winger in the side. Surely Ben to wing and Izzy to fullback. I mean he won't embarass us but I like Izzy's kicking at the back, and Ben is a great winger. Don't know why Hansen continually pisses about with the back three. Don't need another '99 thanks.

    ACT CrusaderA KirwanK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #138

    @LagerLout this new board is head and shoulders better than the old version. You just need to learn.

    Hansen is running with 2 15's rather than two wingers. Watch them interchange

    LagerLoutL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #139

    @LagerLout does a winger need to get a hat trick every game to get a pass mark from you ? if that's the case Dagg did come up short, he'll be desperate to redeem himself this weekend against the Argies.

    LagerLoutL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLout
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #140

    @MN5 I don't know actually, you must be watching everything I post if that's the case. Since when was Israel a winger please, or am I missing something?

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #141

    Well he got two tries and played extremely well, that's a winger in my book

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLout
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #142

    @Hooroo said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    @LagerLout this new board is head and shoulders better than the old version. You just need to learn.

    Hansen is running with 2 15's rather than two wingers. Watch them interchange

    Exactly my reference to 99. Is Israel our best alternative Winger in the country? They may interchange but he has to play this position for the proportion of the game. Before you have a pop, I'm a massive fan of Israel, go back and look at my posts if you care too. I just don't think he should be on the wing when Ben is a better winger and Israel IMO is a better fullback. The starting positions seem odd to me.

    Anyway, I'm pleased both are in the team, and I'm sure they'll be fine, I personally prefer specialists in most positions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to LagerLout on last edited by
    #143

    @LagerLout Did you miss him on the wing in the last game? He went alright and they switched it up a bit.

    I think this is related to BFA being the best in the world, and Dagg being the next best option for the wing/FB position. He's basically taken over from Jane while NMS is out.

    LagerLoutL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLoutL Offline
    LagerLout
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #144

    @gt12 lol, no mate. I've not missed an AB game since, um, I can't recall. Yes, he played well, it's not black and white, I'm simply making the point that I'm surprised that a) Ben is not on the wing when b) Izzy is the better fullback. Hansen obviously doesn't think the same! Izzy has been very good on the wing and I'm over the moon he's back to form.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #145

    @LagerLout for me it is the best for the team than the position and this works really well currently

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #146

    @Kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    2004 was the last divisive team selection...

    How Rush was selected to start over Tuiali'i for those Pom tests still baffles me..... 🙂

    KirwanK mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #147

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    @Kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    2004 was the last divisive team selection...

    How Rush was selected to start over Tuiali'i for those Pom tests still baffles me..... 🙂

    He was a better player, simple 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #148

    @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    @Kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas I:

    2004 was the last divisive team selection...

    How Rush was selected to start over Tuiali'i for those Pom tests still baffles me..... 🙂

    Mose had all the talent in the world, was big enough, just never cracked on did he? what a waste.

    Rush was perfect for 2004. He had a 1 year job and he did it.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0

All Blacks vs Pumas I
Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.